We have no need for more nuclear waste and hazards. Co2 does nothing. Hopefully Pam Bondi will prosecute Co2 Fraud immediately.

Nuclear waste has multiple uses, including recycling and disposal:
  • Recycling
    Most of the material in used nuclear fuel can be recycled, including uranium and plutonium. These elements can be mixed with fresh uranium to create new fuel rods. Recycling reduces the volume of high-level waste and the radiological footprint of waste.


  • Disposal
    Nuclear waste can be disposed of in a variety of ways, including:
    • Near-surface disposal: Suitable for short-lived waste and low-level waste.


    • Deep geological disposal: Suitable for long-lived waste and high-level waste.


    • Storage in dry casks: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licenses dry cask storage facilities for up to 40 years.


      • Storage in spent fuel pools: Fuel is typically cooled in the pool for at least five years before transfer to a cask.
The United States does not currently recycle spent nuclear fuel, but some advanced reactor designs could consume or run on it in the future.

Yup, waste is very little. I did read or watch a video (probably Sabrina? on YouTube) that the stats from the first nuclear reactor ever commissioned, all the waste would only cover a football field to 6 foot deep. And that's from all the world's reactors.
 
You know, physical size

2k tons according to you fits inside of a walnut shell...

In reality, to transport it, mass matters...
 
2k tons according to you fits inside of a walnut shell...

In reality, to transport it, mass matters...
Why does it need transporting?

You obviously found out we are not dealing with mountain of waste, just something the size of a walnut.

dealing with such a little amount if nuclear waste is not as dramatc as you made it sound
 
Last edited:
Why does it need transporting?

You obviously found out we are not dealing with mountain of waste, just something the size of a walnut.

dealing with such a little amount if nuclear waste is not as dramatc as you made it sound


says the Nuclear industry lobbyist....
 
You made a claim that is not true. I knew because I worked inside nuclear power plants


You are grotesquely minimizing risk and cost to taxpayers that is, in reality, huge....
 
You are grotesquely minimizing risk and cost to taxpayers that is, in reality, huge....
Cost of the waste? About as much as a swimming pool the size of a football field. Ignoring the fact the spent nuclear fuel can be used again and again.

Risk, nobody ever had a nuclear fuel accident, new or spent.

Epic fail to claim nuclear waste is a expensive problem
 
If Earth was really experiencing an ongoing net ice melt, then surely you can show us photos of land sinking as a result of that.


And if Earth was experiencing an ongoing net ice melt, that would release a lot of gas trapped in the glacier ice back into the atmosphere, increasing surface air pressure.... but that's not happening either, SAP is actually going down over the past 60 years...


It takes an IQ over 5 to notice these things....
"lot of gas trapped in the glacier ice back into the atmosphere, increasing surface air pressure" what gas is trapped in glaciers?
 
what gas is trapped in glaciers?


How do we know the Co2 content of the atmosphere over the past 100k years??

 
Back
Top Bottom