Zone1 We need to Return to 1940's Values on Sex Outside Marriage. Desperately.

Like I say, societal sexual morality was such that they couldn’t just come out with it. Better times for sure in that regard.
Being unable to openly depict a natural part of being human was better? Then go hide your head in the sand.

People aren't going to change because you have sexually dysfunctional insecurities and hangups. Get over it.
 
No they aren't. Billions in settlements to cover it up. Keep a table between you and them.
All from 50 years ago when gays were able to infiltrate the priesthood. Since 2005, gays have been banned from entering the seminaries. Unfortunately the godless public schools haven't made such regulations, and as a result sexual molestation of students by teachers is escalating. You should be concerned about that.
 
Being unable to openly depict a natural part of being human was better? Then go hide your head in the sand.

People aren't going to change because you have sexually dysfunctional insecurities and hangups. Get over it.
Why do you encourage immoral sexual acts which damage relationships and families? Don't leftwingers have an ounce of caring in them?
 
No they aren't. Billions in settlements to cover it up. Keep a table between you and them.
Always follow the money (or the motive). As a journalist at the time, we knew full well that there was a worse problem in public schools and other organizations (including all other clergies) than there was in the Catholic Church. Try getting advertising money by blasting public schools. Next, the Catholic Church was knows to have money where public schools are paid for by tax payers. How many taxpayers would have been eager to pay billions in settlements for what was going on in public schools. An attempt to take down a Church is one thing, but not going after public schools or anything to do with government.

Next, during this scandal, do you know what else was happening in public schools--two of which I witnessed directly: Students who did not like a teacher arranged to be in a classroom alone with him (a friend was waiting outside) so they could claim the teacher was abusive toward her. The District, in both cases, decided they didn't want the notoriety, persuaded/paid one teacher to retire early. I had overheard the plot against the second teacher, and also recognized students who had also overheard. We went to the administration, and with the threat to be expelled or withdraw the allegation, the girls confessed, were transferred to another school, with a heads up attached to their school records.

Keep in mind: So many good, even excellent priests continued to work in the environment that was created by this. In other words, ninety-seven percent of priests were (by some) painted by the same brush as the two-to-three percent who were guilty.
 
Why do you encourage immoral sexual acts which damage relationships and families?
I merely pointed out the fact that the sexual revolution that you blame on the 60's was actually in full force during the 1940's and really began in the 1930's. You have been living under a very strange delusion. Snap out of it!

Don't leftwingers have an ounce of caring in them?
From where I am standing left-wingers are far more compassionate and caring for all people, especially for those that republicans are cheering about rounding up and deporting to concentration camps in despotic countries.

So stop with your whining already. Sexual immorality? Why can't it be like the 1940"s again? :crying: Waa waa waa.

Hypocrite.

1751915913413.webp
1751915952872.webp
1751915971759.webp
1751916026114.webp



Hubba Hubba!
 
Last edited:
Parents know better
Statistics show that ten percent of males abusing children are dating the mother. Eight percent are stepfathers. Do you recommend divorced mothers of daughters not date or remarry? Note, the statistics are about three times greater than those that involved priests.
 
Statistics show that ten percent of males abusing children are dating the mother. Eight percent are stepfathers. Do you recommend divorced mothers of daughters not date or remarry? Note, the statistics are about three times greater than those that involved priests.
I suggest you be careful with who you leave your child alone with.
 
I merely pointed out the fact that the sexual revolution that you blame on the 60's was actually in full force during the 1940's and really began in the 1930's. You have been living under a very strange delusion. Snap out of it!


From where I am standing left-wingers are far more compassionate and caring for all people, especially for those that republicans are cheering about rounding up and deporting to concentration camps in despotic countries.

So stop with your whining already. Sexual immorality? Why can't it be like the 1940"s again? :crying: Waa waa waa.

Hypocrite.

View attachment 1133471View attachment 1133474View attachment 1133475View attachment 1133477


Hubba Hubba!
For the fifth time, I am not talking about personal behavior of the 1940s; I’m talking about societal sanction of sexual immorality which exists now that did not exist then. I can’t imagine why that is so hard to understand.

Leftwingers don’t care about anything but power and control. They’re responsible for the flood of illegals we have which necessitates the deportation. They allowed it not out of compassion, but to steal elections
 
Last edited:
I’m talking about societal sanction of sexual immorality which exists now that did not exist then

You voted for Trump who had a child out of wedlock and was banging Porn Stars while his wife was home with his infant son

Your moral outrage does not impress me
 
Yes, it was better when pregnant 16 year old girls were social outcasts and stained forever

Make an example out of them
You have to admit there was a lot less sex outside marriage then, and a lot more intact families.
 
You have to admit there was a lot less sex outside marriage then, and a lot more intact families.
I remember families back then.
Shotgun marriage
Divorce was a sin
Domestic abuse
Loveless marriage
 
You voted for Trump who had a child out of wedlock and was banging Porn Stars while his wife was home with his infant son

Your moral outrage does not impress me
What year was that? He was a Democrat then, right? He’s not doing these things now. But yet your Clinton guy was doing this stuff on the job.
 
What year was that? He was a Democrat then, right? He’s not doing these things now. But yet your Clinton guy was doing this stuff on the job.

You mean there is a statute of limitations on morality?
Just because an 80 year old Trump is no longer hound dogging hot women and grabbing pussies…..that makes him a saint
 
You mean there is a statute of limitations on morality?
Just because an 80 year old Trump is no longer hound dogging hot women and grabbing pussies…..that makes him a saint
No evidence Trump ever did that. But yes, it makes a big difference that Clinton was doing it while in office. The son of a ***** was up all night chasing women. No wonder he was a horrible president.
 
15th post
No evidence Trump ever did that. But yes, it makes a big difference that Clinton was doing it while in office. The son of a ***** was up all night chasing women. No wonder he was a horrible president.
Yes there is evidence he did that
Her name is Tiffany

Trump was a known Playboy, married three times, divorced twice, cheated on them all, had a child out of wedlock.

You moan about declining morality in this country and vote for Trump three times

Hypocrisy thy name is Mashmount
 
Yes there is evidence he did that
Her name is Tiffany

Trump was a known Playboy, married three times, divorced twice, cheated on them all, had a child out of wedlock.

You moan about declining morality in this country and vote for Trump three times

Hypocrisy thy name is Mashmount
No evidence he grabbed anyone as you claimed. But your boy was doing it while in office. No comment on that? Had Clinton been president in the 40s, and he did what he did, he'd have been run out on a rail. As it is, you leftwingers celebrate him.

And thus my point is proven. I think we'll shut this down and mark it as yet another debate win for Mashmont.
 
No evidence he grabbed anyone as you claimed. But your boy was doing it while in office. No comment on that? Had Clinton been president in the 40s, and he did what he did, he'd have been run out on a rail. As it is, you leftwingers celebrate him.

And thus my point is proven. I think we'll shut this down and mark it as yet another debate win for Mashmont.

No evidence you would accept that Trump grabbed women by the ***** other than he bragged about it, a jury found him liable for it, 30 women claimed he did it to them.

What you can’t deny is daughter Tiffany born before Trump married her mother.

Your moral outrage seems partisan
 
Back
Top Bottom