Zone1 We are all NATURAL THEISTS with “homage to reason” unless we lock~in to or against revealed theist-ism vs anti-revelation atheist-ism

[Foxfyre]

Again, so what? He thought that Jesus came up with some good morals. Many other people did too and they lived centuries before Jesus. Look up the Hammurabi code. Does that mean the writer of those was divine or that the code had good morals? Jesus had SOME good moral values. So what?

If that's what you got out of my post, I can put you on a growing list of those who need a good remedial reading comprehension course.

You might want to address what I actually said?

 

[ding]

Yes. It is highly detrimental to humans, society, and the further evolution of mankind.

Would you like to round up all believes and put them in camps?

 

[Foxfyre]

who's kidding who -


View attachment 1115171

they were so well meaning ....



there are other true religions than those madeup ones from the desert or the true one jesus is crucified for to this day by those same referred in their unsubstantiated bibles of false commandments hereditary idolatresses religions of apartheid et al.

- in comparison to secular atheism which is the historical pariah.

I can't have a discussion with someone so tunnel visioned they are incapable of actually addressing what I said. Do have a great day though.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

So glad you admitted that.

Thank you.

 

[ding]

Thank you.

You are welcome. Couple that with your desire to abolish religion and we get a militant atheist of the first order who walks in lock step with Lenin and Mao.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

If that's what you got out of my post, I can put you on a growing list of those who need a good remedial reading comprehension course.

You might want to address what I actually said?

Well, good for you. You want to shoehorn in the morals of Jesus that Jefferson agreed with into the story that he was sent somehow by God.

Did you know that he was considered a lesser god for centuries by many? The ridiculous notion of a trinity wasn't agreed to until 325 years later and that was only because they wanted to eliminate those who believed he was only a son, which made him a lesser god.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Would you like to round up all believes and put them in camps?

OMG. Such nonsensical hyperbole. Who is saying put them in camps? They are indoctrinated into a belief but so are Muslims, Mormons, Holy Rollers, and scores of others who happened to be born to parents who were taught that by their parents who were taught by theirs, and so on.

 

[Foxfyre]

Well, good for you. You want to shoehorn in the morals of Jesus that Jefferson agreed with into the story that he was sent somehow by God.

Did you know that he was considered a lesser god for centuries by many? The ridiculous notion of a trinity wasn't agreed to until 325 years later and that was only because they wanted to eliminate those who believed he was only a son, which made him a lesser god.

Again, when you are ready to address what I actually said instead of what you are trying to pretend I said, get back to me. Until then do have a lovely day.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

You are welcome. Couple that with your desire to abolish religion and we get a militant atheist of the first order who walks in lock step with Lenin and Mao.

Like you tried to tag me with socialists and Communists and that didn't work, you disparage my nonbelief of your whacked-out Catholicism, which I grew up under the thumb of, as being in line with Lenin and Mao. Your teachers have taught you well that you should never defend your crazy beliefs but always to attack the nonbelievers and try to tag them into some tribe that is off the wall.

Good work, ding. You're an engineer? My lord! Heaven help us.

 

[ding]

Like you tried to tag me with socialists and Communists and that didn't work, you disparage my nonbelief of your whacked-out Catholicism, which I grew up under the thumb of, as being in line with Lenin and Mao. Your teachers have taught you well that you should never defend your crazy beliefs but always to attack the nonbelievers and try to tag them into some tribe that is off the wall.

Good work, ding. You're an engineer? My lord! Heaven help us.

I don't need to try. You literally volunteered for it with your own words. You said religion is a detriment to society. You said you would ban religion. The only thing you haven't said yet is that you would round up religious persons and put them in camps.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Again, when you are ready to address what I actually said instead of what you are trying to pretend I said, get back to me. Until then do have a lovely day.

I already did. Not my fault you didn't like my post or cannot deal with it.

 

[ding]

I already did. Not my fault you didn't like my post or cannot deal with it.

Would you like to put her in a camp?

 

[BreezeWood]

He believed in a moralistic and providential creator.

jefferson knew the desert religions as an excuse to persecute and victimize the innocent and why they opposed them particularly their bibles.

 

[ding]

jefferson knew the desert religions as an excuse to persecute and victimize the innocent and why they opposed them particularly their bibles.

 

[BreezeWood]

I can't have a discussion with someone so tunnel visioned they are incapable of actually addressing what I said. Do have a great day though.

- in comparison to secular atheism which is the historical pariah.

who's kidding who ...

try something other than a sand box for your information.

 

[BreezeWood]

jefferson knew the desert religions as an excuse to persecute and victimize the innocent and why they opposed them particularly their bibles.

google is your friend - at least for most.

 

[ding]

google is your friend - at least for most.

Then it should be easy for you to back up all of your baseless allegations.

 

[ding]

OMG. Such nonsensical hyperbole. Who is saying put them in camps? They are indoctrinated into a belief but so are Muslims, Mormons, Holy Rollers, and scores of others who happened to be born to parents who were taught that by their parents who were taught by theirs, and so on.

Putting them in camps is the logical conclusion of your beliefs. According to you religion is detrimental to society. According to you religion should be subordinated and abolished. How do you think you are going to subordinate all those religious believers without putting them in camps? It would be in society's best interest, right?

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Putting them in camps is the logical conclusion of your beliefs. According to you religion is detrimental to society. According to you religion should be subordinated and abolished. How do you think you are going to subordinate all those religious believers without putting them in camps? It would be in society's best interest, right?

Just stop with your diversions and deflections that allow you to continue keeping your crazy beliefs in a sky Daddy three in one god who loves you all the while sending non believers to hell making you special. He is a detestable thug worse than all the maniacal humans who ever lived.

 

[ding]

Just stop with your diversions and deflections that allow you to continue keeping your crazy beliefs in a sky Daddy three in one god who loves you all the while sending non believers to hell making you special. He is a detestable thug worse than all the maniacal humans who ever lived.

They aren't diversions or deflections. They are your own words. If something is HIGHLY detrimental to society, then you would be in your rights to do something about it, right?