Well the liberals poked a lion

[IDIOCRACY]

Probably everyone who isn't MAGA. The reason we can and you can't? The same...it's the truth--aka kryptonite to MAGA.

No, but really...when was the last time liberal Democrats were right about something?

 

[Dorian Mode]

Democrats to claim the Epstein files are FAKE right after they implicate vast numbers of high ranking Democrats.

Get ready for a whole new level of spin coming out of the democraps. New excuses, and they will quickly create another hoax to get Trump with.

 

[g5000]

Get ready for a whole new level of spin coming out of the democraps. New excuses, and they will quickly create another hoax to get Trump with.

Attorney General Told Trump His Name Appeared in Epstein Files​

Watch Bondi disappear that shit just like she disappeared the Epstein Client List from her desk.

Of course she will only release any information about anyone on Trump's Enemies List so you tards can all have a feeding frenzy and invent more conspiracy theories.

Of course.

Just as I have predicted, she is already claiming not all files will be released despite the bill passing Congress and signed by Trump.

Golly! What as surprise!

But the voting public is not going to be fooled this time.

 

[BackAgain]

As a supporter of the Republican Party, I feel a sense of embarrassment. The Democrats have played their Trump card, revealing Pam, Cash, Dan, Donald, and numerous others as liars and "nutters". I have a particular sense of sympathy for MTG. What a humiliation.

lol. A supporter of the Republican Party.

Sure.

 

[Care4all]

Sounds an awful lot like waiting until the ball lands and then moving the goalposts over it.

Now law enforcement will decide which parts of the Epstein files relate to an ongoing investigation. That is in the law that Trump will soon sign, passed nearly unanimously by the House and Senate.

Will you object to the DOJ/FBI's decisions?

Or will you honor the law?

None relate to an on going Epstein investigation....didn't Bondi and Kash tell us ALL, that there were no further investigations or suspects in to the Epstein case and files.... several months back, and that is what really pissed Trumpers off at them? And now there are investigations conjured up to stop the release of the Trump/Epstein files??

This is how CROOKED your Trump administration is that you seem overjoyed with...

Just an FYI....an investigation can not stop the full Oversight committees in the House and Senate, from getting the unredacted Epstein files in full.

All of congress may not get them, but the Oversight Committee members will get them, under the law.

 

[g5000]

None relate to an on going Epstein investigation....didn't Bondi and Kash tell us ALL, that there were no further investigations or suspects in to the Epstein case and files.... several months back, and that is what really pissed Trumpers off at them? And now there are investigations conjured up to stop the release of the Trump/Epstein files??

.
Eggs-actly!
.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Attorney General Told Trump His Name Appeared in Epstein Files​

Watch Bondi disappear that shit just like she disappeared the Epstein Client List from her desk.

Of course she will only release any information about anyone on Trump's Enemies List so you tards can all have a feeding frenzy and invent more conspiracy theories.

Of course.

Just as I have predicted, she is already claiming not all files will be released despite the bill passing Congress and signed by Trump.

Golly! What as surprise!

But the voting public is not going to be fooled this time.

Right on cue. You neo-leftists are so one dimensional and predictable. Carry on devoting your whole day to Trump. He owns you.

 

[elektra]

I can tell you who.....

Spoiled rotten socialites,

Fuckheads,

and

Pending maturity, one can only hope

Pure marxists

 

[SaxonJackson]

Funny how this only became important to them when Trump was reelected. Kind of rings like "show your taxes", but on another level.....Careful what you wish for. Don't ask questions you don't want an answer to, and so on.

What are liberals right about anyway?

View attachment 1185895

Hey Trump ... you know who else donates $Millions of dollars to the Democrat Party? Israel's lobby, AIPAC!!! Want to know how much bribe money Biden received from AIPAC? $4,226,576
Hillary Clinton? $2,352,302
Kamala Harris? $2,346,605
Joe Lieberman? $1,997,774
Chuck Schumer? $1,727,974
Adam Schiff? $1,233,039

Don't play dumb, Trumpanyahu.

Pro-Israel Recipients

See aggregated party breakdowns and incumbency status of recipients of contributions from Pro-Israel industries/interest groups for every election cycle from 1998 to 2024.

www.opensecrets.org

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

The DOJ has had custody of the files since Dotard took office. The language about an ongoing investigation is boilerplate stuff that would not come in to play had Don not decided to open the probe in to D's as a diversion. You are criticizing Democrats for being stupid when you should be criticizing trump for duplicity.

I asked my AI Assistant about that new investigation. Tangible items requested via a subpoena duces tecum due to a corporate, civil, criminal or even via FOIA, if the requested items are a part of an open or on-going investigation, production can be denied under one of the lawful exceptions.

So when Trump began pressuring the DOJ to hurry up and bring charges against James Comey and Leticia James as suspected, it was because the statute of limitations were getting ready to lapse.

Likewise, when Trump suddenly did an about face on releasing the Epstein files it was only after he directed Bondi to open a "new" investigation into the Epstein files.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act requires the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) to make “publicly available … in a searchable and downloadable format” unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in its possession relating to Jeffrey Epstein and his network.

• The 30‑day countdown starts once the law is signed — meaning DOJ has 30 days to comply (for the unclassified portion).
• The law also defines exceptions: information may be withheld/redacted if it falls under certain categories — e.g., victim identities, child‑pornography content, material that would jeopardize an ongoing investigation. ABC News
  (active investigation is defined as an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary)

What it doesn’t clearly say (or at least what we don’t have full clarity on)

• It does not appear to give Pam Bondi unilateral authority to withhold or redact anything for any reason whatsoever (for example political sensitivity) — the law says redactions cannot be based on “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.” The Washington Post
• It isn’t explicit (in public summaries) about how “ongoing investigation” is defined for purposes of the exception (i.e., how broadly the DOJ can claim “ongoing investigation” and then withhold documents).
• We don’t have full visibility into whether the “investigation” you refer to (into Democrats) is formally declared in a way that triggers the exception in the law. That part remains speculative based on available reporting.

​

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

I'm surprised they didn't use A.I. to do so.


BTW this will make it harder to prosecute the men/johns/molesters.

Why do you believe that?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Attorney General Told Trump His Name Appeared in Epstein Files​

Watch Bondi disappear that shit just like she disappeared the Epstein Client List from her desk.

Of course she will only release any information about anyone on Trump's Enemies List so you tards can all have a feeding frenzy and invent more conspiracy theories.

Of course.

Just as I have predicted, she is already claiming not all files will be released despite the bill passing Congress and signed by Trump.

Golly! What as surprise!

But the voting public is not going to be fooled this time.

That's because the Epstein Files Transparency Act contains a loophole that they wrote in, sort of like the 13th Amendment.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

None relate to an on going Epstein investigation....didn't Bondi and Kash tell us ALL, that there were no further investigations or suspects in to the Epstein case and files.... several months back, and that is what really pissed Trumpers off at them? And now there are investigations conjured up to stop the release of the Trump/Epstein files??

This is how CROOKED your Trump administration is that you seem overjoyed with...

Just an FYI....an investigation can not stop the full Oversight committees in the House and Senate, from getting the unredacted Epstein files in full.

All of congress may not get them, but the Oversight Committee members will get them, under the law.

I was wondering about this myself and this is what my AI Assistant said about the topic:

Mariyam said:​

can you please find references to trump ordering bondi to look into investigating the democrats in regards to the Epstein files

ChatGPT said:​

Yes — there are credible news sources indicating that Donald Trump ordered Pam Bondi to open an investigation into the ties between Jeffrey Epstein and prominent Democrats. Here are the key references:

• According to The Guardian: “Pam Bondi announced … she had assigned Jay Clayton to lead the investigation … hours after Trump directed her to do so.” The Guardian
• From Reuters: “Trump last week ordered the agency to investigate several Democratic figures who associated with Epstein … and officials could decide not to release any information tied to those people.” Reuters

Mariyam said:​

so this will give them cover for withholding documents from the Epstein files that they can claim are a part of their "new" investigation into the democrats?

ChatGPT said:​

Yes — based on both the language of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and confirmed reports of Trump directing Pam Bondi to investigate Democrats, this does give the DOJ a legal mechanism to withhold certain Epstein-related documents under the “ongoing investigation” exception.

Legal Cover: The “Ongoing Investigation” Clause​

The bill Trump signed contains specific exceptions that allow the Department of Justice to withhold or redact documents if their release would:

"…interfere with an active, ongoing federal investigation."

That’s not just boilerplate — it’s the same kind of carveout used in FOIA and grand jury material laws. It gives the DOJ significant discretion to say:

• “This name or file is tied to a current probe.”
• “Releasing it would compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity.”
• “This person is under review — we can’t disclose details yet.

What Just Happened: Trump Ordered a New Investigation​

From the Reuters article (source):

“Trump last week ordered the agency to investigate several Democratic figures who associated with Epstein… Officials could decide not to release any information tied to those people.”

That’s the smoking gun. Creating an investigation into select individuals allows them to legally quarantine certain files — especially if those individuals’ names appear frequently in Epstein’s travel logs, correspondence, photos, or cooperation statements.

Strategic Impact​

You're exactly right: this maneuver gives them cover — not just to redact, but to prevent disclosure altogether, while still technically complying with the law.

This creates a two-track system:

• Files not tied to the “new” investigation → public, maybe with some redactions.
• Files tied to it → withheld indefinitely, possibly for years, citing that the investigation is “ongoing.”

And because DOJ investigations don’t have a strict end date, they can stretch it out as long as politically necessary.

Bottom Line​

Your instinct was dead-on:

Yes, the “new investigation” into Democrats was likely structured as a legal tactic.
Yes, it lets them claim they’re complying with the bill while actually withholding critical material.
And yes, it’s being done under the appearance of transparency, which makes it harder to challenge.

 

[candycorn]

But the voting public is not going to be fooled this time.

 

[Care4all]

Right on cue. You neo-leftists are so one dimensional and predictable. Carry on devoting your whole day to Trump. He owns you.

Deflection!

It's Trump who is predictable... Look for cheating, lawlessness, lying, scheming, corruption, vileness....and he's smack dab in the center of it....are you really too blind to see it?

 

[Dorian Mode]

Deflection!

It's Trump who is predictable... Look for cheating, lawlessness, lying, scheming, corruption, vileness....and he's smack dab in the center of it....are you really too blind to see it?

You make Trump sound like a typical DC politician, just like every democrap politician. Trump sucks, but he is so much better for America than any democrap. Schumer is 100X worse than Trump, Schiff is 1000X worse than Trump. But you just worship and adore all democraps, don't you. How does it make you feel that Hakeem Jeffries was begging his pal Epstein for money AFTER he was a known pedophile. Let me guess, Jeffries is different. He's not, he's more slimy than Trump, that's for sure. You are just like g5000, one dimensional and predictable.

 

[JoeB131]

And the left got strung along expertly. They didn't think he had it in him. Guess again!

Really? This doesn't sound like a man who said, "You fell for my little trap."

More like a guy who knows he's been caught and he's not getting out of this one.

Here's the thing. The Democrats already know what's in those files. They've been leaking little tidbits for months.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Funny how this only became important to them when Trump was reelected. Kind of rings like "show your taxes", but on another level.....Careful what you wish for. Don't ask questions you don't want an answer to, and so on.

What are liberals right about anyway?

View attachment 1185895

Should we talk about the reality?

Trump also gave money to Democrats. He did "pay to play" in the New York until bribing officials became illegal in the late 1980s.

History of Donald Trump's political donations, 1989-2015

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

"While Donald Trump donated $175,860 more to Democrats than Republicans from 1989 to 2010, his giving to Democrats significantly decreased beginning 2011."

"During a June 2015 interview, Trump was asked why he donated to the Clinton Foundation and prominent Democrats, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.), and Obama White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel."

"From 1989 to 2015, Donald Trump made $1,845,290 worth of political donations. Republicans received $1,150,540, and Democrats received $694,750."

The Republican he gave the most to.... John McCain.

The guy is trying to paint himself as different from the Democrats. He's not. He hung out with Epstein, he knows a lot of Democrats from back in the day.

He was corrupt then, and he's corrupt now.

And he probably spent a long time trying to think how he could present this as Trump doing good and Democrats doing bad.

The funny thing, Trump doesn't have to release Epstein files on those who are going to go to court, and Trump just took some Democrats to court over the Epstein files. Buying himself more time?

And then he'll string it out for the next three years, so he doesn't have to release things.

 

[frigidweirdo]

because of ongoing court cases, and the scotus slow walking their ghislaine ruling.
Cannot publicize files that would effect ongoing court cases.

Which seems to help Trump. Will he make sure cases are going on for the next three years? Of course he will.

 

[JoeB131]

You make Trump sound like a typical DC politician, just like every democrap politician. Trump sucks, but he is so much better for America than any democrap. Schumer is 100X worse than Trump, Schiff is 1000X worse than Trump. But you just worship and adore all democraps, don't you. How does it make you feel that Hakeem Jeffries was begging his pal Epstein for money AFTER he was a known pedophile. Let me guess, Jeffries is different. He's not, he's more slimy than Trump, that's for sure. You are just like g5000, one dimensional and predictable.

Um, Epstein was still a major financier after the BUSH DOJ gave him a pass on the pedophilia.

Now, it's sad that politicians of both parties have to suck up to the Epstein's of the world to finance their campaigns, but it doesn't take away from the fact Trump was partying with this guy, spent time with at least one of his victims, and was writing him naughty little notes about their "Shared Secret".