Well, that didn't take long. The pushback has begun.

[YoursTruly]

They tried to bankrupt Trump and put him in prison on frivolous charges and they indicted everyone close to him on frivolous charges. The jury is still out on the attempted assassinations but it's possible he was set up to be killed. Now the left whines about "pushbacks". No surprise here.

BS. Total and utter BS.. All that bond money he was supposed to come up with, they let him slide on most of it.
If they wanted him in prison, they could've done it before, during or after the primaries. But they let him slide on that too.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Schiff and Schumer said it.

Preemptive pardons are an abuse of power and a dangerous precedent and innocent people do not need a preemptive pardon.

Amazing. You know what? I BELIEVE THEM.

ARE YOU LEFTIES CALLING SCHIFF AND SCHUMER LIARS?!

 

[The Duke]

Trump knows his repeal of birthright citizenship won't stand.

He did it as theater for the racist rubes.

The president has full power over things like that.

 

[The Duke]

BS. Total and utter BS.. All that bond money he was supposed to come up with, they let him slide on most of it.
If they wanted him in prison, they could've done it before, during or after the primaries. But they let him slide on that too.

They wanted to live, too.

 

[berg80]

The president has full power over things like that.

18 States Sue to Stop Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order​

Attorneys general from 18 states sued President Trump on Tuesday to block an executive order that refuses to recognize the U.S.-born children of unauthorized immigrants as citizens, the opening salvo in what promises to be a long legal battle over the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

The complaint, filed in Federal District Court in Massachusetts was joined by the cities of San Francisco and Washington, D.C.

The states view Mr. Trump’s attempt to limit birthright citizenship as “extraordinary and extreme,” said New Jersey’s attorney general, Matthew J. Platkin, who led the legal effort along with the attorneys general from California and Massachusetts. “Presidents are powerful, but he is not a king. He cannot rewrite the Constitution with a stroke of the pen.”

18 States Sue to Stop Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order

The lawsuit to block the president’s executive order is the first salvo in what is likely to be a long-running legal fight over immigration policy.

www.nytimes.com

But he thinks he's a king.

 

[berg80]

BS. Total and utter BS.. All that bond money he was supposed to come up with, they let him slide on most of it.
If they wanted him in prison, they could've done it before, during or after the primaries. But they let him slide on that too.

Not to mention the 10 times he violated Merchan's gag order.

 

[berg80]

The president has full power over things like that.

The order flew in the face of more than 100 years of legal precedent, when the courts and the executive branch interpreted the 14th Amendment as guaranteeing citizenship to every baby born in the United States, regardless of their parents’ legal status. The courts recognized only a narrow exception for the children of accredited diplomats.

But there are signs the judiciary could be divided on the issue. Judge James C. Ho, whom Mr. Trump nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, has been more sympathetic to some of Mr. Trump’s arguments, likening unauthorized immigrants to an invading army. That comparison has also been made by lawyers for the State of Texas and another declaration by Mr. Trump that illegal crossings at the southern border amount to an “ongoing invasion.”

Still, that appeals court does not hear cases originating in Massachusetts, and other courts are unlikely to even consider the Trump administration’s arguments about constitutional interpretation without a new law from Congress, said Gerard Magliocca, a professor at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law. He cited recent cases where the Supreme Court ruled that the executive branch can’t single-handedly address the biggest political controversies, known as “major questions.”

 

[Nostra]

Trump knows his repeal of birthright citizenship won't stand.

He did it as theater for the racist rubes.

What race are anchor babies, Simp?

 

[Nostra]

Trump knows his repeal of birthright citizenship won't stand.

He did it as theater for the racist rubes.

Why won’t it stand?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Why do Sanctuary states want illegals to be become citizens, while not wanting to accept illegals from states that uphold the law?

The law for Anchor babies was for slaves. Not for someone to sneak across the border and push out a puppy.

Liberals are trying to destroy America intentionally.

 

[imawhosure]

Trump’s executive orders already face pushback, legal challenges​

Two hours after being sworn in, President Donald Trump sat down in the President’s Room at the U.S. Capitol to sign the first of nearly 100 promised executive orders — a historic and hand-cramping effort that he promised would begin “the complete restoration of America and the revolution of common sense.”

But his pen strokes also kicked off a round of objections from opponents, scholars and other groups that said he’d exceeded the limits of his presidential power. They included some critics who filed lawsuits before his signatures were dry, all but guaranteeing that his approval would not be the last word on Monday’s executive actions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/21/trump-executive-orders-challenges-lawsuits/

The biggest concern in pursuing these matters through the courts is of course the degree to which they have been coopted by trumpery.

And let me tell you.....this time around, much to your chagrin............it will not take us long to BURY your a*es, politically speaking. You are going to learn a lesson quickly; that if you fu* with the bull, you get the pointy political horns stuck up your political a**, and it will feel more like you are in a prison, then a gentle, medical, enema!

Good luck to you, DERbergHOF-)

 

[Orangecat]

Trump is facilitating a SCOTUS clarification on the scope of 14th Amendment. Smart move, considering the current justices.

 

[BackAgain]

Trump’s executive orders already face pushback, legal challenges​

Two hours after being sworn in, President Donald Trump sat down in the President’s Room at the U.S. Capitol to sign the first of nearly 100 promised executive orders — a historic and hand-cramping effort that he promised would begin “the complete restoration of America and the revolution of common sense.”

But his pen strokes also kicked off a round of objections from opponents, scholars and other groups that said he’d exceeded the limits of his presidential power. They included some critics who filed lawsuits before his signatures were dry, all but guaranteeing that his approval would not be the last word on Monday’s executive actions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/21/trump-executive-orders-challenges-lawsuits/

The biggest concern in pursuing these matters through the courts is of course the degree to which they have been coopted by trumpery.

Fully expected. And not worth worrying about.

 

[g5000]

The president has full power over things like that.

Wrong. He cannot override the US Constitution the way he overrides your mind.

 

[Nostra]

Wrong. He cannot override the US Constitution the way he overrides your mind.

Why can’t he?

 

[fncceo]

we all know what's important in governing the country is owning the libs

Nah … it’s just gravy.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The biggest concern in pursuing these matters through the courts is of course the degree to which they have been coopted by trumpery.

True.

But the glacial pace of the judicial process that benefited Trump when he was a criminal defendant will hobble him as ‘president.’

The legal challenges will drag on for years, when Democrats control one or both Houses of Congress, when Trump is gone in four years.

 

[scruffy]

To note, those starting these actions also did this same thing concerning Biden.

Immigrants’ Rights Groups Sue Biden Administration Over New Anti-Asylum Rule | American Civil Liberties Union

Push back all you want.

Good luck.

 

[The Duke]

Push back all you want.

Good luck.

Gonna get steamrolled.

 

[OKTexas]

In a complaint obtained by The Washington Post ahead of its filing, the public interest law firm National Security Counselors says that the DOGE panel is breaking a 50-year-old law, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that requires advisory committees to the executive branch to follow specific rules on disclosure, hiring and other practices.
“DOGE is not exempted from FACA’s requirements,” states the lawsuit, written by Kel McClanahan, executive director of National Security Counselors. “All meetings of DOGE, including those conducted through an electronic medium, must be open to the public.”

I have some questions.

1. Has the list of individuals that will make up DOGE been formalized?

2. Have they had a meeting in the last 36 hours?

3. Who is funding the commie law firm?

4. And last but not least, where does this commie law firm get standing to sue?

.