What? Convoluted FBI Pelosi Story: Pelosi Ran to Front Door to Open it for Police, Then Ran Back and Grabbed Hammer Held by DePape?

Status
Not open for further replies.

munkle

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2012
5,205
8,928
2,130
Sorry this doesn't add up. Page 6 of FBI report.


"DEPAPE stated that they went downstairs to the front door. The police arrived and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it. Pelosi grabbed onto DEPAPE’s hammer, which was in DEPAPE’s hand. At this point in the interview, DEPAPE repeated that DEPAPE did not plan to surrender and that he would go “through” Pelosi. DEPAPE stated that he pulled the hammer away from Pelosi and swung the hammer towards Pelosi. DEPAPE explained that Pelosi’s actions resulted in Pelosi “taking the punishment instead.”"


So they come downstairs, while they are arguing the police knock on the door, Pelosi runs over and and opens it, then runs back to the armed intruder? Not running out the door and shielding himself behind the cops and telling them Depape is an intruder?

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 

Attachments

  • 1667268248653.png
    1667268248653.png
    16 KB · Views: 11
Sorry this doesn't add up. Page 6 of FBI report.


"DEPAPE stated that they went downstairs to the front door. The police arrived and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it. Pelosi grabbed onto DEPAPE’s hammer, which was in DEPAPE’s hand. At this point in the interview, DEPAPE repeated that DEPAPE did not plan to surrender and that he would go “through” Pelosi. DEPAPE stated that he pulled the hammer away from Pelosi and swung the hammer towards Pelosi. DEPAPE explained that Pelosi’s actions resulted in Pelosi “taking the punishment instead.”"


So they come downstairs, while they are arguing the police knock on the door, Pelosi runs over and and opens it, then runs back to the armed intruder? Not running out the door and shielding himself behind the cops and telling them Depape is an intruder?

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
The Left is hoping that everyone is a dumb cultist Democrat who will believe anything.
They are attempting to control the narrative, but there are already too many holes in their story.
 

"DEPAPE stated that they went downstairs to the front door. The police arrived and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it. Pelosi grabbed onto DEPAPE’s hammer, which was in DEPAPE’s hand."


So they come downstairs, while they are arguing the police knock on the door, Pelosi runs over opens it, then runs back to his assailant? And grabs the hammer? Not running out the door and shielding himself behind the cops and telling them Depape is an intruder?
 
Last edited:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-r...nload?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

"DEPAPE stated that they went downstairs to the front door. The police arrived and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it. Pelosi grabbed onto DEPAPE’s hammer, which was in DEPAPE’s hand. At this point in the interview, DEPAPE repeated that DEPAPE did not plan to surrender and that he would go “through” Pelosi. DEPAPE stated that he pulled the hammer away from Pelosi and swung the hammer towards Pelosi. DEPAPE explained that Pelosi’s actions resulted in Pelosi “taking the punishment instead.”"

and
So they come downstairs, while they are arguing the police knock on the door, Pelosi runs over opens it, then runs back to his assailant? Not running out the door and shielding himself behind the cops and telling them Depape is an intruder?
:cuckoo: The article does not state nor in any way insinuate that Pelosi ran back to his assailant.

You need to check your reading comprehension skills.
 

"DEPAPE stated that they went downstairs to the front door. The police arrived and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it. Pelosi grabbed onto DEPAPE’s hammer, which was in DEPAPE’s hand. At this point in the interview, DEPAPE repeated that DEPAPE did not plan to surrender and that he would go “through” Pelosi. DEPAPE stated that he pulled the hammer away from Pelosi and swung the hammer towards Pelosi. DEPAPE explained that Pelosi’s actions resulted in Pelosi “taking the punishment instead.”"

and
So they come downstairs, while they are arguing the police knock on the door, Pelosi runs over opens it, then runs back to his assailant? Not running out the door and shielding himself behind the cops and telling them Depape is an intruder?

Odd, I just saw the SF police on TV a little while ago and they cannot even confirm, WHO opened the front door!
 
:cuckoo: The article does not state nor in any way insinuate that Pelosi ran back to his assailant.

You need to check your reading comprehension skills.

Nor does it say that DePape ran to the door with him. Would you be in favor of releasing the bodycam footage? That will tell us if anyone was in underwear which opens a whole new can of worms.
 
Odd, I just saw the SF police on TV a little while ago and they cannot even confirm, WHO opened the front door!

Look like the little junior FBI cover-up artist messed up. Now they have to start the story all over LOL :auiqs.jpg:
 
This incident is beginning to smell more and more like a cover-up. Kinda like Hunter Biden’s Laptop from Hell.

The locals and the FBI are rumored to be buying buckets and buckets of wihitewash as covering this fiasco up will be challenging. One thing that will help is the liberal press will not push hard to find our the real facts on this story. They will just blame the attack on Fox News And hate speech.
 
Nor does it say that DePape ran to the door with him. Would you be in favor of releasing the bodycam footage? That will tell us if anyone was in underwear which opens a whole new can of worms.
I'd like to see any bodycam footage they have. And any surveillance camera footage. And interrogation footage. It wouldn't surprise me at all if DePape signed away his rights and sang like a bird. Those crazy types tend to do that. And the crazier they are the more entertaining it is.

As far as wearing underwear, it's not unusual at all for people to sleep in their underwear. So that adequately explains why Pelosi was in his underwear. After all, it was 2:30 AM.

It's also not unusual for a criminal planning on committing a bloody crime (like beating someone to death with a hammer) to strip before breaking into the victim's home in the middle of the night. And it would be evidence of premeditation.

So far I've seen no reports of whether or not the police ever found DePape's clothes. But they did say he had a backpack. Maybe he put them in there so that he wouldn't get blood splattered all over them.

Or maybe he walked to the scene of the crime in his underwear. After all, the guy is known to be a nudists' rights activist who thinks it's unconstitutional for the government to make laws against public nudity. :dunno:
 
Hide it in the closet


Is the second democrat platform after the first


Truth is stupid
 
What they have on tape would not assist the underwear issue in Pelosis favor therefore that fact Must Be Hidden.
 
Hide it in the closet


Is the second democrat platform after the first


Truth is stupid
That's the old platform.

Now, it's:
1) Prance out of the closet in a wig, rock out with your cock out, flop it around a grandma & touch as many kids as you can.

2) Butcher as many babies as possible.

3) Crash the country over cow farts & flu's while blaming it all on someone else.

That's it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top