iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,926
- 1,600
the bannings are now in full force. the liberal thought police have hit the streets and when you complain they reply "just "technical difficulty, it hits everyone" and expect people to keep believing that lie.
highlights bannings and censorship in review:
Twitter 'Shadow Banning' Republicans: Report | National Review
The phenomenon known as “shadow banning” has affected several conservative Republican lawmakers, including Representatives Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, as well as Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman Andrew Surabian. It has not extended to their counterparts on the left, whose accounts continue to auto-populate in Twitter search results.
----
the only one they DON'T seem to be doing this for is trump himself.
if the source is an issue, lets go here: Serving healthy conversation - twitters own blog.
Today, we use policies, human review processes, and machine learning to help us determine how Tweets are organized and presented in communal places like conversations and search. Now, we’re tackling issues of behaviors that distort and detract from the public conversation in those areas by integrating new behavioral signals into how Tweets are presented. By using new tools to address this conduct from a behavioral perspective, we’re able to improve the health of the conversation, and everyone’s experience on Twitter, without waiting for people who use Twitter to report potential issues to us
---------
so who made twitter the judge and jury on behavior? how come they can decide what is healthy and what is not? some of my best online friends i've "gone to war" with in the past to find that common ground - back then it was the hard way but those conversations did lead to positive outcomes.
led to a lot of bullshyte also yes but that's how life is around me and online. much moreso online as people can "hide" who they are and go on about their day w/o worry of someone yelling at them in walmart.
a friend of mine last night made a post about all the censoring going on and it was wrong. a bit later that night his messenger feed was suspended. no warning, no reason, just suspended. algorhythm? again show me left sources that suffer these same "glitches" and i'm there with you helping fix a system.
diamond and silk - they have proof facebook is limiting their reach and it was brought up in congress and the senate during the zuckerberg hearings. it was never really explained it was just "technical difficulties" which i hope we both know to be *cough* bull**** *cough*.
anyone have a link for this on i heard talked about yesterday where a republican congressman boosted his ads and facebook took his money and limited his reach anyway.
think its just me or a state of mind? humor me and do this:
search on "facebook banning conservatives" and see how many are complaining about it. next, swap out cons and put in liberals. duckduckgo gave me a ton of cons talking about it but liberals just bad some pages about "BAN LIBERALS" that were very "light" in likes for some reason.
if you see examples of liberals whining about being banned or censored on twitter or fb point them out to me, i'd love to know this is just "technical difficulties".
yesterday liberal rag VOX dove in and added to the list of things/people we need to ban. you see where this is going? it won't stop at 1 or 2. it NEVER EVER DOES. people will get like sharks with blood in the water and go nuts. if you think "no that seldom happens" how about i remind you of "we just want this 1 flag removed" and before long we're erasing history and the dukes of hazard became evil. heh, just 1 flag moved thats all we want.
yesterday twitter banned "sweet meteor of death's" page. a parody site. really? well hey, just one more ya know. then we'll stop. just one more site...
wait - that was already proven bullshit don't we? they don't stop they just push harder. human nature will only take so much and the push back is coming and the left is going to cry YOU JUST LOVE INFOWARS AND THAT LIAR!!!! and totally miss the reality of the situation in that *FUCK* infowars - they are no longer the point and honestly never have been.
the left telling the right how to live and taking liberties with the rights of conservatives you know they'd never allow done to them. you can't outlaw stupid cause you can't really define it to just people you hate and feel good at night.
so this is no longer about infowars and a few idiots. rest assured alex jones is an idiot. but the constitution says nothing of free speech only being for smart people and even if it did, define that to a common satisfaction.
we protect rights for all, or eventually those rights are gone and a hell of a fight breaks out at that point like nothing we've seen yet.
every time you think the right is just imagining it, please just say these 5 words...
"we just want one flag..."
highlights bannings and censorship in review:
Twitter 'Shadow Banning' Republicans: Report | National Review
The phenomenon known as “shadow banning” has affected several conservative Republican lawmakers, including Representatives Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, as well as Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman Andrew Surabian. It has not extended to their counterparts on the left, whose accounts continue to auto-populate in Twitter search results.
----
the only one they DON'T seem to be doing this for is trump himself.
if the source is an issue, lets go here: Serving healthy conversation - twitters own blog.
Today, we use policies, human review processes, and machine learning to help us determine how Tweets are organized and presented in communal places like conversations and search. Now, we’re tackling issues of behaviors that distort and detract from the public conversation in those areas by integrating new behavioral signals into how Tweets are presented. By using new tools to address this conduct from a behavioral perspective, we’re able to improve the health of the conversation, and everyone’s experience on Twitter, without waiting for people who use Twitter to report potential issues to us
---------
so who made twitter the judge and jury on behavior? how come they can decide what is healthy and what is not? some of my best online friends i've "gone to war" with in the past to find that common ground - back then it was the hard way but those conversations did lead to positive outcomes.
led to a lot of bullshyte also yes but that's how life is around me and online. much moreso online as people can "hide" who they are and go on about their day w/o worry of someone yelling at them in walmart.
a friend of mine last night made a post about all the censoring going on and it was wrong. a bit later that night his messenger feed was suspended. no warning, no reason, just suspended. algorhythm? again show me left sources that suffer these same "glitches" and i'm there with you helping fix a system.
diamond and silk - they have proof facebook is limiting their reach and it was brought up in congress and the senate during the zuckerberg hearings. it was never really explained it was just "technical difficulties" which i hope we both know to be *cough* bull**** *cough*.
anyone have a link for this on i heard talked about yesterday where a republican congressman boosted his ads and facebook took his money and limited his reach anyway.
think its just me or a state of mind? humor me and do this:
search on "facebook banning conservatives" and see how many are complaining about it. next, swap out cons and put in liberals. duckduckgo gave me a ton of cons talking about it but liberals just bad some pages about "BAN LIBERALS" that were very "light" in likes for some reason.
if you see examples of liberals whining about being banned or censored on twitter or fb point them out to me, i'd love to know this is just "technical difficulties".
yesterday liberal rag VOX dove in and added to the list of things/people we need to ban. you see where this is going? it won't stop at 1 or 2. it NEVER EVER DOES. people will get like sharks with blood in the water and go nuts. if you think "no that seldom happens" how about i remind you of "we just want this 1 flag removed" and before long we're erasing history and the dukes of hazard became evil. heh, just 1 flag moved thats all we want.
yesterday twitter banned "sweet meteor of death's" page. a parody site. really? well hey, just one more ya know. then we'll stop. just one more site...
wait - that was already proven bullshit don't we? they don't stop they just push harder. human nature will only take so much and the push back is coming and the left is going to cry YOU JUST LOVE INFOWARS AND THAT LIAR!!!! and totally miss the reality of the situation in that *FUCK* infowars - they are no longer the point and honestly never have been.
the left telling the right how to live and taking liberties with the rights of conservatives you know they'd never allow done to them. you can't outlaw stupid cause you can't really define it to just people you hate and feel good at night.
so this is no longer about infowars and a few idiots. rest assured alex jones is an idiot. but the constitution says nothing of free speech only being for smart people and even if it did, define that to a common satisfaction.
we protect rights for all, or eventually those rights are gone and a hell of a fight breaks out at that point like nothing we've seen yet.
every time you think the right is just imagining it, please just say these 5 words...
"we just want one flag..."