Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
So, the government should not get involved with anything concerning children, huh?Or just that the government should stay out of it. Republicans used to believe that too.
Those ISIS boys are really going to love that idea.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, the government should not get involved with anything concerning children, huh?Or just that the government should stay out of it. Republicans used to believe that too.
I'm not religious either, but most conservatives are, especially here on this forum.I'm not in the least bit religious.
You make the same mistake as Zinc in framing the entire world as two extremely simplistic forces that are squared off in battle, and there are only three two simple choices.ely projecting.
Just because your own views are those of a fundamentalist, that does not mean those who oppose this child grooming are ALSO fundamentalist.
You are merely projecting.
We aren'tI'm not religious either, but most conservatives are, especially here on this forum.
So what.I'm not religious either, but most conservatives are, especially here on this forum.
And you know this how?I'm not religious either, but most conservatives are, especially here on this forum.
So, the government should not get involved with anything concerning children, huh?
Those ISIS boys are really going to love that idea.
Good!The new laws will outlaw "transitioning" youth who say they want to change genders. No more sex change operations for minors, no more hormone treatments for kids either. Period. Against the law, malpractice waged against any so-called "medical professional" who would administer such an atrocity.
Yep.Idea for idea we ae quickly getting to the point where Democrat positions are more extreme that ISIS.
Scary.
I agree with your concern for children on this issue but you and other conservatives don't care if those same children are living in a homeless shelter with their parents. The irony of conservatism. Supposedly they're pro-life because they fight for fetuses in other people's wombs but don't care if the pregnant woman is dirt poor and can't raise her child once it is born. They defund social programs that help single mothers raise their children. There's a contradiction there. An inconsistency.So what.
You have no ******* idea what I support or don't support. I support gay marriage, I do not support gay conversion therapy, and I have no problem with adults making decisions for themselves.
Some of you are simply so extreme that you think anybody who is not as extreme as you is extreme in the other direction.
For about the zillionth time - this is about protecting childhood and wanting children to be able to grow up normally without a bunch of idiots trying to indoctrinate them sexually FAR before they are ready.
How am I a conservative?I agree with your concern for children on this issue but you and other conservatives don't care if those same children are living in a homeless shelter with their parents. The irony of conservatism. Supposedly they're pro-life because they fight for fetuses in other people's wombs but don't care if the pregnant woman is dirt poor and can't raise her child once it is born. They defund social programs that help single mothers raise their children. There's a contradiction there. An inconsistency.
Why make it easier?I am sure you wish that were true.
Of those molesting a child under six, 50 percent were family members. Family members also accounted for 23 percent of those abusing children ages 12 to 17xi. More than 90 percent of girls in juvenile justice systems self-disclose trauma.
CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE FACTS
What "social programs that help single mothers raise their children" has seen actual cuts that were not the result of it being folded into another program? IOW, where have "conservatives" done this?I agree with your concern for children on this issue but you and other conservatives don't care if those same children are living in a homeless shelter with their parents. The irony of conservatism. Supposedly they're pro-life because they fight for fetuses in other people's wombs but don't care if the pregnant woman is dirt poor and can't raise her child once it is born. They defund social programs that help single mothers raise their children. There's a contradiction there. An inconsistency.
How am I a conservative?
I am seeking to protect innocent children from being exploited by adults with a sexual/political agenda.
Protecting the vulnerable against exploitation arising from those in power is a LIBERAL notion dumb shit
To the simple-minded, liberal = good, conservative = bad. If you take a position in any way contrary to theirs, you are bad and therefore a conservative. That's just how their minds work.How am I a conservative?
I am seeking to protect innocent children from being exploited by adults with a sexual/political agenda.
Protecting the vulnerable against exploitation arising from those in power is a LIBERAL notion dumb shit
A low population density area is the perfect place for few to no restrictions on firearm ownership. BTW, there are over a million people living in Montana. Really big cruise ships there.Montana has the same population as a cruise ship, ok maybe two...
You seem to be confusing gender with sexuality, but i can't say that I'm surprised. You people all have your heads where the sun don't shineI will reply as I see fit.
You say you were in child protective services yet you talk about children as young as 2 being sexual.
Nothing alarming about that!
He's just tossing out everything but the kitchen sink, here, with the usual litany of cliche's that have NOTHING to do with the subject matter.What "social programs that help single mothers raise their children" has seen actual cuts that were not the result of it being folded into another program? IOW, where have "conservatives" done this?
Ah, so THAT'S why you talk about the sexual awakening of 2-4 year olds.You seem to be confusing gender with sexuality, but i can't say that I'm surprised. You people all have your heads where the sun don't shine
Thats fair.A low population density area is the perfect place for few to no restrictions on firearm ownership.