We've had l;iberals moderate a Republican debate. So when will conservatives moderate a Dem debate?

[amrchaos]

How are they going to defeat terrorists if they can't defeat hard questions?

I agree. Back to Milk Toast Romney and McCain they just "took it". Mushy-headed RINO go-along get-along.

Why don't the Candidate(s) simply say "that is a ridiculous gotcha question" and proceed to talk about whatever important topic? Why play along? What "they" gonna do? Cut the Mic? Police Usher you offstage?

Get tough, $20T headed for another financial collapse. We had 8 years RINO and 8 years commie. No mas!

No ref! No ref!
It is a fight to our death

 

[Arianrhod]

I think telling the voters that we will abolish ssi, medicare, educational department and slash funding for everything is likely to turn a lot of people off. I wouldn't be honest as republican ideas are shit.

When were those questions brought up during the debate?

See, now those are the questions your hand-picked moderators should ask. A lefty thought of them and you couldn't.

 

[bripat9643]

It's still a complete joke trying to make CNBC into a liberal hack station....

How do you figure?

 

[bripat9643]

"We've had l;iberals moderate a Republican debate."

The stupidity of this speaks for itself.

Since when are obvious facts "stupid?"

 

[bripat9643]

Nowhere in post #1 (OP) is the word conservative used.

Somewhere along the way some plagiarist liberal modified part of the OP and you were foolish enough to quote that.

Nonsense. A liberal would have corrected the word "l;iberal." You're making a very serious allegation there, and of course you can't prove it.

It's always a kick to see the resident liberals whining, "How can they defeat terrorists if they can't even answer hard questions" or something along those lines...

...while carefully avoiding any chance of their candidates entering a debate where Republicans or conservatives ask the questions.

Do these people even realize how ridiculous they look?

What's ridiculous is someone who asks for feedback and then ignores it to create their own little echo chamber.

Let's say you got to pick the Dream Team of "safe" conservative moderators. Who would they be and what questions would they ask?

Please ignore this post as you have all the others.

When did anyone ask you for "feedback?"

 

[NYcarbineer]

We've had a debate between Republicans with outright leftist political hacks asking the questions.

When will we have a debate between Hillary, Bernie, and the usual suspects held with Pat Buchanan, Sean Hannity, Jeanine Pirro, and Charles Krauthammer asking the questions and the followups?

If you can't handle a question from Becky Quick, how will you be negotiating with Putin?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Maybe Breitbart can host a GOP debate and the ghost of Andrew Breitbart can ask all the questions.

 

[bripat9643]

We've had a debate between Republicans with outright leftist political hacks asking the questions.

When will we have a debate between Hillary, Bernie, and the usual suspects held with Pat Buchanan, Sean Hannity, Jeanine Pirro, and Charles Krauthammer asking the questions and the followups?

Looks like no liberals want to address the question so far.

Not so. You're just not getting the answers you want. Life doesn't work that way.

We understand leftwing turds with never respond to a straight question with a straight answer. We just want to watch you squirm as you try to weasel out of it.

Since you have yet to offer anything but insults, you apparently expect insults in return. Would that excite you?

Insults is what you've earned. You don't actually believe your posts are anything more than trolling, do you?

 

[Arianrhod]

Nowhere in post #1 (OP) is the word conservative used.

Somewhere along the way some plagiarist liberal modified part of the OP and you were foolish enough to quote that.

Nonsense. A liberal would have corrected the word "l;iberal." You're making a very serious allegation there, and of course you can't prove it.

It's always a kick to see the resident liberals whining, "How can they defeat terrorists if they can't even answer hard questions" or something along those lines...

...while carefully avoiding any chance of their candidates entering a debate where Republicans or conservatives ask the questions.

Do these people even realize how ridiculous they look?

What's ridiculous is someone who asks for feedback and then ignores it to create their own little echo chamber.

Let's say you got to pick the Dream Team of "safe" conservative moderators. Who would they be and what questions would they ask?

Please ignore this post as you have all the others.

When did anyone ask you for "feedback?"

Great post! Full of on-topic content. Keep up the good work!

 

[Deleted member 53821]

All of those people are RINO's.

why do liberals like to see white men getting raped by gays?

 

[Deleted member 53821]

Liberals are smart enough to avoid such obvious traps. Republicans are naive enough to believe everyone is honest.

 

[TheOldSchool]

All of those people are RINO's.

why do liberals like to see white men getting raped by gays?

Go to bed RINO.

 

[bripat9643]

Nowhere in post #1 (OP) is the word conservative used.

Somewhere along the way some plagiarist liberal modified part of the OP and you were foolish enough to quote that.

Nonsense. A liberal would have corrected the word "l;iberal." You're making a very serious allegation there, and of course you can't prove it.

It's always a kick to see the resident liberals whining, "How can they defeat terrorists if they can't even answer hard questions" or something along those lines...

...while carefully avoiding any chance of their candidates entering a debate where Republicans or conservatives ask the questions.

Do these people even realize how ridiculous they look?

What's ridiculous is someone who asks for feedback and then ignores it to create their own little echo chamber.

Let's say you got to pick the Dream Team of "safe" conservative moderators. Who would they be and what questions would they ask?

Please ignore this post as you have all the others.

When did anyone ask you for "feedback?"

Great post! Full of on-topic content. Keep up the good work!

I'll take that to mean "never."

 

[Arianrhod]

Nowhere in post #1 (OP) is the word conservative used.

Somewhere along the way some plagiarist liberal modified part of the OP and you were foolish enough to quote that.

Nonsense. A liberal would have corrected the word "l;iberal." You're making a very serious allegation there, and of course you can't prove it.

It's always a kick to see the resident liberals whining, "How can they defeat terrorists if they can't even answer hard questions" or something along those lines...

...while carefully avoiding any chance of their candidates entering a debate where Republicans or conservatives ask the questions.

Do these people even realize how ridiculous they look?

What's ridiculous is someone who asks for feedback and then ignores it to create their own little echo chamber.

Let's say you got to pick the Dream Team of "safe" conservative moderators. Who would they be and what questions would they ask?

Please ignore this post as you have all the others.

When did anyone ask you for "feedback?"

Great post! Full of on-topic content. Keep up the good work!

I'll take that to mean "never."

If you insist on writing your own scripts, you don't really need other posters. You're kind of a microcosm of this thread: "I'm going to ask questions and then not listen to the answers."

This thread, in turn, is a microcosm of the macrocosm that is a splinter group of the GOP...the one that is making this debate process ever more ludicrous with each passing day.

The entire party may not be moribund, but this nonsense is pushing it closer to the edge. The real Republicans are rolling in their graves.

 

[kaz]

How are they going to defeat terrorists if they can't defeat hard questions?

Good question. I have a question about Democrats for you. How are they going to defeat terrorists if they can't defeat hard questions?

Here's one for Obama. Why are you fighting on the same side with ISIS?

 

[bripat9643]

Nowhere in post #1 (OP) is the word conservative used.

Somewhere along the way some plagiarist liberal modified part of the OP and you were foolish enough to quote that.

Nonsense. A liberal would have corrected the word "l;iberal." You're making a very serious allegation there, and of course you can't prove it.

It's always a kick to see the resident liberals whining, "How can they defeat terrorists if they can't even answer hard questions" or something along those lines...

...while carefully avoiding any chance of their candidates entering a debate where Republicans or conservatives ask the questions.

Do these people even realize how ridiculous they look?

What's ridiculous is someone who asks for feedback and then ignores it to create their own little echo chamber.

Let's say you got to pick the Dream Team of "safe" conservative moderators. Who would they be and what questions would they ask?

Please ignore this post as you have all the others.

When did anyone ask you for "feedback?"

Great post! Full of on-topic content. Keep up the good work!

I'll take that to mean "never."

If you insist on writing your own scripts, you don't really need other posters. You're kind of a microcosm of this thread: "I'm going to ask questions and then not listen to the answers."

This thread, in turn, is a microcosm of the macrocosm that is a splinter group of the GOP...the one that is making this debate process ever more ludicrous with each passing day.

The entire party may not be moribund, but this nonsense is pushing it closer to the edge. The real Republicans are rolling in their graves.

His question was purely rhetorical. He wasn't looking for any "feedback," at least not from the likes of you.

All your statements about "safe" conservative moderators are bullshit because we all know you would never want to subject Democrats candidates to the same treatment. The so-called "moderators" were nothing more than a Democrat hit squad who's goal was to damage the Republican candidates as much as possible. Pretending like this was some kind of legitimate political exercise is only fooling the mentally retarded

When the Democrats have a debate hosted by FOX News, perhaps then someone might take you whining seriously. Otherwise we just write it off as more of the usual DNC talking points.

 

[browsing deer]

The moderators wouldn't dare ask substantive questions of the candidates. The republican candidates would all get polling better than Hillary.

 

[Mac1958]

All of those people are RINO's.

Sean Hannity is a RINO?
.

 

[Arianrhod]

Nonsense. A liberal would have corrected the word "l;iberal." You're making a very serious allegation there, and of course you can't prove it.What's ridiculous is someone who asks for feedback and then ignores it to create their own little echo chamber.

Let's say you got to pick the Dream Team of "safe" conservative moderators. Who would they be and what questions would they ask?

Please ignore this post as you have all the others.

When did anyone ask you for "feedback?"

Great post! Full of on-topic content. Keep up the good work!

I'll take that to mean "never."

If you insist on writing your own scripts, you don't really need other posters. You're kind of a microcosm of this thread: "I'm going to ask questions and then not listen to the answers."

This thread, in turn, is a microcosm of the macrocosm that is a splinter group of the GOP...the one that is making this debate process ever more ludicrous with each passing day.

The entire party may not be moribund, but this nonsense is pushing it closer to the edge. The real Republicans are rolling in their graves.

His question was purely rhetorical. He wasn't looking for any "feedback," at least not from the likes of you.

All your statements about "safe" conservative moderators are bullshit because we all know you would never want to subject Democrats candidates to the same treatment.

Who's "we," Miss Cleo? Can you link to a post where I said that or anything even remotely like it? Take your time.

 

[my2¢]

Why not demand competency rather than look for something just as bad as CNBC?

So far only CNN has been ready for primetime. Of the 3 debates CNN has been the one where the panel wasn't making headlines afterward.