‘We have evidence’ to prosecute Obama


Story by Annabella Rosciglione, Washington Examiner

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed there was evidence to prosecute former President Barack Obama for his administration's intelligence assessment of Russia’s 2016 election interference.

Gabbard declassified documents last week that she claimed provided evidence that the Obama administration’s intelligence officials “manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork” for the FBI’s later investigation into Russian ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Gabbard said she was referring documents from Obama administration officials to the Justice Department in a “criminal matter."

“We’re going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose,” Gabbard said on Fox News.

Comment:
The American people need to see some justice served to Obama and the Democrats for the crimes that the have committed against our country.
The Democrats have a very strange idea of " democracy".
They believe that politicizing and weaponizing our own government agencies is "democracy".
The Progressives think that stuffing ballot boxes, counting ballots behind locked doors, blocking voter ID laws, raiding the president's home, ludicrous lawsuits against opponents, kangaroo court convictions against opponents, removing opponents from the ballot... is "democracy"

1753068733251.webp
 
The same people who were sure Comey was going to be charged with threatening the president are also convinced Obama is going to be charged with, uh, espionage? Lol
 
I don't want Øbama formally charged, we shouldn't do ex-Presidents, although Biden and Garland did it to Trump.

They can name him [Øbama] as an unindicted co-conspirator.
Wasn’t it Obama that was the head “nobody is above the law” cheerleader?

**** him, full charges.
 

Story by Annabella Rosciglione, Washington Examiner

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed there was evidence to prosecute former President Barack Obama for his administration's intelligence assessment of Russia’s 2016 election interference.

Gabbard declassified documents last week that she claimed provided evidence that the Obama administration’s intelligence officials “manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork” for the FBI’s later investigation into Russian ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Gabbard said she was referring documents from Obama administration officials to the Justice Department in a “criminal matter."

“We’re going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose,” Gabbard said on Fox News.

Comment:
The American people need to see some justice served to Obama and the Democrats for the crimes that the have committed against our country.
The Democrats have a very strange idea of " democracy".
They believe that politicizing and weaponizing our own government agencies is "democracy".
The Progressives think that stuffing ballot boxes, counting ballots behind locked doors, blocking voter ID laws, raiding the president's home, ludicrous lawsuits against opponents, kangaroo court convictions against opponents, removing opponents from the ballot... is "democracy"

Except that the Supreme Court said that anything he did as president cannot be prosecuted. So a dude who hasn't been president for more than 8 years, could be impeached, but what's the point?
 
“Please pay attention to this stupid bullshit that will go nowhere and stop talking about Epstein.”
 
Except the corrupt conservatives on SCOTUS said the president is above the law.

Whoops!

The SCOTUS has been very consistent for over 100 years - things done pursuant to official duties are just about untouchable.

However things NOT pursuant to official duties are definitely touchable. Like Nixon and Watergate. The break in was partisan, it had nothing to do with official duties.

Spying on and instigating fake charges against the opposition candidate falls into the latter category. They can't touch Obama for a lot of things but they might have a shot at this one.

If it were me I'd go after Brennan and Comey and Clapper first, the intel side of this is dirty and should be exposed and corrected. Going after Obama probably won't help but it would be fun watching tens of thousands of libtard heads exploding all the same time. :p
 
Charges for what exactly? I swear none of you actually care what you’re supposed to be upset about.
Well, we can can assume that indictments are imminent, so we'll be able to find out then.

Surely the Director of National Intelligence for the United States of America wouldn't come out with words this stark and damning about a former President of the United States without being able to quickly back them up with action and voluminous evidence. Surely that wouldn't happen.

Certainly using terms like "years-long coup" and "treasonous" to describe the actions of people at the very top of our government will mean that incontrovertable evidence will be arriving forthwith. No one at her level throws words like that around otherwise.

Right?
 
Last edited:
One thing is certain: when a political party is screaming about the other party being fascist, it is projection to hide their fascist tendencies. When one party is screaming about Democracy it is projection to hide their anti-democratic tendencies. When one party is screaming about Justice it is projection to hide their corruption. Another thing is certain: now we know why the establishment was so panicked about an outsider entering the WH. The possibility that their whole charade will be exposed was so great that they had no choice but to target him. By the time Trump's second term is over and all the nefarious shit the democraps (and the establishment RINOs) has been exposed, it will be the death of the democrap party and the DC political machine.
 

Story by Annabella Rosciglione, Washington Examiner

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed there was evidence to prosecute former President Barack Obama for his administration's intelligence assessment of Russia’s 2016 election interference.

Gabbard declassified documents last week that she claimed provided evidence that the Obama administration’s intelligence officials “manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork” for the FBI’s later investigation into Russian ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Gabbard said she was referring documents from Obama administration officials to the Justice Department in a “criminal matter."

“We’re going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose,” Gabbard said on Fox News.

Comment:
The American people need to see some justice served to Obama and the Democrats for the crimes that the have committed against our country.
The Democrats have a very strange idea of " democracy".
They believe that politicizing and weaponizing our own government agencies is "democracy".
The Progressives think that stuffing ballot boxes, counting ballots behind locked doors, blocking voter ID laws, raiding the president's home, ludicrous lawsuits against opponents, kangaroo court convictions against opponents, removing opponents from the ballot... is "democracy"

It's called 'distraction', first it was 'we're going to investigate Comey & Brennan, and when that didn't stick, now it's Obama. And if you believe this bullpucky, especially from a turncoat democrat, I've got a mail order bride from Slovenia with model ambitions to sell you.
 

Story by Annabella Rosciglione, Washington Examiner

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed there was evidence to prosecute former President Barack Obama for his administration's intelligence assessment of Russia’s 2016 election interference.

Gabbard declassified documents last week that she claimed provided evidence that the Obama administration’s intelligence officials “manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork” for the FBI’s later investigation into Russian ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Gabbard said she was referring documents from Obama administration officials to the Justice Department in a “criminal matter."

“We’re going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose,” Gabbard said on Fox News.

Comment:
The American people need to see some justice served to Obama and the Democrats for the crimes that the have committed against our country.
The Democrats have a very strange idea of " democracy".
They believe that politicizing and weaponizing our own government agencies is "democracy".
The Progressives think that stuffing ballot boxes, counting ballots behind locked doors, blocking voter ID laws, raiding the president's home, ludicrous lawsuits against opponents, kangaroo court convictions against opponents, removing opponents from the ballot... is "democracy"

Another nothing burger.
 
How the **** do you figure we followed in the foot steps of the idiotic French Revolution? You just flunked your Citizenship test. Our revolution was decades before the sickness and depravity of the French Revolution, which, BTW gave us socialism, communism, fascism, the Reign of Terror, etc, etc, etc. They got it wrong. Dead wrong. They out-smarted themselves

But, they ARE French, afterall. What else can you expect? :dunno:

The French Revolution was about equality. The American Revolution was about personal liberty.
 
Spying on and instigating fake charges against the opposition candidate falls into the latter category. They can't touch Obama for a lot of things but they might have a shot at this one.
Law enforcement and national security are exclusive authorities of the president.
 
You don't have evidence of anything. we have proof that trump is using his office to seek revenge on those he doesn't like..

There are documents
There are whistleblowers

There is no denying it.
You can explain why you don't care -

But there is no way to deny it
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom