‘We have evidence’ to prosecute Obama

[Marener]

This is how a conversation with you goes

2 plus 2 equals 4
Prove it
What do you mean by prove it?
Prove it
It's in the historical record, 2 plus 2 equals 4, since ancient times.
So, you can't prove it on your own and are simply distracting.

This is how a conversation goes with you.

Obama is a criminal.
What did he do?
Broke the law.
How?
By doing illegal things.
What things?
The things the evidence shows.
What does the evidence show?
<they disappear>

 

[Marener]

They have been submitted to the DOJ for CRIMINAL prosecution.

What did they do that warrants criminal prosecution?

 

[Meister]

My truth us not defined by dumbfuck podcasts and Fox News.

Perhaps if the msm would do what they're were hired to do
in a non bias way, we all could get to the bottom of this. Just
because they don't report on it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

 

[Donald H]

Verifiable facts can be found in the landmark Volume 5 report: The 1,000 page document that the GOP Senate released in 2020 that laid bare the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election, on behalf of Trump.



Then there's also the Mueller report, which identified many encrypted communications between the Trump campaign and Russian agents. When questioned about the contents of those communications, Trump campaign members plead the Fifth every single time.

The Russians interfered, the same as America interferes in other country's elections. That's not the issue.

I just though everybody should know that --

The issue is whether or not Trump was complicit in the interference.

There's probably no way of proving that unless Russia turns against him and spills the beans.

But even then, if Trump holds power there's no crimes that can ever be proven against him...

I've been warning you donkeys for years about how democracy can fall so suddenly to fascism!

 

[Marener]

Perhaps if the msm would do what they're were hired to do
in a non bias way, we all could get to the bottom of this. Just
because they don't report on it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

The media doesn’t cover pure hype and trolling from Trump administration toadies.

The media should cover actual stories.

There’s nothing here to report on other than Gabbard’s desperate attempt to create a scandal out of nothing.

 

[Billiejeens]

They live in a parallel universe and can’t be reached. The second you start trying to talk about facts, they vanish.

Prior to the election in 2016 the Obama Intelligence officials told Obama that Russia did not have the capability to interfere in our election.
After the election the Obama Intelligence officials told Obama that Russia did not interfere.

Obama told the Intelligence officials to go back and produce a PDB that told him how they did it, not if.

From there the Hoax Exploded.

Weaponizing the intelligence agencies against a political opponent does not qualify as normal Presidential Duties.

 

[Meister]

What did they do that warrants criminal prosecution?

Off the top of my head.....they lied to Congress.

Where were you when Trumps people were taking
judicial hits in Trump's first term?

 

[Donald H]

Perhaps if the msm would do what they're were hired to do
in a non bias way, we all could get to the bottom of this. Just
because they don't report on it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Are you seriously suggesting cooperation?

 

[Marener]

Off the top of my head.....they lied to Congress.

Where were you when Trumps people were taking
judicial hits in Trump's first term?

That has nothing to do with what Gabbard is suggesting here. That accusation has been around for years and couldn’t be prosecuted by Durham. You’re just recycling old garbage.

 

[Meister]

The media doesn’t cover pure hype and trolling from Trump administration toadies.

The media should cover actual stories.

There’s nothing here to report on other than Gabbard’s desperate attempt to create a scandal out of nothing.

No, they are covering up the facts.....like they always do and it's why that
the msm isn't believed by the majority of the People.

 

[shockedcanadian]

You're out of your rabid ass mind comparing Americans to the French Revolution.
For one thing, we did it first. And we spread books and bibles, not burned them.
1776 comes before 1789, did you go to Canadian public school?
You get a Babu no for that one.

The only thing between us and the commie French that's the same is a little bit of violence.
Ours was much different than theirs. Probably more humane, too. Ours promoted religion, theirs did the opposite.
We are not the same.
But by The Grace of God go We.
That's why that French fleet sunk. Never underestimate the power of little old ladies' prayers.

Read my posting in full.

Perhaps it is you who cannot appreciate the decades of "warm up" before the actual French Revolution. Indeed, they both inspired the other. Where did the British who left the Monarchy get the idea that they could exist without a King?

I guarantee you they drew this inspiration from the many years of French influence. The French King just never expected it would be his head on a stick.

 

[Billiejeens]

The media doesn’t cover pure hype and trolling from Trump administration toadies.

The media should cover actual stories.

There’s nothing here to report on other than Gabbard’s desperate attempt to create a scandal out of nothing.

The fact that your Democrat Media covers up any wrongdoing by your side is how they remain a viable party and one way that you remain ignorant.

 

[Meister]

That has nothing to do with what Gabbard is suggesting here. That accusation has been around for years and couldn’t be prosecuted by Durham. You’re just recycling old garbage.

Riiiight!!

 

[M14 Shooter]

My truth us not defined by dumbfuck podcasts and Fox News.

Of course not - it is brought to you 5 times a week in MSDNC talking points

The declassified documents are here:

https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Declassified-Evidence-Obama-Subvert-President-Trump-2016-Victory-Election-July2025.pdf

Demonstrate the DNIs assessment to be false.

 

[Billiejeens]

No, they are covering up the facts.....like they always do and it's why that
the msm isn't believed by the majority of the People.

I kind of wonder sometimes if marener could be samantha power or susan rice, or someone else.

No one could be as hard-core stupid and oblivious as it is without a vested interest.

 

[Marener]

No, they are covering up the facts.....like they always do and it's why that
the msm isn't believed by the majority of the People.

What facts were “covered up”?

 

[Meister]

I kind of wonder sometimes if marener could be samantha power or susan rice, or someone else.

No one could be as hard-core stupid and oblivious as it is without a vested interest.

Well....in all honesty there was one on this board, and the first initial of
her name was B.
Having said that, she is in the tank with the socialist/communist party.
Twisting the actual facts and arguing apparently that the documents don't exist
is just beyond the pale.

 

[Edgetho]

I kind of wonder sometimes if marener could be samantha power or susan rice, or someone else.

No one could be as hard-core stupid and oblivious as it is without a vested interest.

Or a Paid interest.

You know those millions the dimocrap scum party is spending to 'reach out' to the voting public?

Table of Contents

• What is a bot farm?
• What’s the difference between bot farms and click farms?
• Why are bot farms a thing?
• Bot farm crackdown
• What do bot farms mean for you
• What does bot activity look like?
• How can you protect yourself from bot farms?

 

[MagicMike]

MSN

Story by Annabella Rosciglione, Washington Examiner

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed there was evidence to prosecute former President Barack Obama for his administration's intelligence assessment of Russia’s 2016 election interference.

Gabbard declassified documents last week that she claimed provided evidence that the Obama administration’s intelligence officials “manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork” for the FBI’s later investigation into Russian ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Gabbard said she was referring documents from Obama administration officials to the Justice Department in a “criminal matter."

“We’re going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose,” Gabbard said on Fox News.

Comment:
The American people need to see some justice served to Obama and the Democrats for the crimes that the have committed against our country.
The Democrats have a very strange idea of " democracy".
They believe that politicizing and weaponizing our own government agencies is "democracy".
The Progressives think that stuffing ballot boxes, counting ballots behind locked doors, blocking voter ID laws, raiding the president's home, ludicrous lawsuits against opponents, kangaroo court convictions against opponents, removing opponents from the ballot... is "democracy"

​

We are still waiting on that Epstein client list Trump promised his "weakling, loser" supporters.
You MAGAts should probably demand that he come clean on THAT promise before you swallow yet another conspiracy theory hook,ine, and sinker.

 

[Marener]

Riiiight!!

You don’t remember Durham? Biden gave him years to investigate unimpeded and he got a plea bargain on one person with no jail time. He tried to prosecute a few others but failed miserably.