What I don't understand is why you don't understand that what you call sexual immorality was just as societally sanctioned then. Same as it ever was. It was only condemned by a group of religiously addled sexually repressed sanctimonious hypocritical perverts. Aside from that you base your entire belief system about human sexuality morality and what is right or wrong behavior on the most ignorant literal perverse interpretation of scripture possible as if the concerns of God who is Spirit were diet fashion and the sexual preferences of human beings.For the fifth time, I am not talking about personal behavior of the 1940s; I’m talking about societal sanction of sexual immorality which exists now that did not exist then. I can’t imagine why that is so hard to understand.
That would be comparable to you being offended by the reproductive habits of squirrels. But even worse.
The point being your judgments are based on ignorance about the meaning of the words and subjects about which you are so dogmatic. You are lost in a delusion about the good old days which really weren't so great if human sexuality was societally sanctioned as something to be ashamed of. Now that's perverse and obscene.
Last edited: