What!? Charlie Kirk Didn't Have An Autopsy!?

I'm not apt to buy into YouTube videos. A head shot and neck shot are two different things

Yes, the neck is even more delicate than the head. Which is all the more reason why the official story that it was a .30-06 is ridiculous.
 
The head and neck are connected by the spine though.

For the record the reason why I brought this up is because I forget which video it was but somebody actually brought up the theory that Kirk was actually shot in the back of the head and not the neck.
 
The head and neck are connected by the spine though.

It's obvious he was shot. The video good grief. Not everything has to be a conspiracy

I've watched my husband and sons fire a .223 at pumpkins. Every shot is a different result. Some explode due to hydro shock, others go through on edges.
 
If it was the gay boy, why did Robinson tell him he took out Kirk?


I thought that she was talking about Robinson as he's obviously gay too you know. You know although I wouldn't condone it but I'm finally starting to see why they execute the gays in Palestine. Not like I'm saying that all gays are prone to violence but I'm just saying...
 
It's obvious he was shot. The video good grief. Not everything has to be a conspiracy

I've watched my husband and sons fire a .223 at pumpkins. Every shot is a different result. Some explode due to hydro shock, others go through on edges.


Read post #102 to get my point, but yes I agree with you that not everything has to be a conspiracy theory.
 
Yes, the neck is even more delicate than the head. Which is all the more reason why the official story that it was a .30-06 is ridiculous.

Probably why it went straight through

You're sniffing but can't find anything
 
Probably why it went straight through

You're sniffing but can't find anything

It didn't go straight through! It sounds like you haven't looked into the details of this whole case. They're saying the bullet didn't go all the way through, and there was no exit wound.

That same type of bullet blows through an elk easily, which has much denser bones than a human. The bones in the back of the neck are relatively delicate.... which again, is all the more reason why the official claim is absurd.
 
Obviously, a missed spelling error or a typo.

Quarts.

Hey, I make many typos due to careless editing or failing to edit at all. I believe most of us do. Even you.

And, as you do, I sometimes highlight those errors by others. But for Pete’s sake, try to spend more time focusing on substance instead of marking student papers for spelling mistakes.

(By the way, I’m not editing this post, so if you discover a mistake, it’s ok for you to take out your red pen.)

Now, back ON topic:

I did an AI search and i still cannot find any reliable information about whether an autopsy was or was not performed OR whether the bullet which was allegedly recovered from Mr. Kirk’s body at the hospital was turned over to law enforcement for ballistics analysis.
 
Well my brain is going two opposite ways here. Did they perform the autopsy or just didn't tell us or are they trying to cover something up here? 🤔
 
It didn't go straight through! It sounds like you haven't looked into the details of this whole case. They're saying the bullet didn't go all the way through, and there was no exit wound.

That same type of bullet blows through an elk easily, which has much denser bones than a human. The bones in the back of the neck are relatively delicate.... which again, is all the more reason why the official claim is absurd.

Post a link from a reliable source.

That hasn't been released and saying "they are saying" is stupid
 
The bones in the back of the neck are relatively delicate.... which again, is all the more reason why the official claim is absurd.
Yet the same cartridge was used on MLK and was stopped and lodged in neck.
 
15th post
Well my brain is going two opposite ways here. Did they perform the autopsy or just didn't tell us or are they trying to cover something up here? 🤔
The absence of any public statement justifies your ambivalence.

However, my guess is that Utah law enforcement officials (or the FBI?) took custody of the recovered round from the hospital. And that evidence would be properly recorded for purposes of chain of custody.

Then it would go to a law enforcement forensic laboratory to obtain the ballistic information which could be (and may have already been) compared to the alleged murder weapon.

It also does strike me as at least a bit odd that the round didn’t go right through Charlie Kirk’s neck. Perhaps the rifle cartridge had less gunpowder in it than the standard amount? I don’t know. But it is a bit strange.
 
I don't recall caring. Public message board. Feel free to put me on ignore.
I think it more appropriate to put you on ignore because you screen name is offensive given your hypocricy on so many fronts. You don't represent Him well at all.

Ignore it is.
 
I think it more appropriate to put you on ignore because you screen name is offensive given your hypocricy on so many fronts. You don't represent Him well at all.

Ignore it is.

1759341597682.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom