This was never about religious beliefs.
Never.
Its about control and forcing others to your wacko religious beliefs.
Hmmm part two, Luddly!
All this time I defended fellow prochoice activists,
based on equal freedom under the Constitution,
my Prolife friends argued with me that the prochoice agenda was
NOT about "freedom of choice" (secular equivalent of "religious liberties")
but "about control" and "forcing others" to accept their political agenda.
I didn't believe them, until I saw it with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears!
Pushing the ACA that RESTRICTS choices and PENALIZES options for health care that "don't meet government regulations"
seems to PROVE this isn't about "prochoice"
but about political "control" and "forcing agenda on others."
I hope you see why ACA supporters
are coming across the same way as you criticize:
not about CHOICE, but all about forcing controls onto others.
Can you at least see it is two-sided? That
BOTH sides feel and fear the other side is "abusing govt" to push political agenda?
If one side is wrong to use govt this way, the other side is equally wrong.
If one side is justified in using govt to defend their beliefs, the other side is justified also.
How are the two sides and beliefs not equal to each other?