We need to stop pretending that this issue is so difficult. It is obvious even to a young child.

[louie888]

How do you people not get this?

 

[jwoodie]

In what way are the Israelis unwilling to compromise? Conversely, in what way are the Palestinians willing to compromise?

1. They have never agreed to permit the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state. (All the offers have included indefinite continued military occupation)
2. They have refused to follow UN Resolutions (e.g. 191) regarding the right of return of the Palestinians to their homes.
3. They have refused to return to 1967 borders per UN Resolution(s).

What should the Palestinians compromise, the Jews have taken more than 60% of their land already.

Thanks for the answer(s), but you have unwittingly undermined your own thesis:

1. The Israelis are willing to compromise on a Palestinian State, but the Palestinians are unwilling to compromise on Israeli security (or even recognize an Israeli State).

2. The Israelis are willing to compromise by trading land for peace; the Palestinians are not.

3. See #1 and #2 above. The only compromise you are willing to accept is Israel committing national suicide.

 

[Roudy]

The solution has been in front of our face for decades, all based on international law.

The United Nations and Decolonization - Declaration

Too bad the Arabs didn't believe " International Law" applied to them before 1967

Of course "International Law" applied to the Muslims and Christians before 1967 and they knew it. Unfortunately, the UN ignored International Law and helped the Jews from Europe to colonize Palestine.

Now that's some funny shit.

 

[Roudy]

It's a simple cartoon that even young children can understand.

Since young children are incapable of adult reasoning, it follows that this cartoon is designed to appeal to people with immature minds (such as yourself?). In addition, the "crib" analogy exposes a logical gap: Who built the crib?

Is it your assertion that the modern State of Israel has stolen all of its technology, development and infrastructure from the indigenous Palestinians? Or is it just the fact that Israel exists on any piece of land between the Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean?

Are you aware that "Palestine" was a creation of British and French diplomats carving up the Ottoman Empire after WW1? If anyone has a legitimate claim to that land it is the Turks, not the Palestinians.

The fact of the matter is that the Palestinians have been played by their Arab masters in the same way that disaffected minorities in the U.S. are played by their political masters: Keep them focused on imaginary enemies so they don't turn on their masters.

Well, if that wasn't the most amount of bullshit from an ignoramus in one post. The inhabitants of the territory had the only legitimate claim to the land pursuant to Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations.


"ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

The best method of giving practical effect to this principle is that the tutelage of such peoples should be entrusted to advanced nations who by reason of their resources, their experience or their geographical position can best undertake this responsibility, and who are willing to accept it, and that this tutelage should be exercised by them as Mandatories on behalf of the League."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

By the way Palestine was established about 2,000 years ago, by the Romans.

Here we go....same repetitive irrelevant false garbage, different thread. Over and over and over. The guy literally has nothing but this constant barrage of lies and hate.

 

[Roudy]

The solution has been in front of our face for decades, all based on international law.

The United Nations and Decolonization - Declaration

Too bad the Arabs didn't believe " International Law" applied to them before 1967

Of course "International Law" applied to the Muslims and Christians before 1967 and they knew it. Unfortunately, the UN ignored International Law and helped the Jews from Europe to colonize Palestine.

Yawn..,,, Israel has no right to exist. Just more proof they will never accept the " 67 Borders"

Agreed. That's why the Jews of Israel will end up like the white Rhodesians instead of the white South Africans.

How's that defective comparison and faulty strategy working out? In light of the recent bill that has been introduced in the US that makes it illegal to force anybody to boycott Israel or Israelis? You guys are constantly trying to go up shit creek without a paddle.

 

[Shusha]

How do you people not get this?

You haven't answered my questions, Louie. Who gets the crib? Baby #1 or Baby #2?

 

[louie888]

How do you people not get this?

You haven't answered my questions, Louie. Who gets the crib? Baby #1 or Baby #2?

Duh.

 

[Shusha]

Duh.

If its so easy, just say it.

 

[louie888]

If its so easy, just say it.

Go poll a million people. Separate into 2 groups. Non-zionist and zionist. Tell me what you come up with.

 

[Shusha]

If its so easy, just say it.

Go poll a million people. Separate into 2 groups. Non-zionist and zionist. Tell me what you come up with.

I think I will come up with a whole bunch of Arab hypocrites.

 

[Hollie]

How do you people not get this?

You haven't answered my questions, Louie. Who gets the crib? Baby #1 or Baby #2?

Duh.

See, this is the problem you run in to when you're not plagiarizing others' posts. Left on your on, you're just helpless.

 

[louie888]

I think I will come up with a whole bunch of Arab hypocrites.

I'm sure the entire world, but for the zionists will offer you the same answer.

 

[Shusha]

I think I will come up with a whole bunch of Arab hypocrites.

I'm sure the entire world, but for the zionists will offer you the same answer.

Then they are all hypocrites. See, the Arab Palestinians, and their supporters, insist that they are both baby #1 and baby #2, at various times when it suits them to.

 

[louie888]

I think I will come up with a whole bunch of Arab hypocrites.

I'm sure the entire world, but for the zionists will offer you the same answer.

Then they are all hypocrites. See, the Arab Palestinians, and their supporters, insist that they are both baby #1 and baby #2, at various times when it suits them to.

Lie about whatever you like. I am simply showing you how the rest of the world sees it.

 

[Shusha]

Lie about whatever you like. I am simply showing you how the rest of the world sees it.

You won't even answer the question. Its a simple question. Because you know it will reveal yourself to be the hypocrite that you are, and also show that the rest of the world buys into ridiculous Palestinian hypocrisy.

 

[P F Tinmore]

In what way are the Israelis unwilling to compromise? Conversely, in what way are the Palestinians willing to compromise?

1. They have never agreed to permit the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state. (All the offers have included indefinite continued military occupation)
2. They have refused to follow UN Resolutions (e.g. 191) regarding the right of return of the Palestinians to their homes.
3. They have refused to return to 1967 borders per UN Resolution(s).

What should the Palestinians compromise, the Jews have taken more than 60% of their land already.

Thanks for the answer(s), but you have unwittingly undermined your own thesis:

1. The Israelis are willing to compromise on a Palestinian State, but the Palestinians are unwilling to compromise on Israeli security (or even recognize an Israeli State).

2. The Israelis are willing to compromise by trading land for peace; the Palestinians are not.

3. See #1 and #2 above. The only compromise you are willing to accept is Israel committing national suicide.

2. The Israelis are willing to compromise by trading land for peace; the Palestinians are not.

Israel has no land.

Who wrote this crap?

 

[louie888]

The above illustrates clearly how easy it is to understand what is happening in Palestine. It is the bottom line of the israeli narrative. What else is there to say, right?

 

[Eloy]

View attachment 140006

How do you people not get this?

This sets up an unavoidable problem for the anti-Israel team.

Either indigenous and prior peoples have rights or they do not. If they DO, then the Jewish people also have those rights. If they do NOT, then the Palestinians have no rights as a prior people.

You can't have it both ways. Either the people who were there prior to an invasion have the right to restoration or they do not. This cartoon seems to argue that they do not. If child #2 is bumped for child #3, child #3 now holds the rights, yes? That is the implication of the cartoon. Is that what you want to go with?

The indigenous Palestinians are a people who are being denied their land, freedom, and self determination by the Israelis here and now. This is a contemporary problem unlike treatment of the Jews by the Romans millennia ago.

 

[Kondor3]

We need to stop pretending that this issue is so difficult. It is obvious even to a young child.

True.

As soon as the Muslim-Palestinian squatters move to the East Bank of the Jordan, this all goes away.

 

[Hollie]

In what way are the Israelis unwilling to compromise? Conversely, in what way are the Palestinians willing to compromise?

1. They have never agreed to permit the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state. (All the offers have included indefinite continued military occupation)
2. They have refused to follow UN Resolutions (e.g. 191) regarding the right of return of the Palestinians to their homes.
3. They have refused to return to 1967 borders per UN Resolution(s).

What should the Palestinians compromise, the Jews have taken more than 60% of their land already.

Thanks for the answer(s), but you have unwittingly undermined your own thesis:

1. The Israelis are willing to compromise on a Palestinian State, but the Palestinians are unwilling to compromise on Israeli security (or even recognize an Israeli State).

2. The Israelis are willing to compromise by trading land for peace; the Palestinians are not.

3. See #1 and #2 above. The only compromise you are willing to accept is Israel committing national suicide.

2. The Israelis are willing to compromise by trading land for peace; the Palestinians are not.

Israel has no land.

Who wrote this crap?

Israel has no land? You mean except for their land.

Do the mullahs at your madrassah write the nonsense you dump into threads?