What do we now know about a virus?

[Thoth001]

When a body has a high degree of toxicity, bacteria feeding upon that toxic dead matter and tissue will be poisoned to death.

When the body is at such a point of systemic toxicity, where bacterial levels and all living microbes in the body have been diminished or killed due to the above reasons, the body will call upon the help of viruses to help cleanse itself.

When the body cannot utilize milder methods, such as a cold (usually bacterial), it will utilize the help of non-living protein solvents which are known as viruses. I will show why this is the only logical answer.

Viruses help consume and eliminate substances into small particles that can then be expelled via mucous membranes, out through the skin, or through the intestinal tract.

Cells produce viruses when their tissues are so toxic that phagocytes, parasites, bacteria, and fungi cannot help cleanse, repair and regenerate their tissues and fluids.

Science states, incorrectly without proof, that viruses originate outside the body, then ‘hijack’ the RNA or DNA of the cell, and then replicate whilst attacking cells indiscriminately.

If this were true, viruses would replicate endlessly, eventually attacking all healthy cells, but they do not.

We know that antibodies, a type of white blood cell, regulates the virus.

There exists no video evidence of viruses hijacking cells, except for 3D renders, and animations based on theory.

The True Creation of Viruses (simplistic view)

Science falsely claims that viruses replicate themselves. In reality, it is the cell itself that is producing the virus.

Notice how viruses are manufactured by a healthy cell but do not destroy it.

RNA and/or DNA is given by the host cell to dissolve specific substances within the body. If this were not the case, the virus would destroy the cell which created it, but it does not.

The virus is ejected, damaging part of the cell, but not destroying it completely. The cell is then able to repair itself in time.

Cells conspire as one unit to cleanse themselves and their surroundings so that new cellular activity can thrive.

Large amounts of viral activity are present when the body is unable to use milder living microbial detoxification methods to cleanse itself due to systemic toxicity of tissues that poison living microbes.

Steps for Creation of a Virus

Viral proteins part of the genome of the living body existing in every cell which determines what type of proteins will be created by a cell is called into action.

Viral proteins existing in the cell enter the nucleus of the cell. Viruses are manufactured in their whole form within the cell, and sequenced/encoded via RNA/DNA host directives.

The virus leaves the nucleus and is housed in the cell until it leaves the cell.

The virus is ejected by the cell, damaging a part of the cell, but not destroying it.

Viruses change every 72 hours.

Virus replication continues and every 72 hours the first strain is exhausted and an entirely new set of viruses is then manufactured by cells to continue the job of the previous, until the process is complete.

How Viruses are Manufactured | The True Processes of the Virus

Viruses do not infect healthy stable cells. They dissolve dead and decaying cells and tissue, dissolving them so that new cellular activity can thrive.

A good analogy:

Flies appear on dead matter but are not the cause of the dead matter. They are scavengers that break down dead matter. In this way, viruses and bacteria operate in the same exact manner within the body. Without scavengers on Earth to clean up waste, Earth’s air would become toxic. The same processes are carried out in the body on a microscopic macro level.

Science states the opposite of what reality dictates to us through our own observation of nature. This is impossible because our bodies are microcosms for the way nature operates outside our bodies. Assuming the opposite of this goes against our observable nature and is foolish.

Keep learning:

The Deception of Virology | Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious

The Deception of Virology & Vaccines | Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious | Read the proven facts about the true nature and function of viruses.

www.thebernician.net

 

[Thoth001]

A virus lacks the ability to replicate on its own;

It requires the assistance of a host cells’ duplicating equipment, in order to borrow enzymes and other molecules to concoct more viruses;

A virus is “not a living organism, it is simply a well-organised molecular messenger.” (Fabio Romero, Institute of Human Virology);

The human body has trillions of viruses and micro-organisms present, that live in our skin, intestines, mucous membranes…

The presence of a virus does not mean it is the cause of an illness;

We are breathing viruses, eating them, touching them.

No Clinical Virological research since 1933 has been able to demonstrate or prove a link between a virus and contagion. NOT ONE!

Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.

Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.

Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.

Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.

Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place. Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.

Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.

Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.

There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.

Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.

Viruses are very specific protein structures.

Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles. Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.

*Break*

So, if we wipe out humanity, the virus will die.

Animals also create viruses in their systems. After all we are also animals.

Yes, I was, of course, being pedantic. The virus is present in bats and they've just learned to deal with it. Hence why if you go to Yunnan, where there are lots of bats, and then take your bats or pangolins back to your virus center in a country with lax safety protocols, then there's a chance your virus will get out.

Or could it be where you are getting the bats from? From what I have researched the only way for an animal virus to jump to a human is if you are injected with it. In fact in earlier vaccines they were using monkey kidneys to create the serum in the vaccines. Among many other things. I have no doubt they have injected bat viruses into humans.

Is there any kind of experiment or proof that proves a bat virus jumped to a human by being around them or touching them. Surly you could pick up lice from them. And parasites, maybe even blood parasites like malaria.

 

[frigidweirdo]

A virus lacks the ability to replicate on its own;

It requires the assistance of a host cells’ duplicating equipment, in order to borrow enzymes and other molecules to concoct more viruses;

A virus is “not a living organism, it is simply a well-organised molecular messenger.” (Fabio Romero, Institute of Human Virology);

The human body has trillions of viruses and micro-organisms present, that live in our skin, intestines, mucous membranes…

The presence of a virus does not mean it is the cause of an illness;

We are breathing viruses, eating them, touching them.

No Clinical Virological research since 1933 has been able to demonstrate or prove a link between a virus and contagion. NOT ONE!

Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.

Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.

Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.

Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.

Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place. Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.

Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.

Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.

There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.

Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.

Viruses are very specific protein structures.

Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles. Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.

*Break*

So, if we wipe out humanity, the virus will die.

Animals also create viruses in their systems. After all we are also animals.

Yes, I was, of course, being pedantic. The virus is present in bats and they've just learned to deal with it. Hence why if you go to Yunnan, where there are lots of bats, and then take your bats or pangolins back to your virus center in a country with lax safety protocols, then there's a chance your virus will get out.

Or could it be where you are getting the bats from? From what I have researched the only way for an animal virus to jump to a human is if you are injected with it. In fact in earlier vaccines they were using monkey kidneys to create the serum in the vaccines. Among many other things. I have no doubt they have injected bat viruses into humans.

Is there any kind of experiment or proof that proves a bat virus jumped to a human by being around them or touching them. Surly you could pick up lice from them. And parasites, maybe even blood parasites like malaria.

Well, I'd say our understanding of cross species contamination of viruses is not known. Potentially this coronavirus has passed to humans many times. The human gets the virus but it doesn't then pass on to another human.

Perhaps China developed a biological weapon. This makes sense.
Perhaps China developed a biological weapon intended to research a vaccine, and then release the coronavirus at a later stage. Also makes sense.
Perhaps some scientists were merely doing their thing and the virus got out. There was a case of a vaccine getting out in Gansu province in China a year or two before and killed some people but didn't mutate to human to human transmission. Also possible.
Perhaps it was from people eating pangolins. Also possible.

The last one, if China accepts it, it's probably not true. Whatever the CCP says, will not be what happened. If they accept one thing, the reality is much worse.

 

[Thoth001]

 

[Thoth001]

 

[Thoth001]

A virus lacks the ability to replicate on its own;

It requires the assistance of a host cells’ duplicating equipment, in order to borrow enzymes and other molecules to concoct more viruses;

A virus is “not a living organism, it is simply a well-organised molecular messenger.” (Fabio Romero, Institute of Human Virology);

The human body has trillions of viruses and micro-organisms present, that live in our skin, intestines, mucous membranes…

The presence of a virus does not mean it is the cause of an illness;

We are breathing viruses, eating them, touching them.

No Clinical Virological research since 1933 has been able to demonstrate or prove a link between a virus and contagion. NOT ONE!

Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.

Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.

Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.

Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.

Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place. Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.

Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.

Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.

There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.

Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.

Viruses are very specific protein structures.

Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles. Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.

*Break*

So, if we wipe out humanity, the virus will die.

Animals also create viruses in their systems. After all we are also animals.

Yes, I was, of course, being pedantic. The virus is present in bats and they've just learned to deal with it. Hence why if you go to Yunnan, where there are lots of bats, and then take your bats or pangolins back to your virus center in a country with lax safety protocols, then there's a chance your virus will get out.

Or could it be where you are getting the bats from? From what I have researched the only way for an animal virus to jump to a human is if you are injected with it. In fact in earlier vaccines they were using monkey kidneys to create the serum in the vaccines. Among many other things. I have no doubt they have injected bat viruses into humans.

Is there any kind of experiment or proof that proves a bat virus jumped to a human by being around them or touching them. Surly you could pick up lice from them. And parasites, maybe even blood parasites like malaria.

Well, I'd say our understanding of cross species contamination of viruses is not known. Potentially this coronavirus has passed to humans many times. The human gets the virus but it doesn't then pass on to another human.

Perhaps China developed a biological weapon. This makes sense.
Perhaps China developed a biological weapon intended to research a vaccine, and then release the coronavirus at a later stage. Also makes sense.
Perhaps some scientists were merely doing their thing and the virus got out. There was a case of a vaccine getting out in Gansu province in China a year or two before and killed some people but didn't mutate to human to human transmission. Also possible.
Perhaps it was from people eating pangolins. Also possible.

The last one, if China accepts it, it's probably not true. Whatever the CCP says, will not be what happened. If they accept one thing, the reality is much worse.

Do you understand how many viruses are in a human? Not to mention the COVID had never been correctly isolated to show that it even exists.

Last year in starting my research it seemed to me that it was a biological weapon put out from China. But when you start to understand how much of a fraud germ theory is, you start to see a different picture. Think of this for a moment. Say maybe 100 people went to Chernobyl and never knew it was a Nuclear melt down. They would go there and all get sick. They may think that they are giving the sickness to each other and that it may be a virus that is spreading. But that we know since their was a nuclear melt down, so we know it's not a virus, but they would have no idea. That is where you kind of get into radiation and the 4G and 5G, not to mention the amount of pollution from all the factories in China.

And it can be easily seen that the US and China are in it together to create a hoax.

 

[frigidweirdo]

A virus lacks the ability to replicate on its own;

It requires the assistance of a host cells’ duplicating equipment, in order to borrow enzymes and other molecules to concoct more viruses;

A virus is “not a living organism, it is simply a well-organised molecular messenger.” (Fabio Romero, Institute of Human Virology);

The human body has trillions of viruses and micro-organisms present, that live in our skin, intestines, mucous membranes…

The presence of a virus does not mean it is the cause of an illness;

We are breathing viruses, eating them, touching them.

No Clinical Virological research since 1933 has been able to demonstrate or prove a link between a virus and contagion. NOT ONE!

Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.

Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.

Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.

Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.

Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place. Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.

Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.

Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.

There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.

Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.

Viruses are very specific protein structures.

Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles. Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.

*Break*

So, if we wipe out humanity, the virus will die.

Animals also create viruses in their systems. After all we are also animals.

Yes, I was, of course, being pedantic. The virus is present in bats and they've just learned to deal with it. Hence why if you go to Yunnan, where there are lots of bats, and then take your bats or pangolins back to your virus center in a country with lax safety protocols, then there's a chance your virus will get out.

Or could it be where you are getting the bats from? From what I have researched the only way for an animal virus to jump to a human is if you are injected with it. In fact in earlier vaccines they were using monkey kidneys to create the serum in the vaccines. Among many other things. I have no doubt they have injected bat viruses into humans.

Is there any kind of experiment or proof that proves a bat virus jumped to a human by being around them or touching them. Surly you could pick up lice from them. And parasites, maybe even blood parasites like malaria.

Well, I'd say our understanding of cross species contamination of viruses is not known. Potentially this coronavirus has passed to humans many times. The human gets the virus but it doesn't then pass on to another human.

Perhaps China developed a biological weapon. This makes sense.
Perhaps China developed a biological weapon intended to research a vaccine, and then release the coronavirus at a later stage. Also makes sense.
Perhaps some scientists were merely doing their thing and the virus got out. There was a case of a vaccine getting out in Gansu province in China a year or two before and killed some people but didn't mutate to human to human transmission. Also possible.
Perhaps it was from people eating pangolins. Also possible.

The last one, if China accepts it, it's probably not true. Whatever the CCP says, will not be what happened. If they accept one thing, the reality is much worse.

Do you understand how many viruses are in a human? Not to mention the COVID had never been correctly isolated to show that it even exists.

Last year in starting my research it seemed to me that it was a biological weapon put out from China. But when you start to understand how much of a fraud germ theory is, you start to see a different picture. Think of this for a moment. Say maybe 100 people went to Chernobyl and never knew it was a Nuclear melt down. They would go there and all get sick. They may think that they are giving the sickness to each other and that it may be a virus that is spreading. But that we know since their was a nuclear melt down, so we know it's not a virus, but they would have no idea. That is where you kind of get into radiation and the 4G and 5G, not to mention the amount of pollution from all the factories in China.

And it can be easily seen that the US and China are in it together to create a hoax.

Er.... I'm not really sure what your point is here.

We know the coronavirus is a virus. We know it was in bats

Identification of a Novel Coronavirus in Bats - PMC

Exotic wildlife can act as reservoirs of diseases that are endemic in the area or can be the source of new emerging diseases through interspecies transmission. The recent emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

" The animal surveillance program was performed between the summer of 2003 and the summer of 2004. The study was approved and supported by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China."

There's a nice chart about " Prevalence of Bat-Cov in animals"

 

[Thoth001]

A virus lacks the ability to replicate on its own;

It requires the assistance of a host cells’ duplicating equipment, in order to borrow enzymes and other molecules to concoct more viruses;

A virus is “not a living organism, it is simply a well-organised molecular messenger.” (Fabio Romero, Institute of Human Virology);

The human body has trillions of viruses and micro-organisms present, that live in our skin, intestines, mucous membranes…

The presence of a virus does not mean it is the cause of an illness;

We are breathing viruses, eating them, touching them.

No Clinical Virological research since 1933 has been able to demonstrate or prove a link between a virus and contagion. NOT ONE!

Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.

Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.

Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.

Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.

Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place. Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.

Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.

Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.

There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.

Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.

Viruses are very specific protein structures.

Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles. Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.

*Break*

So, if we wipe out humanity, the virus will die.

Animals also create viruses in their systems. After all we are also animals.

Yes, I was, of course, being pedantic. The virus is present in bats and they've just learned to deal with it. Hence why if you go to Yunnan, where there are lots of bats, and then take your bats or pangolins back to your virus center in a country with lax safety protocols, then there's a chance your virus will get out.

Or could it be where you are getting the bats from? From what I have researched the only way for an animal virus to jump to a human is if you are injected with it. In fact in earlier vaccines they were using monkey kidneys to create the serum in the vaccines. Among many other things. I have no doubt they have injected bat viruses into humans.

Is there any kind of experiment or proof that proves a bat virus jumped to a human by being around them or touching them. Surly you could pick up lice from them. And parasites, maybe even blood parasites like malaria.

Well, I'd say our understanding of cross species contamination of viruses is not known. Potentially this coronavirus has passed to humans many times. The human gets the virus but it doesn't then pass on to another human.

Perhaps China developed a biological weapon. This makes sense.
Perhaps China developed a biological weapon intended to research a vaccine, and then release the coronavirus at a later stage. Also makes sense.
Perhaps some scientists were merely doing their thing and the virus got out. There was a case of a vaccine getting out in Gansu province in China a year or two before and killed some people but didn't mutate to human to human transmission. Also possible.
Perhaps it was from people eating pangolins. Also possible.

The last one, if China accepts it, it's probably not true. Whatever the CCP says, will not be what happened. If they accept one thing, the reality is much worse.

Do you understand how many viruses are in a human? Not to mention the COVID had never been correctly isolated to show that it even exists.

Last year in starting my research it seemed to me that it was a biological weapon put out from China. But when you start to understand how much of a fraud germ theory is, you start to see a different picture. Think of this for a moment. Say maybe 100 people went to Chernobyl and never knew it was a Nuclear melt down. They would go there and all get sick. They may think that they are giving the sickness to each other and that it may be a virus that is spreading. But that we know since their was a nuclear melt down, so we know it's not a virus, but they would have no idea. That is where you kind of get into radiation and the 4G and 5G, not to mention the amount of pollution from all the factories in China.

And it can be easily seen that the US and China are in it together to create a hoax.

Er.... I'm not really sure what your point is here.

We know the coronavirus is a virus. We know it was in bats

Identification of a Novel Coronavirus in Bats - PMC

Exotic wildlife can act as reservoirs of diseases that are endemic in the area or can be the source of new emerging diseases through interspecies transmission. The recent emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

" The animal surveillance program was performed between the summer of 2003 and the summer of 2004. The study was approved and supported by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China."

There's a nice chart about " Prevalence of Bat-Cov in animals"

Again the COVID has never been isolated. There is absolutely no proof or experimentation to prove it exists. At this point it has become a cult :

Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI) – Dr Tom Cowan

Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)

Isolation: The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness.
– Oxford English Dictionary

The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified continues. However, using the above definition, common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’ existence can be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific consequences of this fact are:

• the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;
• the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
• “variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
• it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.

In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages1 and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.

These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues.2 (As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.)3
1 Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline lake Elmenteita, KenyaJuliah Khayeli Akhwale et al, PLOS One, Published: April 25, 2019. Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline lake Elmenteita, Kenya — accessed 2/15/21
2 “Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Apoptotic Cells: An Essential Link Between Death and Regeneration,” Maojiao Li1 et al, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020 October 2. Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Apoptotic Cells: An Essential Link Between Death and Regeneration — accessed 2/15/21
3 “The Role of Extraellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV and SARS Viruses,” Flavia Giannessi, et al, Viruses, 2020 May

If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an infectious agent.

None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.

Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.

The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.

From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for why actual isolation isn’t done:

1. There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.
2. Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.

If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible to find it?

Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into prison?

Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.

We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.

Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI) – Dr Tom Cowan

 

[jbrownson0831]

So you are not getting the vaccine.

Why would I do something as ridiculous as that? That is a big hell NO!

why not, you don't need to be concerned about autism? or asperger's?

Why would I get a vaccination for a virus when germ theory is a proven fraud? Viruses can't even be spread human to human and you CAN actually get a virus from an injection. I have absolutely no reason to trust big pharma or vaccine companies. I trust them as much as I do a psychopathic liar.

But you are free to go get injected but I DON"T recommend it at all. I do suggest for you dive down into what I posted and maybe learn something you didn't know.

Infectious Diseases – National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (nfid.org)

not all viruses are good to us!! Some cause disease and the covid 19 was not a hoax.

I already got mine, 2 doses of Moderna.

Why do people who get vaccinated always berate those who won't? Jealousy? You want everyone else to take the same risk as you? Don't understand how covid-1984 works? What?

Better for herd immunity, unless you want the covid 19 virus to last for years. I don't, thats why we get vaccinated.

Know It All who knows nothing

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Laboratories in US can’t find Covid-19 in 1500 positive tests | Principia Scientific Intl.

A clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a southern California laboratory says he and colleagues from 7 universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud. The reason: not one of 1500 samples of people tested “positive” could find Covid-19. ALL people were simply found to have Influenza...

principia-scientific.com

 

[phoenyx]

Laboratories in US can’t find Covid-19 in 1500 positive tests | Principia Scientific Intl.

A clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a southern California laboratory says he and colleagues from 7 universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud. The reason: not one of 1500 samples of people tested “positive” could find Covid-19. ALL people were simply found to have Influenza...

principia-scientific.com

As I mentioned elsewhere, if you go to the bottom of the article, you'll see "See more here: greatreject.org". That in turn takes you to the exact same article, but dated a few days before principia's, suggesting that it is the source. If you go to the bottom of -that- article, you'll see "Source". Their source was also published on the same day as the greatreject article and at the bottom of it are multiple references, strongly suggesting that it is the original article. The original article is in dutch, but my google chrome translates it to english with the press of a button, so it works for me at any rate. It is here:

‘Laboratoria in VS kunnen in niet één van 1500 positief getesten Covid-19 vinden’ – Xandernieuws

www.xandernieuws.net

Looking in the comments, I found a source article for Dr. Derek Knauss, plublished on April 10, a day before the dutch source article, here:

Home

Hal Turner Radio Show

halturnerradioshow.com

 

[Thoth001]

Laboratories in US can’t find Covid-19 in 1500 positive tests | Principia Scientific Intl.

A clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a southern California laboratory says he and colleagues from 7 universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud. The reason: not one of 1500 samples of people tested “positive” could find Covid-19. ALL people were simply found to have Influenza...

principia-scientific.com

Thanks for sharing!

 

[Thoth001]

Laboratories in US can’t find Covid-19 in 1500 positive tests | Principia Scientific Intl.

A clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a southern California laboratory says he and colleagues from 7 universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud. The reason: not one of 1500 samples of people tested “positive” could find Covid-19. ALL people were simply found to have Influenza...

principia-scientific.com

As I mentioned elsewhere, if you go to the bottom of the article, you'll see "See more here: greatreject.org". That in turn takes you to the exact same article, but dated a few days before principia's, suggesting that it is the source. If you go to the bottom of -that- article, you'll see "Source". Their source was also published on the same day as the greatreject article and at the bottom of it are multiple references, strongly suggesting that it is the original article. The original article is in dutch, but my google chrome translates it to english with the press of a button, so it works for me at any rate. It is here:

‘Laboratoria in VS kunnen in niet één van 1500 positief getesten Covid-19 vinden’ – Xandernieuws

www.xandernieuws.net

Looking in the comments, I found a source article for Dr. Derek Knauss, plublished on April 10, a day before the dutch source article, here:

Home

Hal Turner Radio Show

halturnerradioshow.com

Thanks for your input, and your great research!

 

[Thoth001]

Dr. Andrew Kaufman Refutes “Isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; He Does Step-by-Step Analysis of a Typical Claim of Isolation; There Is No Proof That the Virus Exists

The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.”

But what if the virus doesn’t exist?

People have been asking me for a step-by-step analysis of a mainstream claim of virus-isolation. Well, here it is.

“Isolation” should mean the virus has been separated out from all surrounding material, so researchers can say, “Look, we have it. It exists.”

I took a typical passage from a published study, a “methods” section, in which researchers describe how they “isolated the virus.” I sent it to Dr. Andrew Kaufman [1], and he provided his analysis in detail.

I found several studies that used very similar language in explaining how “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated.” For example, “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States, (Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 6 — June 2020)” [2].

First, I want to provide a bit of background that will help the reader understand what is going on in the study.

The researchers are creating a soup in the lab. This soup contains a number of compounds. The researchers assume, without evidence, that “the virus” is in this soup. At no time do they separate the purported virus from the surrounding material in the soup. Isolation of the virus is not occurring.

They set about showing that the monkey (and/or human cells) they put in the soup are dying. This cell-death, they claim, is being caused by “the virus.” However, as you’ll see, Dr. Kaufman dismantles this claim.

There is no reason to infer that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup at all, or that it is killing cells.

Finally, the researchers assert, with no proof or rational explanation, that they were able to discover the genetic sequence of “the virus.”

Here are the study’s statements claiming isolation, alternated with Dr. Kaufman’s analysis:

Dr. Andrew Kaufman Refutes “Isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; He Does Step-by-Step Analysis of a Typical Claim of Isolation; There Is No Proof That the Virus Exists

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News April 21, 2021 The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.” But what if the virus doesn’t exist?

truthcomestolight.com

Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus exists « Jon Rappoport's Blog

blog.nomorefakenews.com

 

[Thoth001]

The Fallacies of Germ Theory with Dr. Thomas Cowan

The Fallacies of Germ Theory with Dr. Thomas Cowan

Lieten to the full interview at the Solari Report - solari.com

ourtube.co.uk

 

[Thoth001]

Virus literally means poison

The idea of the virus as a protein poison was scientifically disproven and quietly abandoned in 1951. In order to test the assumption and assertion of toxin-viruses and to be allowed to claim them as scientific, two control experiments were conducted: 1. Healthy tissue was exposed to decomposition and not just tissue supposedly damaged by viruses. It was found that the proteins produced by the decomposition of healthy are the same as those produced by the decomposition of "virus-damaged" tissue. This refuted the virus assumption. 2. The protein toxin-virus assumption was additionally disproven by the fact that in the electron microscope of "virus diseased" humans, animals and their fluids the scientists could never find and photograph anything else than in healthy humans. This means that medical virology disproved itself.

Hence since 1952 another idea had to be invented: The idea that viruses are a collection of dangerous genes. The virologists who claim that viruses cause illness refer centrally to a single publication with which they justify what they do and pass it off as scientific. The authors. who published these considerations on June 1, 1954, have explicitly described their observations as speculations that have been refuted in themselves and that will only be verified in the future. To this day, the future verification has never taken place, because the first author of this study, Prof. John Franklin Enders, was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine on December 10, 1954. The new genetic virology from 1952 onward had two central basic principles: viruses that cause disease are in principle structured like phages and they would be created when cells die in the test tube after supposedly infected sample material is added to them.

Enders, his colleagues and all virologists overlooked that the death of the cells in the laboratory is not caused by a virus, but because the cells are unintentionally and unnoticed, but systematically, killed in the laboratory by poisoning with cell-toxic antibiotics, by extreme starvation by means of withdrawal of the nutrient solution and by the addition of decomposing proteins, which release toxic matabolic products.

Components from such cells dying in the laboratory are still today mentally combined to a virus and presented as reality.

The theory of disease-causing viruses is as simple as this.

Virologists have never isolated a complete genetic strand of a virus and displayed it directly, in its entire length.

Instead scientists isolate typical genetic sequences released by dying cells and tissues. These generally short genetic sequences, components of human metabolic processes, are the foundation of the subsequent laboratory work.

They always use very short pieces of nucleic acids, whose sequence consists of four molecules to determine them and call them sequences. From a multitude of millions of such specific, very short sequences, virologists mentally assemble a fictitious long genome strand with the help of complex computational and statistical methods.

These constructed RNA or DNA strands are then claimed to be real viral strands. However, such a complete strand never appears in reality and in scientific literature as a whole, although the simplest standard techniques have long been available to determine the length and composition of nucleic acids simply and directly.

Virologists argue that the constructed genome is from a virus because the alignment/gene sequencing was done with another, given viral genome.

This argument of the virologists can be easily refute by the fact that all templates with which new genetic material strands were generated theoretically/computationally were themselves generated theoretically/computationally and do not originate from a virus.