We've moved to the theater of the absurd.

[berg80]

And they cheer it all. The more damage the better. Just to own da libs.

Inexplicable.

Great cartoon.

 

[berg80]

We just got over the theater of the absurd. Remember, Biden was sharp as a tack. LOL

The shelf life for that whataboutism expired when he dropped out of the race.

 

[Meathead]

The shelf life for that whataboutism expired when he dropped out of the race.

Biden being sharp as a tack was the theater of the absurd, surely.

 

[berg80]

I suppose you're one of those stupid libs that are broadcasting that Girl Scout cookies are toxic.

I love those mint chocolate cookies.

While leading the chemistry council’s fight to limit formaldehyde regulation, Dr. Dekleva called for investigations of federal officials for potential bias. The industry group used freedom of information laws to obtain emails of federal employees and criticized them in public statements for what they had written. It submitted dozens of industry-funded research papers to agencies that minimized the risks of formaldehyde.

 

[berg80]

Biden being sharp as a tack was the theater of the absurd, surely.

Medical Management Guidelines for Formaldehyde​

Formaldehyde | Medical Management Guidelines | Toxic Substance Portal | ATSDR

wwwn.cdc.gov

Breathe deep nitwits.

 

[berg80]

Libs already brought us insane theatre when they couldn't figure out what a woman was and cheering kids cutting off body parts to pretend they were something that they weren't. Naw buddy, the absurd is ALL you.

Formaldehyde’s cancer risk​

Formaldehyde’s fumes can cause wheezing and a burning sensation in the eyes, especially when they accumulate indoors. That danger was apparent when formaldehyde in plywood used to build temporary trailer homes for victims of Hurricane Katrina sickened dozens of people.

And there are longer-term dangers, namely several types of cancers. The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded in 2004 that the chemical is a human carcinogen, and the U.S. Department of Health listed it as a human carcinogen in 2011.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Formaldehyde, the chemical of choice for undertakers and embalmers, is also used in products like furniture and clothes. But it can also cause cancer and severe respiratory problems. So, in 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency began a new effort to regulate it.

Regulate it down to what level?

PPM?

PPB?

 

[Concerned American]

Formaldehyde’s cancer risk​

Formaldehyde’s fumes can cause wheezing and a burning sensation in the eyes, especially when they accumulate indoors. That danger was apparent when formaldehyde in plywood used to build temporary trailer homes for victims of Hurricane Katrina sickened dozens of people.

And there are longer-term dangers, namely several types of cancers. The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Can

Living in NW MT causes mesothelioma. OUTLAW NW MT!

 

[berg80]

Biden being sharp as a tack was the theater of the absurd, surely.

EPA is attempting to unravel a landmark scientific finding that underpins its climate change regulations.

Administrator Lee Zeldin urged the White House last week in an undisclosed recommendation to let EPA challenge the 2009 endangerment finding, according to three people who were granted anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the decision. The finding gave the agency its authority to regulate greenhouse gases based on the threat they pose to public health or welfare.

Loading…

www.politico.com

Repeat after me. Greenhouse gases don't cause climate change, formaldehyde is perfectly safe, Jan. 6 was a lovefest........

 

[berg80]

Living in NW MT causes mesothelioma. OUTLAW NW MT!

See post #12.

 

[Independent thinker]

She Lobbied for a Carcinogen. Now She’s at the E.P.A., Approving New Chemicals.​

Formaldehyde, the chemical of choice for undertakers and embalmers, is also used in products like furniture and clothes. But it can also cause cancer and severe respiratory problems. So, in 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency began a new effort to regulate it.

The chemicals industry fought back with an intensity that astonished even seasoned agency officials. Its campaign was led by Lynn Dekleva, then a lobbyist at the American Chemistry Council, an industry group that spends millions of dollars on government lobbying.

Dr. Dekleva is now at the E.P.A. in a crucial job: She runs an office that has the authority to approve new chemicals for use. Earlier she spent 32 years at Dupont, the chemical maker, before joining the E.P.A. in the first Trump administration.

She Lobbied for a Carcinogen. Now She’s at the E.P.A., Approving New Chemicals.

Lynn Dekleva, who recently took a senior role at the agency, once led an aggressive effort by industry to block regulations on formaldehyde.

www.nytimes.com

Since these guys obviously didn't prepare the new admin for success during the leadup to trump 2.0 it would appear they spent a lot of time getting ready to gaslight the country.

That's been happening for the previous eight years.

 

[martybegan]

Formaldehyde’s cancer risk​

Formaldehyde’s fumes can cause wheezing and a burning sensation in the eyes, especially when they accumulate indoors. That danger was apparent when formaldehyde in plywood used to build temporary trailer homes for victims of Hurricane Katrina sickened dozens of people.

And there are longer-term dangers, namely several types of cancers. The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded in 2004 that the chemical is a human carcinogen, and the U.S. Department of Health listed it as a human carcinogen in 2011.

So can Clorox. are we going to ban household bleach?

 

[struth]

The shelf life for that whataboutism expired when he dropped out of the race.

He dropped out because Trump destroyed him in the debate

The reality is for weeks after you all continue the narrative he was sharp, because you are dembot sheep and not able to actually think.

Hence why we can’t take any of your comment seriously

 

[berg80]

That's been happening for the previous eight years.

Industry lobbyists working to remove regulations on harmful chemicals have been appointed to positions at the EPA for eight years?

 

[berg80]

The Trump administration and Republicans in Congress are preparing an unusual legislative maneuver in an effort to eliminate one of the country’s most ambitious climate policies, an order that was designed to shift the auto industry toward electric cars.

They plan to vote to overturn a California ban on the sale of new gasoline-powered cars in that state by 2035. To do it, they intend to use the Congressional Review Act, a 1996 law that permits lawmakers to reverse recently-adopted regulations with a simple majority vote.

But the California ban is not a federal regulation, it’s a different animal. It’s the result of a waiver that was granted by the Biden administration under the 1970 Clean Air Act, something that has been done more than a hundred times over the years by administrations of both parties. And it is not subject to congressional review, according to a 2023 decision by the Government Accountability Office.

Environmental groups and California officials say the Republican plan to try to kill the waiver with a congressional vote would be illegal.

Trump’s Plan to Repeal Climate Policy Could Upend Shift to Electric Cars

The administration is setting the stage for Congress to repeal a longstanding waiver that allows California to set its own pollution standards. State officials say the effort is illegal.

www.nytimes.com

There is no illegal act that trump doesn't like.

 

[MisterBeale]

Her most recent employer, the chemicals lobbying group, has made reversing the Environmental Protection Agency’s course on formaldehyde a priority and is pushing to abolish a program under which the agency assess the risks of chemicals to human health. In recent weeks it has urged the agency to discard its work on formaldehyde entirely and start from scratch in assessing the risks.

If she is so awful, why didn't the Biden administration give her walking papers?

Lynn DeKleva | Trump Town

Track White House Staff, Cabinet Members and Political Appointees Across the Government

projects.propublica.org

 

[berg80]

If she is so awful, why didn't the Biden administration give her walking papers?

Lynn DeKleva | Trump Town

Track White House Staff, Cabinet Members and Political Appointees Across the Government

projects.propublica.org

Looks like she worked for the EPA during trump 1.0.

 

[MisterBeale]

Looks like she worked for the EPA during trump 1.0.

If she is so awful, why didn't the Biden administration give her walking papers?

 

[berg80]

If she is so awful, why didn't the Biden administration give her walking papers?

Please prove to me she worked for EPA while Biden was prez. The document you posted referred to 2018.

 

[22lcidw]

The shelf life for that whataboutism expired when he dropped out of the race.

The shelf life should have never started. That election was stolen. You messed with someone who thrives with this. He has put a stake into many of his political enemies. Nancy will limp off to the sunset as she has gotten karma returned even though she will be lionized by the stage loving Progs.