Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
as are you, and if you choose to believe that soccer moms driving SUVs are destroying the climate, go right ahead.
The climate of our planet is changing, it has been changing for millions of years and will be changing millions of years from now. Man has never, and will never, have anything to do with it.
Any yutz can offer the observation that x (whatever x might happen to be) has always been changing or has always been in the process of change. That's about as relevant as someone who's driving a car hard without doing proper maintenance remarking that all cars get old and all parts eventually wear out. While true, it doesn't alter the fact that not changing the oil regularly and driving a car hard will shorten its useful lifespan after causing expensive repairs along the way.
Of course humans can alter the climate if they alter the composition of the atmosphere in much the same way that humans can alter an ecosystem by polluting a lake, killing all the fish, and poisoning the wildlife in the food chain which just so happens to be what happened to the Great Lakes decades ago which is what ushered in environmental protection laws in the first place.
why is it that you libs can't understand the difference between pollution and climate change. Pollution is bad, pollution does not cause climate change.
See that big ball of fire in the sky? Its called the sun, it controls the climate of our planet, not whether we use incandescent bulbs or toxic curly bulbs made in china.
While conservative ignorance is nothing new, it IS a wonder to behold. I say that because the sun wouldn't and couldn't heat the Earth to a level that would allow life as we know it to flourish if it were not for greenhouse gases. Without CO2 in the atmosphere, the Earth would be several hundred degrees below zero. What that means is that messing with the NATURAL balance of CO2 by introducing massive quantities of the gas is potentially very dangerous once levels rise beyond a certain point. People have learned similar lessons on a local and regional level thought the introduction of too much salt on the roads to clear ice in the winter. It gets in the water table and can effect the ability of farmers to grow crops. They've found it out by over-fertilizing fields and discovered later that the run off could kill all the fish in lakes. They've found it out by clear cutting trees on mountains which ultimately led to mud slides due to the fact that no trees were there to soak up the water from the rains. It's called the law of unintended consequences because very often people don't clearly understand the ramifications of their actions. That's understandable. What's not understandable is why people continue on these paths once the dangers are known. That's just plain stupidity. That and greed.
thats all true. CO2 makes up .039% of the atmosphere. it is the same today as it was 100 million years ago.
Man is not causing the climate to change, man does not have that power. Try sunspots, a slight wobble on the earth's axis, ocean current variations. Those things affect climate, not using fossil fuels to improve the lives of human beings.
NOW PAY ATTENTION; POLLUTION IS BAD, POLLUTION SHOULD BE STOPPED, POLLUTION DOES NOT CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE.
Man has the power to dig up buried carbon (what we today call fossil fuels) that's been buried (AND out of circulation in the atmosphere) for millions of years and reintroduce it into the environment. In fact, it's those fossil fuels that have enabled man to change the face of the planet on a massive scale never dreamed of before by replacing horse power with horsepower. This has allowed humans to create machines which in turn can be used to build ever larger machines, all of which burn the fossil fuels we've unearthed.
Now, with that said, what was the CO2 level 150 years ago?
Al gore is an idiot, that's why their are international scientific bodies, climate scientists..What a glorious misunderstanding.as are you, and if you choose to believe that soccer moms driving SUVs are destroying the climate, go right ahead.
The climate of our planet is changing, it has been changing for millions of years and will be changing millions of years from now. Man has never, and will never, have anything to do with it.
Any yutz can offer the observation that x (whatever x might happen to be) has always been changing or has always been in the process of change. That's about as relevant as someone who's driving a car hard without doing proper maintenance remarking that all cars get old and all parts eventually wear out. While true, it doesn't alter the fact that not changing the oil regularly and driving a car hard will shorten its useful lifespan after causing expensive repairs along the way.
Of course humans can alter the climate if they alter the composition of the atmosphere in much the same way that humans can alter an ecosystem by polluting a lake, killing all the fish, and poisoning the wildlife in the food chain which just so happens to be what happened to the Great Lakes decades ago which is what ushered in environmental protection laws in the first place.
why is it that you libs can't understand the difference between pollution and climate change. Pollution is bad, pollution does not cause climate change.
See that big ball of fire in the sky? Its called the sun, it controls the climate of our planet, not whether we use incandescent bulbs or toxic curly bulbs made in china.
YES, that describes you quite accurately. Have you paid tribute to the great prophet algore yet today?
Oh so our government is not corrupted by money?
Kay guys, gotcha!
No consensus? You're full of shit. LOL, you know who's paying for bullshit studies? Oil, coal, the Koch fuckersAl gore is an idiot, that's why their are international scientific bodies, climate scientists..What a glorious misunderstanding.Any yutz can offer the observation that x (whatever x might happen to be) has always been changing or has always been in the process of change. That's about as relevant as someone who's driving a car hard without doing proper maintenance remarking that all cars get old and all parts eventually wear out. While true, it doesn't alter the fact that not changing the oil regularly and driving a car hard will shorten its useful lifespan after causing expensive repairs along the way.
Of course humans can alter the climate if they alter the composition of the atmosphere in much the same way that humans can alter an ecosystem by polluting a lake, killing all the fish, and poisoning the wildlife in the food chain which just so happens to be what happened to the Great Lakes decades ago which is what ushered in environmental protection laws in the first place.
why is it that you libs can't understand the difference between pollution and climate change. Pollution is bad, pollution does not cause climate change.
See that big ball of fire in the sky? Its called the sun, it controls the climate of our planet, not whether we use incandescent bulbs or toxic curly bulbs made in china.
YES, that describes you quite accurately. Have you paid tribute to the great prophet algore yet today?
yes he is and the real scientific community is divided on AGW. There is no consensus.
The real problem is that many scientists are PAID to do a study that will prove the theory of the people paying them.
No consensus? You're full of shit. LOL, you know who's paying for bullshit studies? Oil, coal, the Koch fuckersAl gore is an idiot, that's why their are international scientific bodies, climate scientists..What a glorious misunderstanding.why is it that you libs can't understand the difference between pollution and climate change. Pollution is bad, pollution does not cause climate change.
See that big ball of fire in the sky? Its called the sun, it controls the climate of our planet, not whether we use incandescent bulbs or toxic curly bulbs made in china.
YES, that describes you quite accurately. Have you paid tribute to the great prophet algore yet today?
yes he is and the real scientific community is divided on AGW. There is no consensus.
The real problem is that many scientists are PAID to do a study that will prove the theory of the people paying them.
They already have sufficient evidence and have proven it, deniers cherry pick already debunked studies and claim that the nut jobs like al gore represent the scientific community. It's not of any value? You're a fucking idiot, it's a real issue that needs to be addressed. Your peach orchards point is bullshit and you fail to understand climate change.No consensus? You're full of shit. LOL, you know who's paying for bullshit studies? Oil, coal, the Koch fuckersAl gore is an idiot, that's why their are international scientific bodies, climate scientists..What a glorious misunderstanding.
YES, that describes you quite accurately. Have you paid tribute to the great prophet algore yet today?
yes he is and the real scientific community is divided on AGW. There is no consensus.
The real problem is that many scientists are PAID to do a study that will prove the theory of the people paying them.
calm down, both sides are paying for studies, and bullshit comes in all forms.
the point is that no one can prove or disprove that the acts of man are changing the climate. It will be millions of years before anyone really knows and by then there will be no humans on earth. So its a nice debate, but its of absolutely no value and a total waste of time, money, and intellectual efforts.
So what if in the year 2525 there are peach orchards in Greenland? Who the fuck cares?
They already have sufficient evidence and have proven it, deniers cherry pick already debunked studies and claim that the nut jobs like al gore represent the scientific community. It's not of any value? You're a fucking idiot, it's a real issue that needs to be addressed. Your peach orchards point is bullshit and you fail to understand climate change.No consensus? You're full of shit. LOL, you know who's paying for bullshit studies? Oil, coal, the Koch fuckersAl gore is an idiot, that's why their are international scientific bodies, climate scientists..YES, that describes you quite accurately. Have you paid tribute to the great prophet algore yet today?
yes he is and the real scientific community is divided on AGW. There is no consensus.
The real problem is that many scientists are PAID to do a study that will prove the theory of the people paying them.
calm down, both sides are paying for studies, and bullshit comes in all forms.
the point is that no one can prove or disprove that the acts of man are changing the climate. It will be millions of years before anyone really knows and by then there will be no humans on earth. So its a nice debate, but its of absolutely no value and a total waste of time, money, and intellectual efforts.
So what if in the year 2525 there are peach orchards in Greenland? Who the fuck cares?
So with Islamic Extremists, liberals keep trying to defuse and blame religious extremism in general or even Christians who did the Crusades centuries ago. They bring up McVeigh who wasn't a Christian and didn't do it for religion as an endless counter example. The liberal media tries to hide the Muslim names of every Islamic nut job who murders or tries to murder more people. And they still want our border open even though Al Qaeda can fly to Mexico City and walk across our border.
Yet gay marriage, hat's their obsession in any gay thread, that and the right to force bakers to make them cakes for their ... gay weddings. They bring up gay marriage in economic threads, military and everything else. They equate blacks getting lynched and shot with water canons to gays not getting tax breaks. You'd think this is the greatest issue that ever faced mankind
I've already said al gore is an idiot who doesn't represent the scientific community, stop trying to speak for me. It's a scientific fact supported by all international scientific bodies. No evidence? LOL. You're literally full of shit.They already have sufficient evidence and have proven it, deniers cherry pick already debunked studies and claim that the nut jobs like al gore represent the scientific community. It's not of any value? You're a fucking idiot, it's a real issue that needs to be addressed. Your peach orchards point is bullshit and you fail to understand climate change.No consensus? You're full of shit. LOL, you know who's paying for bullshit studies? Oil, coal, the Koch fuckersAl gore is an idiot, that's why their are international scientific bodies, climate scientists..
yes he is and the real scientific community is divided on AGW. There is no consensus.
The real problem is that many scientists are PAID to do a study that will prove the theory of the people paying them.
calm down, both sides are paying for studies, and bullshit comes in all forms.
the point is that no one can prove or disprove that the acts of man are changing the climate. It will be millions of years before anyone really knows and by then there will be no humans on earth. So its a nice debate, but its of absolutely no value and a total waste of time, money, and intellectual efforts.
So what if in the year 2525 there are peach orchards in Greenland? Who the fuck cares?
OMG, you are such a gullible idiot. Your prophet algore said that florida would be under water by now and that the US would not see any more winter weather. He, and you, are full of shit.
This AGW fantasy is nothing but an attempt for more government control over our (and your) daily lives. If you choose to be a slave to the govt, go right ahead, I choose to think for myself.
As to evidence, there is no evidence that using fossil fuels has changed the climate. There is, however, valid evidence that sunspots have made temporary climate changes.
So with Islamic Extremists, liberals keep trying to defuse and blame religious extremism in general or even Christians who did the Crusades centuries ago. They bring up McVeigh who wasn't a Christian and didn't do it for religion as an endless counter example. The liberal media tries to hide the Muslim names of every Islamic nut job who murders or tries to murder more people. And they still want our border open even though Al Qaeda can fly to Mexico City and walk across our border.
Yet gay marriage, hat's their obsession in any gay thread, that and the right to force bakers to make them cakes for their ... gay weddings. They bring up gay marriage in economic threads, military and everything else. They equate blacks getting lynched and shot with water canons to gays not getting tax breaks. You'd think this is the greatest issue that ever faced mankind
American Muslims don't impose on the constitution like American Christians do. If there were Muslims running for president in America and they believed their religious freedom allowed them to discriminate, I would have the same angst towards them as I do Christian conservatives.
I've already said al gore is an idiot who doesn't represent the scientific community, stop trying to speak for me. It's a scientific fact supported by all international scientific bodies. No evidence? LOL. You're literally full of shit.They already have sufficient evidence and have proven it, deniers cherry pick already debunked studies and claim that the nut jobs like al gore represent the scientific community. It's not of any value? You're a fucking idiot, it's a real issue that needs to be addressed. Your peach orchards point is bullshit and you fail to understand climate change.No consensus? You're full of shit. LOL, you know who's paying for bullshit studies? Oil, coal, the Koch fuckersyes he is and the real scientific community is divided on AGW. There is no consensus.
The real problem is that many scientists are PAID to do a study that will prove the theory of the people paying them.
calm down, both sides are paying for studies, and bullshit comes in all forms.
the point is that no one can prove or disprove that the acts of man are changing the climate. It will be millions of years before anyone really knows and by then there will be no humans on earth. So its a nice debate, but its of absolutely no value and a total waste of time, money, and intellectual efforts.
So what if in the year 2525 there are peach orchards in Greenland? Who the fuck cares?
OMG, you are such a gullible idiot. Your prophet algore said that florida would be under water by now and that the US would not see any more winter weather. He, and you, are full of shit.
This AGW fantasy is nothing but an attempt for more government control over our (and your) daily lives. If you choose to be a slave to the govt, go right ahead, I choose to think for myself.
As to evidence, there is no evidence that using fossil fuels has changed the climate. There is, however, valid evidence that sunspots have made temporary climate changes.
Yes it has... You just want to ignore all of the evidence and rely on cherry picked claims supported by the cock brothers. Feel good? Be An idiot? Neil degrasse isn't an idiot.I've already said al gore is an idiot who doesn't represent the scientific community, stop trying to speak for me. It's a scientific fact supported by all international scientific bodies. No evidence? LOL. You're literally full of shit.They already have sufficient evidence and have proven it, deniers cherry pick already debunked studies and claim that the nut jobs like al gore represent the scientific community. It's not of any value? You're a fucking idiot, it's a real issue that needs to be addressed. Your peach orchards point is bullshit and you fail to understand climate change.No consensus? You're full of shit. LOL, you know who's paying for bullshit studies? Oil, coal, the Koch fuckers
calm down, both sides are paying for studies, and bullshit comes in all forms.
the point is that no one can prove or disprove that the acts of man are changing the climate. It will be millions of years before anyone really knows and by then there will be no humans on earth. So its a nice debate, but its of absolutely no value and a total waste of time, money, and intellectual efforts.
So what if in the year 2525 there are peach orchards in Greenland? Who the fuck cares?
OMG, you are such a gullible idiot. Your prophet algore said that florida would be under water by now and that the US would not see any more winter weather. He, and you, are full of shit.
This AGW fantasy is nothing but an attempt for more government control over our (and your) daily lives. If you choose to be a slave to the govt, go right ahead, I choose to think for myself.
As to evidence, there is no evidence that using fossil fuels has changed the climate. There is, however, valid evidence that sunspots have made temporary climate changes.
There has never been any valid proof that use of fossil fuels has changed the climate. No direct link has ever been proven.
A link has been established between fossil fuel use and pollution, but it has not been proven that pollution causes climate change.
but you are free to believe whatever makes you feeeeeeeeeeeeel good. You are free to be an idiot.
So with Islamic Extremists, liberals keep trying to defuse and blame religious extremism in general or even Christians who did the Crusades centuries ago. They bring up McVeigh who wasn't a Christian and didn't do it for religion as an endless counter example. The liberal media tries to hide the Muslim names of every Islamic nut job who murders or tries to murder more people. And they still want our border open even though Al Qaeda can fly to Mexico City and walk across our border.
Yet gay marriage, hat's their obsession in any gay thread, that and the right to force bakers to make them cakes for their ... gay weddings. They bring up gay marriage in economic threads, military and everything else. They equate blacks getting lynched and shot with water canons to gays not getting tax breaks. You'd think this is the greatest issue that ever faced mankind
American Muslims don't impose on the constitution like American Christians do. If there were Muslims running for president in America and they believed their religious freedom allowed them to discriminate, I would have the same angst towards them as I do Christian conservatives.
Having beliefs and living by them is not discrimination. If you choose to live in a muslim country, then you are subject to the beliefs and rules of that country.
Discrimination is defined by the rules that a society creates for itself. Our constitution and bill of rights were put in place and ratified by majority vote. Rights are created by majority vote.
The constitution and bill of rights are silent on gay marriage. The only way to settle it is to amend the constitution, or let each state decide by state referendum.
So with Islamic Extremists, liberals keep trying to defuse and blame religious extremism in general or even Christians who did the Crusades centuries ago. They bring up McVeigh who wasn't a Christian and didn't do it for religion as an endless counter example. The liberal media tries to hide the Muslim names of every Islamic nut job who murders or tries to murder more people. And they still want our border open even though Al Qaeda can fly to Mexico City and walk across our border.
Yet gay marriage, hat's their obsession in any gay thread, that and the right to force bakers to make them cakes for their ... gay weddings. They bring up gay marriage in economic threads, military and everything else. They equate blacks getting lynched and shot with water canons to gays not getting tax breaks. You'd think this is the greatest issue that ever faced mankind
American Muslims don't impose on the constitution like American Christians do. If there were Muslims running for president in America and they believed their religious freedom allowed them to discriminate, I would have the same angst towards them as I do Christian conservatives.
Having beliefs and living by them is not discrimination. If you choose to live in a muslim country, then you are subject to the beliefs and rules of that country.
Discrimination is defined by the rules that a society creates for itself. Our constitution and bill of rights were put in place and ratified by majority vote. Rights are created by majority vote.
The constitution and bill of rights are silent on gay marriage. The only way to settle it is to amend the constitution, or let each state decide by state referendum.
You can have all the beliefs you want, but if they violate the rights of others and they break the law you need to rethink your position.
With the constitution and the Bill of Rights silent on marriage period, it means that marriage is all inclusive. You can't assume that since marriage isn't mentioned that one type of marriage is legal and another type isn't.
Pardon me for being blunt.Oh so our government is not corrupted by money?
Kay guys, gotcha!
No one said that, what is wrong with you?
Our government IS corrupted by money. The idiocy is leftists like you say that, you are right, then ...
... you keep screaming for more government.
That is the problem
So with Islamic Extremists, liberals keep trying to defuse and blame religious extremism in general or even Christians who did the Crusades centuries ago. They bring up McVeigh who wasn't a Christian and didn't do it for religion as an endless counter example. The liberal media tries to hide the Muslim names of every Islamic nut job who murders or tries to murder more people. And they still want our border open even though Al Qaeda can fly to Mexico City and walk across our border.
Yet gay marriage, hat's their obsession in any gay thread, that and the right to force bakers to make them cakes for their ... gay weddings. They bring up gay marriage in economic threads, military and everything else. They equate blacks getting lynched and shot with water canons to gays not getting tax breaks. You'd think this is the greatest issue that ever faced mankind
American Muslims don't impose on the constitution like American Christians do. If there were Muslims running for president in America and they believed their religious freedom allowed them to discriminate, I would have the same angst towards them as I do Christian conservatives.
You can have all the beliefs you want, but if they violate the rights of others and they break the law you need to rethink your position.
With the constitution and the Bill of Rights silent on marriage period, it means that marriage is all inclusive. You can't assume that since marriage isn't mentioned that one type of marriage is legal and another type isn't.
So with Islamic Extremists, liberals keep trying to defuse and blame religious extremism in general or even Christians who did the Crusades centuries ago. They bring up McVeigh who wasn't a Christian and didn't do it for religion as an endless counter example. The liberal media tries to hide the Muslim names of every Islamic nut job who murders or tries to murder more people. And they still want our border open even though Al Qaeda can fly to Mexico City and walk across our border.
Yet gay marriage, hat's their obsession in any gay thread, that and the right to force bakers to make them cakes for their ... gay weddings. They bring up gay marriage in economic threads, military and everything else. They equate blacks getting lynched and shot with water canons to gays not getting tax breaks. You'd think this is the greatest issue that ever faced mankind
American Muslims don't impose on the constitution like American Christians do. If there were Muslims running for president in America and they believed their religious freedom allowed them to discriminate, I would have the same angst towards them as I do Christian conservatives.
Having beliefs and living by them is not discrimination. If you choose to live in a muslim country, then you are subject to the beliefs and rules of that country.
Discrimination is defined by the rules that a society creates for itself. Our constitution and bill of rights were put in place and ratified by majority vote. Rights are created by majority vote.
The constitution and bill of rights are silent on gay marriage. The only way to settle it is to amend the constitution, or let each state decide by state referendum.
You can have all the beliefs you want, but if they violate the rights of others and they break the law you need to rethink your position.
With the constitution and the Bill of Rights silent on marriage period, it means that marriage is all inclusive. You can't assume that since marriage isn't mentioned that one type of marriage is legal and another type isn't.
Thats the question---------is it legal or not? SCOTUS may make a ruling next month. If they rule against gay marriage will you shut up and accept the ruling of the highest court in the land?
Pardon me for being blunt.Oh so our government is not corrupted by money?
Kay guys, gotcha!
No one said that, what is wrong with you?
Our government IS corrupted by money. The idiocy is leftists like you say that, you are right, then ...
... you keep screaming for more government.
That is the problem
You dont know who the fuck I am.
Kay back to your chest beating strawman boxing match pussy.
