We Really Need To Expand 2nd Amendment Rights

[sealybobo]

Link?

Just saw it on facebook. This is his MO. Google Charlie asking kids "what is a woman?" or "what is your definition of a man/woman?" You weren't a Charlie fan? Maybe you should look into his tactics and negativity. He was a dick. Too soon?

 

[sealybobo]

You are DEAD WRONG about that.
ALL of you Hyper-Partisan Cultist ARE THE PROBLEM.

All you and Charlie do is lie and troll. Well, all you do. All he did.

 

[M14 Shooter]

His record on your Constitutional Rights is not Stellar regarding the 2nd Amendment.

His record, rather than his rhetoric, consists of one thing -- the ATF rule change which effectively banned bump-stocks.
That went so well in the courts, I'm willing to believe he set the anti-gun loons up to fail - Cargill was an absolute win for us.

 

[sealybobo]

You are DEAD WRONG about that.
ALL of you Hyper-Partisan Cultist (on either side) ARE THE PROBLEM.

What did Charlie say that was not lying and trolling? How come we don't have a Charlie thread where we can discuss what he said. Show us videos. Let his memory be eternal. Let's debate what he said. I watched a video on facebook. My opinion? What a dick!

 

[M14 Shooter]

You are DEAD WRONG about that.
ALL of you Hyper-Partisan Cultist (on either side) ARE THE PROBLEM.

She's dead wrong about everything.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

His record, rather than his rhetoric, consists of one thing -- the ATF rule change which effectively banned bump-stocks.
That went so well for us in the court, I'm willing to believe he set the anti-gun loons up to fail - Cargill was an absolute win for us.

You missed my point...and what I actually said.

He HAS done "some" good things.....and he has done some not so good things.

You seem to mistake what he SAYS he is going to do....for what he actually does.
ALL POLITICIANS will promise you the world on a Silver platter, but somehow neither the platter nor the world ever appear once elected.

 

[sealybobo]

She's dead wrong about everything.

You are. For example, I'm a dude. See? Right off the bat you are wrong.

In Charlie's own words "what's your definition of a woman?"

 

[sealybobo]

You missed my point...and what I actually said.

He HAS done "some" good things.....and he has done some not so good things.

You seem to mistake what he SAYS he is going to do....for what he actually does.
ALL POLITICIANS will promise you the world on a Silver platter, but somehow neither the platter nor the world ever appear once elected.

All anyone with a brain has to do is look at what Trump has done to the economy compared to what he said he would do. He said he would lower prices and bring jobs home. The jobs numbers are horrible and his tariffs have cost us a fortune. Ask the farmers.

So jobs, bad

Cost of living, bad

Stock market? Great!

Trump's personal wealth? Skyrocketting!!!

Wake up fools!

 

[sealybobo]

Don't give me that "just give it 2 years" bs. Trump said day 1. Was he lying? YES???

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

What did Charlie say that was not lying and trolling? How come we don't have a Charlie thread where we can discuss what he said. Show us videos. Let his memory be eternal. Let's debate what he said. I watched a video on facebook. My opinion? What a dick!

You watched "A" video ?
I've watched half a dozen of his videos. He is a great debater. He uses established tactics to disarm opponents.
But what I do not see is the lies you mention. His statements all seem to be based in fact.

Let me turn that around.....
What did Charlie Kirk sat that WAS lying or trolling. Be specific.

 

[sealybobo]

See?
All you do is troll and lie.

Trump said he would lower prices on day one. Was he lying or just wrong? He had to be lying. Unless he didn't know tariffs would get passed on to us?

 

[sealybobo]

You watched "A" video ?
I've watched half a dozen of his videos. He is a great debater. He uses established tactics to disarm opponents.
But what I do not see is the lies you mention. His statements all seem to be based in fact.

Let me turn that around.....
What did Charlie Kirk sat that WAS lying or trolling. Be specific.

Show us the video. I want to see what the question was, how he answered, then you and I will debate it. You give me a link.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You seem to mistake what he SAYS he is going to do....for what he actually does.

The point I made was that what he has done is different than what he says, so...

 

[M14 Shooter]

What did Charlie Kirk sat that WAS lying or trolling. Be specific.

All she does is lie and troll..

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Show us the video. I want to see what the question was, how he answered, then you and I will debate it. You give me a link.

It appears that M14Shooter was correct about your evasiveness.
You make claims then have nothing to back them.

So basically it's you who is the deceiver. And this is precisely why the world is turning against your kind.

 

[westwall]

Not to argue for the sake of argument but this off duty cop should have handled this differently. He should have called the police. The fact that he "snapped" as you say, would not play well for him. Had he called police before going over there, the police could have seen the child's injuries and then aid in a citizen's arrest.

Maybe. As we have seen the legal system rarely punishes evil doers until they finally work themselves up to murder.

 

[Chuz Life]

Maybe. As we have seen the legal system rarely punishes evil doers until they finally work themselves up to murder.

You don't have to push me very hard to make me sympathetic towards the alternative justice systems.

 

[westwall]

You don't have to push me very hard to make me sympathetic towards the alternative justice systems.

Nor me. Sometimes vigilance committee's are the only option.

 

[ChristisKing]

Maybe. As we have seen the legal system rarely punishes evil doers until they finally work themselves up to murder.

Then laugh and joke about it and act demonically and nobody does a darn thing about it in real life or on this message board.

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/evil-is-taking-over-usmb.1178520/

 

[Grau]

Not to argue for the sake of argument but this off duty cop should have handled this differently. He should have called the police. The fact that he "snapped" as you say, would not play well for him. Had he called police before going over there, the police could have seen the child's injuries and then aid in a citizen's arrest.

While I appreciate the compassion and courage demonstrated by the off-duty officer, I agree that putting yourself in the position of "snapping" endangers everyone involved.

I've been in the unpleasant position of having to deploy my hidden firearm multiple times.
I allowed one individual to curse me, spit at me, kick my car etc as I had a concealed .45 acp pointed at his chest while remembering that few things justify killing another human being.

Thanks,