Other scientists reach opposite conclusions because they use the high variability solar output dataset that NASA uses and exclude urban temperature stations which are skewed by the urban heat island effect.Science says that we are experiencing an almost unprecedented warming, that the primary cause is human GHG emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels and that we are at the very brink of being able to do anything significant about it. Rejecting THAT is defying science.
Your scientists use the low variability solar output dataset and include the urban heat island datasets. Plus your guys routinely adjust their model to tune out natural variation. They call it removing drift.
I have so much to teach you.