We Finally Know the Case Against Trump, and It Is Strong

Cohen's conviction documents in a court of law can be used as evidence of the crime that Cohen committed and to show that Trump falsified business records to hid that crime.

WW
That's right. And Bragg does not have to spend any time arguing that those crimes occured. He can simply state it as fact, and it is then a fact in the record.
 
That's right. And Bragg does not have to spend any time arguing that those crimes occured. He can simply state it as fact, and it is then a fact in the record.

Bragg's responsibility will be showing the "intent" portion of Section 175.10, which will be pretty easy to do seeing as how Cohen invoiced the Trump Organization for payment establishing an unimpeachable paper trail connecting the two.

WW
 
That's right. And Bragg does not have to spend any time arguing that those crimes occured. He can simply state it as fact, and it is then a fact in the record.
Afraid not. None of those claims have been presented to a jury.
 
Bragg's responsibility will be showing the "intent" portion of Section 175.10, which will be pretty easy to do seeing as how Cohen invoiced the Trump Organization for payment establishing an unimpeachable paper trail connecting the two.

WW
So what's the "other crime" this law keeps refering to? Bragg doesn't even have to mention it? You think he doesn't have to prove there was an "other crime?"

I love these novel legal theories progs invent.
 
Afraid not. None of those claims have been presented to a jury.

Cohen had to appear before the court and confirm the facts of the case as part of pleading guilty.

No jury was required to convict him, he admitted it was true. Then turned over all the supporting documentation to the prosecutors. Information and records that can now be part of the Trump business record falsification case. Such as the audio records that Cohen made of Trump on the matter.

WW
 
So what's the "other crime" this law keeps refering to? Bragg doesn't even have to mention it? You think he doesn't have to prove there was an "other crime?"

I love these novel legal theories progs invent.

1681057767260.webp


Cohen's conviction.

From the Statement of Facts filed with the court and unsealed at the same time as Trump's indictment.


WW
 
Cohen's conviction documents in a court of law can be used as evidence of the crime that Cohen committed and to show that Trump falsified business records to hid that crime.

WW
He wasn't convicted in any court of law. He submitted a plea. No jury reviewed any of the facts of his case. How can you prove that Trump falisifed business records when you haven't even proven that he made an illegal camaign contribution?
 
None of those claims have been presented to a jury.
As they are mentioned in the statement of facts accompanying the grand jury's indictment, clearly they were.

Notice that little nugget: "Statement of facts"
 
It sure does, in any court on the land.
Wrong. Plea bargains have never been used as evidence in any trial.

For making demonstrably and factually false statements in a court of law. In fact, the judge will probably warn them not to do so, before the trial begins.
They aren't false, and no one can demonstrate they are.
 
Plea bargains have never been used as evidence in any trial.
Well that's a hilarious lie you just made up. They are convictions. The plea bargain is irrelevant.


They aren't false,
They are. And they are demonstrably so, as the convictions are a matter of fact.

You really aren't getting this.
 
Well that's a hilarious lie you just made up. They are convictions. The plea bargain is irrelevant.
Only to morons like you

They are. And they are demonstrably so, as the convictions are a matter of fact.

You really aren't getting this.
They are not false. End of story.

You only prove that you lack the capacity to commit logic.
 
That's right. And Bragg does not have to spend any time arguing that those crimes occured. He can simply state it as fact, and it is then a fact in the record.
Of course he does. It's not a fact. It's only a plea.
 
Only to morons like you


They are not false. End of story.

You only prove that you lack the capacity to commit logic.
Sorry, but they are facts. And they will be entered into the record at trial. And no amount of hissy fit by you will change that.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom