We Seem to Have a Huge Case of Right Wing Amnesia here at USMB

[RetiredGySgt]

That's the only comeback you seem to have - to call me stupid, which of course, makes YOU look stupid. Why bother to call me names if you have nothing else? Oh yeah, because you're just that fucking dumb.

When you can't attack my posts, you attack me. Not one word on how Biden has only been President since January, and his first budget took effect October 1st.

So all the claims that for 4 years Trump was not responsible but Obama was by your side are false right?

 

[JoeB131]

Hillary claimed it in the 90's and it was a big deal. Reagan didnt make us a debtor nation, we have been debtor nation since our inception. Coolidge was the last President to erase the debt and had us out of debt. Since then, every President has increased the countries debt. Also, the budget Reagan signed were all passed by Congress and the House was run by Democrats.

Thanks for showing us how you continue to blame the other guys, you proved my point.

Wow. really?

Up until Reagan, the previous 39 president racked up less than 1 Trillion in debt. that's fighting two world wars and dozens of smaller ones, a space program, a Great Society, etc.

Why? because we had some funny idea that if you run up expenses, you pay for them.

Reagan is the one who abandoned that sensible policy.

Now, of course, there are other factors. From WWI to 1976, the US ran trade surpluses, and that contributed to the fact we could run up debt and bring in enough revenue to mostly cover them. But Reagan is the one who started the irresponsibility of not paying our debts on the theory you can cut taxes and raise revenue.

 

[Billiejeens]

That's the only comeback you seem to have - to call me stupid, which of course, makes YOU look stupid. Why bother to call me names if you have nothing else? Oh yeah, because you're just that fucking dumb.

When you can't attack my posts, you attack me. Not one word on how Biden has only been President since January, and his first budget took effect October 1st.

Because that is a STUPID FUCKING point.

He started deconstructing the country on Day 1 - with measurable results.

 

[Papageorgio]

Wow. really?

Up until Reagan, the previous 39 president racked up less than 1 Trillion in debt. that's fighting two world wars and dozens of smaller ones, a space program, a Great Society, etc.

Why? because we had some funny idea that if you run up expenses, you pay for them.

Reagan is the one who abandoned that sensible policy.

Now, of course, there are other factors. From WWI to 1976, the US ran trade surpluses, and that contributed to the fact we could run up debt and bring in enough revenue to mostly cover them. But Reagan is the one who started the irresponsibility of not paying our debts on the theory you can cut taxes and raise revenue.

Stalker Joe chimes in again, are you claiming Congress had nothing to do with it? Wow, Reagan was all powerful and Democrats were just poor victims, that is so sad. Over 35 he has been out the poor weak Democrats just can’t do a damn thing. Dems seem real useless to me.

As with all that I’ve seen over the decades, Congress and President don’t act alone, they work together both parties, no one holds all the power, so to blame both sides is a correct view.

The best way to control spending is a Democratic President and a Republican Congress, that Has been proven over and over, the 90’s had Clinton and Gingrich and they did well with the budget.

 

[Papageorgio]

So all the claims that for 4 years Trump was not responsible but Obama was by your side are false right?

Don’t look for her to answer, she runs from reality.

 

[healthmyths]

We had 10 years of consecutive job rowth and 95 percent of the jobs for 10 years were no part time. On top of that Obama handled 2 pandemics and the ecnomy did not stop. Most of what you say is untrue. We were energy independent during Obama and had one of the biggest oil booms of all time. So spare me the lies.

HEY WHERE are YOUR LINKS? You with no proof just your personal, subjective and definitely uninformed OPINION are the biggest example of LIARS! Where is your proof contrary to this Harvard/Princeton study? You calling them liars also?
The research by economists Lawrence Katz of Harvard University and Alan Krueger at Princeton University shows that the proportion of workers throughout the U.S., during the Obama era, who were working in these kinds of temporary jobs, increased from 10.7% of the population to 15.8%.
The disappearance of conventional full-time work, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. work, has hit every demographic. “Workers seeking full-time, steady work have lost,” said Krueger.
Under Obama, 1 million fewer workers, overall, are working than before the beginning of the Great Recession.

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract By Investing.com

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

www.investing.com

Find the FACTS before you call me a LIAR as I'm calling YOU a liar because YOU offer no proof!

 

[IM2]

The trump Nazis live in the same alternate reality today as they did when they were the simple-minded right-wing nuts before the arrival of their orange-tinted messiah. So the "history" they remember is the wild propaganda they hear repeatedly from FOX Noise and the others...

Facts and truth are foreign to the trump Nazis, and since 2015, have been pushed further and further from their fantasy world by the unending lies of their orange cult leader.

With the help of trumpublicans in red state legislatures and governors' mansions, coupled with the cooperation of Joe Manchin and the "moderate" congressional Democrats, the United States' democracy will soon fall to the trumpublicans' single party fascism.

And, while the 74 million trump Nazis are eager to see this transition, they fail to understand the true reality of what is to come. An example: those millions of trump Nazis' over sixty-five whose only income is provided by Social Security, they have failed to understand the federal "entitlement program" that keeps them fed and housed has long been on the GOP's list to be discontinued.

That burning hatred these millions-of-old-trump-Nazi-farts have for progressives will be all they have left, because there will no longer be anyone in Congress to fight to keep Social Security alive. The same goes for another trumpublican target... Medicare.

Enjoy being homeless elderly trump Nazis, it's the life you've chosen. And they won't be the only trump Nazis that have screwed themselves.



.

They would rather destroy the country than live in it as it gets browner. Then once their destruction is complete, they will claim it's because whites aren't in charge anymore. This is the delusion they live in.

 

[IM2]

HEY WHERE are YOUR LINKS? You with no proof just your personal, subjective and definitely uninformed OPINION are the biggest example of LIARS! Where is your proof contrary to this Harvard/Princeton study? You calling them liars also?
The research by economists Lawrence Katz of Harvard University and Alan Krueger at Princeton University shows that the proportion of workers throughout the U.S., during the Obama era, who were working in these kinds of temporary jobs, increased from 10.7% of the population to 15.8%.
The disappearance of conventional full-time work, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. work, has hit every demographic. “Workers seeking full-time, steady work have lost,” said Krueger.
Under Obama, 1 million fewer workers, overall, are working than before the beginning of the Great Recession.

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract By Investing.com

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

www.investing.com

Find the FACTS before you call me a LIAR as I'm calling YOU a liar because YOU offer no proof!

I have presented this information numerous times so I am nit going to show a link because YOU don't want to believe something. What you call me doesn't change the truth of what really happened.

 

[IM2]

Because that is a STUPID FUCKING point.

He started deconstructing the country on Day 1 - with measurable results.

You are wrong.

 

[bripat9643]

They would rather destroy the country than live in it as it gets browner. Then once their destruction is complete, they will claim it's because whites aren't in charge anymore. This is the delusion they live in.

Dims are the ones who are destroying the country, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

You are wrong.

Nope.

 

[Billiejeens]

They would rather destroy the country than live in it as it gets browner. Then once their destruction is complete, they will claim it's because whites aren't in charge anymore. This is the delusion they live in.

Whites will never not be in charge, boy.

 

[IM2]

Whites will never not be in charge, boy.

Your time is short saltine.

 

[IM2]

Dims are the ones who are destroying the country, moron.

Wrong again.

 

[Billiejeens]

Your time is short saltine.

No, that's your pee pee, dude.

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong again.

NOT.

 

[IM2]

No, that's your pee pee, dude.

Why are you interested in my penis? I like women, so I hope you're a lady.

Your time is short.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

I stopped reading at your first paragraph (below), because it's inaccurate, misleading and a lie. Geezus OP, your thread title reads how we forget and you lead off your thread with falsity, you must be a leftist.

No president miraculously turns around a bad situation in less than a month, and no president makes things great in 2-3 months. First off, the new president is dealing with the buget from the president before him. It took Obama 2-3 years to start seeing improvements. The Obama created economy was handed to trump and people who didn't want to give Obama credit for various reasons were quick to give trump credit for a miraculous turnaround he had nothing to do with.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Hey OP, check this out. Data says you're full of shit, same with a little knowledge.

YR	POTUS	SEN	Con	UN-EMP Rate	POVTY Rate	Crime Rate	GDP	Ave. Misery Rate	Ave. MORT Rate	Inflation Rate	Fed. Debt
1975	Ford	Dem	Dem	8.48	12.3	5.30%	-0.21%	15.10%	9.05%	9.14%	533.2 B
1976	Ford	Dem	Dem	7.70	11.8	5.29%	5.39%	12.70%	8.87%	5.74%	620.4 B
1977	Carter	Dem	Dem	7.05	11.6	5.08%	4.62%	13.10%	8.85%	6.50%	699.8 B
1978	Carter	Dem	Dem	6.07	11.4	5.14%	5.54%	15.00%	9.64%	7.63%	771.5 B
1979	Carter	Dem	Dem	5.85	11.7	5.57%	3.17%	19.30%	11.20%	11.25%	826.5 B
1980	Carter	Dem	Dem	7.18	13	5.95%	-0.26%	19.70%	13.74%	13.55%	907.7 B
1981	Reagan	Rep	Dem	7.62	14	5.86%	2.54%	12.19%	16.63%	10.33%	997.9 B
1982	Reagan	Rep	Dem	9.71	15	5.60%	-1.80%	12.19%	16.04%	6.13%	1.14 T
1983	Reagan	Rep	Dem	9.60	15.2	5.18%	4.58%	12.19%	13.24%	3.21%	1.38 T
1984	Reagan	Rep	Dem	7.51	14.4	5.03%	7.24%	12.19%	13.88%	4.30%	1.57 T
1985	Reagan	Rep	Dem	7.19	14	5.21%	4.17%	12.19%	12.43%	3.55%	1.82 T
1986	Reagan	Rep	Dem	7.00	13.6	5.50%	3.46%	12.19%	10.19%	1.90%	2.13 T
1987	Reagan	Dem	Dem	6.18	13.4	5.58%	3.46%	12.19%	10.21%	3.66%	2.35 T
1988	Reagan	Dem	Dem	5.49	13	5.66%	4.18%	12.19%	10.34%	4.08%	2.60 T
1989	Bush	Dem	Dem	5.26	12.8	5.74%	3.68%	10.68%	10.32%	4.83%	2.86 T
1990	Bush	Dem	Dem	5.62	13.5	5.82%	-1.79%	10.68%	10.13%	5.40%	3.23 T
1991	Bush	Dem	Dem	6.85	14.2	5.90%	-1.99%	10.68%	9.25%	4.24%	3.67 T
1992	Bush	Dem	Dem	7.49	14.8	5.66%	3.52%	10.68%	8.39%	3.03%	4.06 T
1993	Clinton	Dem	Dem	6.91	15.1	5.48%	2.75%	9.20%	7.31%	2.95%	4.41 T
1994	Clinton	Dem	Dem	6.10	14.5	5.37%	4.03%	8.20%	8.38%	2.61%	4.70 T
1995	Clinton	Rep	Rep	5.59	13.8	5.28%	2.68%	8.10%	7.93%	2.81%	4.98 T
1996	Clinton	Rep	Rep	5.41	13.7	5.09%	3.77%	8.70%	7.81%	2.93%	5.22 T
1997	Clinton	Rep	Rep	4.94	13.3	4.93%	4.45%	6.40%	7.60%	2.34%	5.41 T
1998	Clinton	Rep	Rep	4.50	12.7	4.62%	4.48%	6.00%	6.94%	1.55%	5.53 T
1999	Clinton	Rep	Rep	4.22	11.9	4.27%	4.75%	6.70%	7.44%	2.19%	5.66 T
2000	Clinton	Rep	Rep	3.97	11.3	4.12%	-0.63%	7.30%	8.05%	3.38%	5.67 T
2001	Bush	Dem	Rep	4.74	11.7	4.16%	-3.13%	7.30%	6.97%	2.83%	5.80 T
2002	Bush	Dem	Rep	5.78	12.1	4.13%	1.74%	8.40%	6.54%	1.59%	6.23 T
2003	Bush	Rep	Rep	5.99	12.5	4.07%	2.86%	7.60%	5.83%	2.27%	6.78 T
2004	Bush	Rep	Rep	5.54	12.7	3.98%	3.80%	8.70%	5.84%	2.68%	7.38 T
2005	Bush	Rep	Rep	5.08	12.6	3.90%	3.51%	8.30%	5.87%	3.39%	7.93 T
2006	Bush	Rep	Rep	4.61	12.3	3.81%	2.86%	6.90%	6.41%	3.23%	8.50 T
2007	Bush	Dem	Dem	4.62	12.5	3.73%	1.88%	9.10%	6.34%	2.85%	9.07 T
2008	Bush	Dem	Dem	5.80	13.2	3.67%	-0.14%	7.40%	6.03%	3.84%	10.02 T
2009	Obama	Dem	Dem	9.28	14.3	3.51%	-2.54%	12.60%	5.04%	-0.36%	11.90 T
2010	Obama	Dem	Dem	9.61	15.1	3.35%	2.56%	10.80%	4.69%	1.64%	13.56 T
2011	Obama	Dem	Rep	8.93	15	3.29%	1.55%	11.50%	4.45%	3.16%	14.79 T
2012	Obama	Dem	Rep	8.08	15	3.26%	2.25%	9.60%	3.66%	2.07%	16.06 T
2013	Obama	Dem	Rep	7.36	14.8	3.11%	1.84%	8.20%	3.98%	1.46%	16.74 T
2014	Obama	Dem	Rep	6.16	14.8	2.95%	2.53%	6.40%	4.17%	1.62%	17.82 T
2015	Obama	Rep	Rep	5.28	13.5	2.89%	2.91%	5.70%	3.85%	0.12%	18.15 T
2016	Obama	Rep	Rep	4.88	12.7	2.85%	1.64%	6.80%	3.65%	1.26%	19.57 T
2017	Trump	Rep	Rep	4.35	12.3	2.76%	2.37%	6.30%	3.99%	2.13%	20.24 T
2018	Trump	Rep	Rep	3.89	11.8	2.59%	2.93%	5.80%	4.54%	2.44%	21.52 T
2019	Trump	Rep	Dem	3.68	10.5	2.49%	2.16%	5.80%	3.94%	1.81%	22.71 T
June 2020	Trump	Rep	Dem		9.3		Pending	6.6	3.16%	1.25%
2020	Trump	Rep	Dem	6.70	11.7		-3.30%	6.6	3.11%	1.25%	26.95 T
2021	Xiden	Dem	Dem	5.90	Projected 13.7		1st Qtr. 6.5%	10.77	3.13%	5.3%	28.8 T

 

[healthmyths]

I have presented this information numerous times so I am nit going to show a link because YOU don't want to believe something. What you call me doesn't change the truth of what really happened.

You know it is so easy to present the FACTS and I've presented FACTS. YOU zero! So who should be believed?

6 Big Companies Claiming Job Losses from Obamacare - AvvoStories

When Obama’s healthcare reform law passed, many rejoiced because they would finally have access to affordable health insurance. In addition, Speaker Nancy

stories.avvo.com

6 Big Companies Claiming Job Losses from Obamacare​

Sallie Mae—When Obama signed the healthcare reform back in March, Sallie Mae, the nation’s largest student lender, announced they would have to cut 2,500 jobs.
Meditronics Bill Hawkins, chief executive of the company, said his company will likely cut at least 1,000 jobs to absorb the new tax.
Caterpillar—After laying off 19,000 workers and losing hundreds of millions in revenue, it didn’t appear things could get any worse for construction equipment manufacturer Caterpillar. All seemed to look a bit more optimistic when Obama specifically promised that his economic plan would help Caterpillar rehire many of its laid off employees. But now due to healthcare reform, Caterpillar predicted a new cost of $100 million,
The company said it will face an additional $150 million in increased costs for the year in order to comply with the new laws. This eliminates about 11 percent of the company’s profits for 2010.
Insurance company Prudential Financial said it has taken a $100 million chargebecause of Obamacare. A few months later, Prudential was laying off employees at certain offices, and there was talk of some of their jobs being outsourced. For now, the job cuts aren’t huge numbers (about 60 positions have been eliminated), but there is talk that more jobs may be outsourced in the future.
AT&T—Telecommunications giant AT&T announced it will take a $1 billion loss in the first quarter of 2010 because of healthcare changes from the Obama administration.

Now how could there be "New" jobs if due to Obamacare it cost these 6 companies over $1,000,000,000?

But hey... facts mean NOTHING to you.

Businesses eliminated hundreds of thousands of full-time jobs to avoid Obamacare mandate​

Up to 250,000 positions may have been eliminated by small businesses seeking to avoid Obamacare’s employer mandate, according to estimates in a new working paper distributed by the National Bureau of Economic Research. Altogether between 28,000 and 50,000 businesses appear to have reduced their number of full-time employees from 2014 to 2016 because of the mandate.

Businesses eliminated hundreds of thousands of full-time jobs to avoid Obamacare mandate

The Affordable Care Act requires businesses with more than 50 full-time employees to provide health insurance.

www.marketwatch.com

BUT again I provided FACTS... where are YOUR facts???