- Mar 1, 2008
- 49,931
- 17,316
- 2,250
Uh as he said,you really should stop now before making yourself an even greater fool than you already have this whole timethe fact you missed the evidence he posted just before the babble of yours.lolI did enjoy that. Thanks. Now can you show me where Obama prosecuted anyone? Just because you put Obamas name in front of everything doesnt mean he personally did anything.You will not enjoy this.You have been granted the privileged of showing me what reporters Obama prosecuted. Go.Obama prosecuted reporters. More than all other Presidents combined.You seem to have a vivid imagination. A few clowns do not make an entire board. Your appeal to popularity is another in a long line of your logical fallacies.The ONLY one doing the ignoring is you clown,the entire board has seen that as well,not just me,you have this arrogant attitude your right and everybody else is wrong so everybody here is laughing at your stupidity and obvious bias on the dems how you cowardly ignore their corruption,as someone said so well to you earlier,had that been Obama you would not be saying HE owardly ran off and lied,you would be cheering him like the obvious biased non objective democrat lover you sadly are.How can you ignore something someone never presented? If you make a claim or support a claim then youre a clown if you cant prove it. Like you.Why do you can ignore it sense it proves you wrong.? That would be a waste of time on you as we both know so why should he bother with a clown like you.lolYou have to prove to me you are worth proving wrong. Please post where Clinton was convicted of raping anyone. Anyone at all.prove me wrong and post your proof,,,Of course you did clown. Here are your words.I didnt side with him,,,just wanted to see your proof,,,Take a position and provide your proof since the side you support made the first claim.I never made a claim,,,just want to see your proof,,,I noticed that you have failed to provide your proof. Drumpf would be proud of you for running away.so you dont have proof,,,as expected,,,Nope. The first claim made was that Clinton raped someone. If youre going to piggyback on someone elses conversation you have to adhere to side you are supporting.you first,,,it is your claim after all,,,So show us the proof Clinton raped anyone and I will show the proof Drumpf raped a 13 yr old.only in your racist mind,,,Youre just mad because you can't answer my question about Clinton. So if your logic is that Clinton raped someone then it follows that Drumpf raped a 13 yr old. Your move.Well Drumpf raped a 13yr old. When did Clinton rape anyone?Would it be more manly to grab her by the pussy?He’s such a pussy and a whiny little bitch.
what is he supposed to do with a woman who won't shut up? go up and slap her? would that be manly?
Better than doing a Clinton and raping her
You're making shit up again
" only in your racist mind,,, "
Obama would have never pulled a stunt like that retarded dumpster fire Drumpf pulled with the reporter. So "if" could mean anything.
For example. If a cow had balls it would be a bull.
Now you get to explain why Trump not kissing a rude reporter's ass is worse than Obama prosecuting them.
In 2013, the Obama Justice Department labeled then-Fox News reporter James Rosen a “criminal co-conspirator” under the Espionage Act of 1917. And all because the reporter used a State Department contractor as a source for a story. Rosen was also labeled a “flight risk.”
The Justice Department seized the records of at least five phone lines connected to Fox News.
Obama’s Justice Department also secretly obtained Fox News journalist James Rosen’s phone records and tracked his arrivals and departures at the State Department through his security-badge use. The federal law enforcement agency even seized the phone records of Rosen’s parents. The FBI also got a warrant to search Rosen’s emails from 2010.
In 2013 the Obama administration obtained the records of 20 Associated Press office phone lines and reporters’ home and cell phones, seizing them without any notice whatsoever, compromising many sources totally unrelated to an investigation about a foiled al-Qaida terrorist plot. Federal investigators even collected data on calls made by AP reporters in the House of Representatives press gallery.
AP called the seizure a “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into its news-gathering activities, betraying information about its operations “that the government has no conceivable right to know.”
“The Obama administration,” The New York Times editorial board wrote at the time, “has moved beyond protecting government secrets to threatening fundamental freedoms of the press to gather news.”
You should probably stop now.