We are not alone?

Sure but I don't think you will ever see it.
I see it every time I look out the window .. after all we are sharing the same universe as those planets that are estimated to number in the septillions ... think about that ! I'm no mathematician or astronomist but its unreasonable to believe there is no life out there when all you have to do is look in your backyard 'literally' to see it .
 
Last edited:
Currently. FTL travel is theoretically possible.
maybe for us but other advanced civilizations could have discovered a way to bend space and time .. scientists have already observed a tiny warp bubble !

No, a warp bubble has not been "discovered" in the sense of a practical application or a large-scale, functional warp drive. Rather, in late 2021, a DARPA-funded team led by former NASA scientist Dr. Harold G. White reported the accidental observation of a tiny, lab-created phenomenon they described as a "real, albeit humble and tiny, warp bubble" within Casimir cavities. This finding, based on altering the geometry of Casimir cavities, could be a crucial step in realizing warp drive technology by demonstrating the physical conditions required to form a warp bubble, as theorized by Miguel Alcubierre, although it is still purely theoretical and far from enabling faster-than-light travel.

What happened

    • DARPA-funded research:
      Dr. Harold G. "Sonny" White and his team at the Limitless Space Institute (LSI) were not looking for warp bubbles. They were studying Casimir cavities and their energy-producing potential.
    • Accidental discovery:
      The tiny warp bubble appeared as an unexpected result of a project examining Casimir cavities and their energy.
    • Significance:
      The discovery is significant because it's considered the first time a real, physical warp bubble has been observed.
    • Theoretical implications:
      The observation aligns with Alcubierre's theories on warp drives by providing a physical understanding of how to create a real warp bubble.
What it means for warp drives
    • Tiny, not a spacecraft:
      The phenomenon is a tiny, microscopic structure, not a working engine capable of propelling a spacecraft.
    • First step:
      The discovery is seen as a significant first step towards building a full-scale warp drive, potentially revolutionizing future space travel.
    • Future experiments:
      White's team plans more experiments to better understand warp bubbles and to work toward creating larger models.
 
Maybe BEES are a dominant race on some other planet
1758576828991.webp
 
Why? I don't care if you believe computer viruses meet the requirements of living things anymore than I cared that you believe the sun triggers glacial or interglacial periods.
Because you said details matter. So, please list the differences.
 
You have to start with how many there are and then multiple that with the probability for each requirement. It gets small real fast.
Not really. According to Robert Forward, there are at least a million possible planets in our galaxy alone.
 
maybe for us but other advanced civilizations could have discovered a way to bend space and time .. scientists have already observed a tiny warp bubble !

No, a warp bubble has not been "discovered" in the sense of a practical application or a large-scale, functional warp drive. Rather, in late 2021, a DARPA-funded team led by former NASA scientist Dr. Harold G. White reported the accidental observation of a tiny, lab-created phenomenon they described as a "real, albeit humble and tiny, warp bubble" within Casimir cavities. This finding, based on altering the geometry of Casimir cavities, could be a crucial step in realizing warp drive technology by demonstrating the physical conditions required to form a warp bubble, as theorized by Miguel Alcubierre, although it is still purely theoretical and far from enabling faster-than-light travel.

What happened

    • DARPA-funded research:
      Dr. Harold G. "Sonny" White and his team at the Limitless Space Institute (LSI) were not looking for warp bubbles. They were studying Casimir cavities and their energy-producing potential.
    • Accidental discovery:
      The tiny warp bubble appeared as an unexpected result of a project examining Casimir cavities and their energy.
    • Significance:
      The discovery is significant because it's considered the first time a real, physical warp bubble has been observed.
    • Theoretical implications:
      The observation aligns with Alcubierre's theories on warp drives by providing a physical understanding of how to create a real warp bubble.
What it means for warp drives
    • Tiny, not a spacecraft:
      The phenomenon is a tiny, microscopic structure, not a working engine capable of propelling a spacecraft.
    • First step:
      The discovery is seen as a significant first step towards building a full-scale warp drive, potentially revolutionizing future space travel.
    • Future experiments:
      White's team plans more experiments to better understand warp bubbles and to work toward creating larger models.
Teleportation has also been accomplished. More and more these ideas once though fanciful are turning into mere engineering problems.
 
Sure but I don't think you will ever see it.
on that you may be right .. if they had the technology to visit why would any advanced civilization want to visit a planet where the inhabitants are constantly at war ..
 
Our solar system is not very special. It only got one star.
 
Do computer viruses need cellular life to reproduce? ... more important, do computer viruses evolve from cellular life? ...
Nope, and nope.

Neither do regular viruses.
 
Neither do regular viruses.
Maybe.

The origin of viruses
The exact evolutionary origin of viruses is still unknown and is a subject of debate among scientists. However, several hypotheses exist, and it is possible that different viruses originated through different mechanisms.
  • The Progressive ("Escape") Hypothesis: This theory suggests that viruses evolved from genetic elements, such as plasmids or transposons, that "escaped" from the genomes of larger organisms. These genetic elements gained the ability to move between cells and developed a protective protein coat.
  • The Regressive ("Reduction") Hypothesis: This theory proposes that viruses were once more complex, free-living organisms that lost genetic information over time as they became parasitic. Their reliance on a host cell led to the reduction of their own cellular components. The discovery of large, complex "giant viruses," such as the mimivirus, provides some evidence for this idea.
  • The "Virus-First" Hypothesis: This suggests that viruses co-evolved with the first primitive cells from complex molecules of nucleic acid and proteins. In this scenario, viruses predate or existed alongside early cellular life forms.
 
Which virus doesn't need a cellular host? ...
Obviously the computer virus. But it still requires a host. So then the discussion morphs into, "can a computer be considered a cellular structure"?
 
Obviously the computer virus. But it still requires a host. So then the discussion morphs into, "can a computer be considered a cellular structure"?

The cell membrane is a very specific structure ... usually a bi-lipid layer that separates the cellular contents from the outside environment ... with ion channels that move nutrients in, and waste products out ... it's this cell membrane that defines cellular life ... all cellular life has this structure ...

We can use other definitions if you want ... but with this one, computer viruses are no more "alive" than a dead cat ...

... in a box ...
 
15th post
The cell membrane is a very specific structure ... usually a bi-lipid layer that separates the cellular contents from the outside environment ... with ion channels that move nutrients in, and waste products out ... it's this cell membrane that defines cellular life ... all cellular life has this structure ...

We can use other definitions if you want ... but with this one, computer viruses are no more "alive" than a dead cat ...

... in a box ...
In a biological sense I agree, but schrodinger aside, I find the conversation interesting.
 
There are billions if not trillions of galaxies in the known universe. Galaxy's, like the Milky Way. There is life out there. Even a small fraction means that there may be millions of planets inhabited by life in one form or another. But, we'll never know for sure.
The Milky Way holds 200 billion stars, and an estimated 3.2 trillion planets. Our galaxy is just one of the 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe. So just in what we can see, there are some 6.4 septillion planets. And they reckon what we can see is probably a tiny fraction of all galaxies. So with those odds, there's bound to be life kicking about. Trouble is, space is far too big to ever find out.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom