They 100% understood the right to keep and bear arms could be misused, as they had any number of examples to look at.
And yet, they still chose to protect it from infringement.
The Second Amendment “is the very product of an interest balancing by the people,” and it “surely elevates above all other interests the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms” for self-defense\
- v Bruen 2022.
Right about now is where you need to lie to make your point.
Doesn't it say something about "A well regulated Militia"?
They couldn't be more clear about it yet to you righties this is vague?