We re in a Constitutional Crisis By Judges

Once SCOTUS says Trump has to listen to lower courts, which is obviously how the constitution works, then they don’t have to make decisions ā€œcase by caseā€.
If the judges are radical Socialist Communists, then that means we have had a coup. A coup that has happened over many decades. A growing percentage of citizens care not of their personal safety.
 
There needs to be a panel that looks at these cases to decide whether or not they are legitimate rulings.
Yes. They're called the court of appeals.

Jesus, did you drop out of middle school or something?
 
Yes. They're called the court of appeals.

Jesus, did you drop out of middle school or something?
Appeals courts take years, so any biased judge can shut down a presidents entire term. That would be a pretty fucking stupid way to handle things, wouldnt you agree?
 
Appeals courts take years, so any biased judge can shut down a presidents entire term. That would be a pretty fucking stupid way to handle things, wouldnt you agree?
You guys were okay with it when you shut down Biden.

But no, appeals don't take years.
 
You guys were okay with it when you shut down Biden.
I didnt follow those cases closely enough to know if they even compare, but regardless, this WILL happen to the next democrat president if it isnt fixed, and these instances have been ramping up dramatically, so you should expect to see all presidents get totally shut down if we dont do something about it.

But no, appeals don't take years.
They take a year on average, sometimes multiple years. We cant have some dipshit shutting down an elected presidents agenda for a year, then reword the challenge and squeeze out another year, and so on. Furthermore, why not just shut down every presidents last year, or first year, second year, or third year?

This is not sustainable. We need to fix this.
 
You guys were okay with it when you shut down Biden.
This didnt start with Biden, and Biden got off easy. Biden wasnt facing the avalanche that Trump has been subjected to.
 
This didnt start with Biden, and Biden got off easy. Biden wasnt facing the avalanche that Trump has been subjected to.
Trump brought it upon himself by pushing every legal boundary possible and daring the courts to stop him. Biden was quite reserved.
 
Two fighter jets just scrambled out of Andrews . Maybe for judicial roundup practice??
 
Trump brought it upon himself by pushing every legal boundary possible and daring the courts to stop him. Biden was quite reserved.
Trump WILL win on appeal, so none of that ^ is true.
 
No, i want to have the ability to challenge a president when he does something i dont like, but what i dont want is a system where any biased judge can just wave a wand and make judgements for the entire nation on a whim. There needs to be a panel that looks at these cases to decide whether or not they are legitimate rulings.

1745939501484.webp
 
The Constitutional Crisis is a President who is above the law who is seizing power reserved for Congress and the Courts.
 
SCOTUS has already had to rule against him several times, so you’re not going to be 100% right.
When it comes to a district judge making nation wide sweeping injunctions, they will absolutely rule on Trumps side, for all of the reasons ive listed in this debate. Our nation isnt sustainable if the SC allows that to be legal.
 
When it comes to a district judge making nation wide sweeping injunctions, they will absolutely rule on Trumps side, for all of the reasons ive listed in this debate. Our nation isnt sustainable if the SC allows that to be legal.
SCOTUS telling them to move the one case to Texas is an indication where their heads are at already, as far as jurisdiction.

The Constitutional Crisis is a President who is above the law who is seizing power reserved for Congress and the Courts.
Get back to us when that happens.
 
When it comes to a district judge making nation wide sweeping injunctions, they will absolutely rule on Trumps side, for all of the reasons ive listed in this debate. Our nation isnt sustainable if the SC allows that to be legal.
It's perfectly sustainable as it's been the situation for decades. It's like when SCOTUS confirmed the district court preventing Trump from using the Alien Enemies Act to deport people.

 
Trump brought it upon himself by pushing every legal boundary possible and daring the courts to stop him. Biden was quite reserved.
Libs always have two lectoral concepts in their spew
One is ā€œbrought it upon yourselfā€. The other is ā€œfor your own goodā€
This is a continuation of their shame based attempts at control. That’s how they grew up and why they are deformed
 
Last edited:
Libs always have two lectoral concepts in their sore
One is ā€œbrought it upon yourselfā€. The other is ā€œfor your own goodā€
This is a continuation of their shame based attempts at control. That’s how they grew up and why they are deformed
Did the judge who was arrested by the FBI "bring it upon herself"?
 
It's perfectly sustainable as it's been the situation for decades. It's like when SCOTUS confirmed the district court preventing Trump from using the Alien Enemies Act to deport people.

Temporary pause while other cases move through the courts.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom