Watch live & discuss: Jan6 hearing about Trump's "connections" to white supremacist Oath Keepers & Proud Boys who wrecked Congress on that fateful day

[Correll]

Please cite who you are referring to and provide links to what they said. I am unaware of them.

Meanwhile. besides the U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol having provided a venue for many conservative Republicans to provide sworn testimony before the nation, subpoenaed Trump toadies have refused to come clean under oath.

Prominent conservatives rebut Trump’s election falsehoods
View attachment 670539​

Your denial of the "make an example out of them" is you showing yourself to be full of shit.

 

[Winco]

You're the ass hat clown who just said Trump can have a defense if he does it your way, other than that, you're sticking with blowing the Democrats for not allowing him to have any defense at all.

Ok, your chance.
Explain just exactly HOW and in What Setting you would suggest for trumps defense.
What exactly would you like the Democrats to do which will allow him to defend himself?

Here's your chance........ the floor is yours.
Go......

 

[kaz]

Ok, your chance.
Explain just exactly HOW and in What Setting you would suggest for trumps defense

I would propose that the Trump defense team would make that determination. Here's how you know I think that. It's what I said. Stupid just follows you around like a hen to its mother

What exactly would you like the Democrats to do which will allow him to defend himself?

Democrats pick their team, Republicans pick theirs, then the Trump team determines theirs since this is a witch hunt directed at Trump rather than any sort of investigation or fact gathering.

I'm looking forward to the Hunter trials in 2023, what about you?

Here's your chance........ the floor is yours.
Go......

LOL, that's Democrat stupid. Democrat stupid is sort of like steak to beef. You're the king of stupid. Congressional hearings always worked that way until the Democrats in 2022. You not only don't know that, but you don't even remember how it was done all through US history. Stupid follows you around like, well, you know ...

 

[Winco]

I would propose that the Trump defense team would make that determination. Here's how you know I think that. It's what I said. Stupid just follows you around like a hen to its mother

You know, I'm just trying to give you a chance to present 'how the (D) should proceed, and what would be fair to you.'

Yet all you have is insults. You used 'stupid' 4 times in your word salad. Bravo.

I'm looking forward to the Hunter trials in 2023, what about you?

Why is Hunter such a big concern to you.
He's a pathetic loser, much like Don Jr. the cokehead.
You don't see me crying about Don Jr and him stealing money from Cancer Children.
Prosecute Hunter if the facts are there. I don't Care.

 

[kaz]

You know, I'm just trying to give you a chance to present 'how the (D) should proceed, and what would be fair to you.'

Yet all you have is insults. You used 'stupid' 4 times in your word salad. Bravo.

Yes, the sham Democrat trial is designed for stupid people and racists. For you, that's 2 for 2!

Why is Hunter such a big concern to you.

Strawman, racist

He's a pathetic loser, much like Don Jr. the cokehead.
You don't see me crying about Don Jr and him stealing money from Cancer Children.
Prosecute Hunter if the facts are there. I don't Care.

Biden did pick a VP to protect his presidency well. We go after him for his corruption and get rid of old doddering Joe and we get Kamala

 

[schmidlap]

Your denial of the "make an example out of them" is you showing yourself to be full of shit.

Your being unable to back up your bluster with credible documentation does not surprise me.

Thursday's "What did the Cry Baby Loser do during the 187 minutes his goons raged through the Capitol?" prime time special promises to be a doozy! (It will feature even more Republican insider witnesses.)

Hold the ketchup!

 

[j-mac]

Your being unable to back up your bluster with credible documentation does not surprise me.

Thursday's "What did the Cry Baby Loser do during the 187 minutes his goons raged through the Capitol?" prime time special promises to be a doozy! (It will feature even more Republican insider witnesses.)

Hold the ketchup!

You mean more cherry picked, highly produced, info porn for Democrats don't you?

 

[schmidlap]

You mean more cherry picked, highly produced, info porn for Democrats don't you?

The cult's weird worshipers are seeing their dogma being destroyed by the sworn testimony of one Republican of integrity after another, and they are enraged by it.

DC police confirm accounts of Trump fight in limo on Jan. 6

Cipollone corroborated virtually everything from Hutchinson​

This coming Thursday, the sordid accounts of what the Cry Baby Loser did during the 187 minutes his goons were savaging the Capitol will only intensify their hysterics.

Meanwhile, their master blows gas on propaganda outlets as he refuses to testify under oath and orders his lickspittles not to come clean either.

 

[j-mac]

The cult's weird worshipers are seeing their dogma being destroyed by the sworn testimony of one Republican of integrity after another, and they are enraged by it.



This coming Thursday, the sordid accounts of what the Cry Baby Loser did during the 187 minutes his goons were savaging the Capitol will only intensify their hysterics.

Meanwhile, their master blows gas on propaganda outlets as he refuses to testify under oath and orders his lickspittles not to come clean either.

Well, that's rich isn't it? the only Republican's you praise are ones that have provided your propaganda show with material to use....

What would make anyone believe that this committee is on the up and up? bias I suspect.

 

[schmidlap]

Well, that's rich isn't it? the only Republican's you praise are ones that have provided your propaganda show with material to use....

What would make anyone believe that this committee is on the up and up? bias I suspect.

I commend Republicans who have had the courage to testify under oath, and regret that others fear and defy subpoenas requesting that they do likewise.

Your cult's veneration prevents it from acknowledging the moral disparity.

 

[j-mac]

I commend Republicans who have had the courage to testify under oath, and regret that others fear and defy subpoenas requesting that they do likewise.

Your cult's veneration prevents it from acknowledging the moral disparity.

Moral? Good grief, nothing you post has anything to do with morality....

 

[Chillicothe]

What would make anyone believe that this committee is on the up and up?

Well, you be your own judge, poster j-mac, but for me......I've noted how the Committee has mostly relied upon long time loyal Republicans. Not a few of which worked directly for Don Trump, or in the case Hutchinson was a 'special assistant to the President', in addition to reporting directly to Mark Meadows And notably, her office was just steps from the Oval.

If the Committee was not on the "up and up".....they would have brought in a passel of Dems who had axes to grind. Instead, they have provided sober-sided long established and credentialed Republican operatives or supporters.


Also, lending credibility to them is that witnesses are corroborating other's testimony. In short, the testimony is consistent and validating other testimonies.

Also, lending credibility in my narrow parochial view is that this Committee, made up of Republicans and Democrats, has been markedly restrained --for a televised Congressional hearing -- in their opinionizing and side-bars. These folks seem to be a pretty conservative group of investigators. And are projecting an air of 'just-the-fact-Ma'am'.

I like that. It inspires confidence that these folks truly want to get to the bottom of things.

 

[j-mac]

Well, you be your own judge, poster j-mac, but for me......I've noted how the Committee has mostly relied upon long time loyal Republicans. Not a few of which worked directly for Don Trump, or in the case Hutchinson was a 'special assistant to the President', in addition to reporting directly to Mark Meadows And notably, her office was just steps from the Oval.

If the Committee was not on the "up and up".....they would have brought in a passel of Dems who had axes to grind. Instead, they have provided sober-sided long established and credentialed Republican operatives or supporters.


Also, lending credibility to them is that witnesses are corroborating other's testimony. In short, the testimony is consistent and validating other testimonies.

Also, lending credibility in my narrow parochial view is that this Committee, made up of Republicans and Democrats, has been markedly restrained --for a televised Congressional hearing -- in their opinionizing and side-bars. These folks seem to be a pretty conservative group of investigators. And are projecting an air of 'just-the-fact-Ma'am'.

I like that. It inspires confidence that these folks truly want to get to the bottom of things.

Surely you jest…

 

[schmidlap]

Moral? Good grief, nothing you post has anything to do with morality....

Coming from the cult, that's a testimonial that makes me blush.

 

[scruffy]

The cult's weird worshipers are seeing their dogma being destroyed by the sworn testimony of one Republican of integrity after another, and they are enraged by it.

You sir, are a complete ******* idiot.

This coming Thursday, the sordid accounts of what the Cry Baby Loser did during the 187 minutes his goons were savaging the Capitol will only intensify their hysterics.

Right. Looks to me like you're the hysterical one.

Trump Trump Trump

Russia Russia Russia

J6 J6 J6

SSDD

Meanwhile, their master blows gas on propaganda outlets as he refuses to testify under oath and orders his lickspittles not to come clean either.

Now you're a dumbass leftard with shit for brains.

ZERO cooperation with the Stalinist pigs.

Legal or not, elected or not, they're leaving town.

Empty handed

 

[j-mac]

Coming from the cult, that's a testimonial that makes me blush.

Yeah, bite me....

 

[Chillicothe]

From post #252:

"I've noted how the Committee has mostly relied upon long time loyal Republicans. Not a few of which worked directly for Don Trump, or in the case Hutchinson was a 'special assistant to the President', in addition to reporting directly to Mark Meadows. And notably, her office was just steps from the Oval.
If the Committee was not on the "up and up".....they would have brought in a passel of Dems who had axes to grind. Instead, they have provided sober-sided long established and credentialed Republican operatives or supporters."


In response (post #253):

"Surely you jest…"

Actually, no.

 

[scruffy]

Actually, no.

The righties are going to steamroll over the Stalinists, EXACTLY LIKE the Democrats steamrolled over Trump. And I'll help them.

Because Stalinism is absolutely unacceptable. It will not be tolerated.

What the Stalin Committee is doing is unethical, it's SO unethical it's downright un-American. It is in fact, unconscionable and thoroughly disgusting.

So, Mr. Internet Poster "Chillicothe", it's time for me to leave now, so I can go get something else done. They're giving me a new job description.

It's been loads of fun around here. I'll stick around for a couple more days just to annoy y'all. But after that ...

Political belief trees are super interesting. In religion they're easy to understand, they usually start with a simple assumption like "God exists" and the rest of the logic spins down from that.

In politics though, you need a computer. Really. The belief trees are like jigsaw puzzles, they're loads of fun.

 

[schmidlap]

You sir, are a complete ******* idiot.




Right. Looks to me like you're the hysterical one.

Trump Trump Trump

Russia Russia Russia

J6 J6 J6

SSDD





Now you're a dumbass leftard with shit for brains.

ZERO cooperation with the Stalinist pigs.

Legal or not, elected or not, they're leaving town.

Empty handed

You lash out irrationally because you suspect that alleging a vast conspiracy in which all the conservative Republican officeholders and Trump regime insiders who provided damning testimony under oath are also complicit is far too silly - as silly as an airy-fairy, stolen "Landslide!" that has yet to produce a single suspect, and concerning which many assured him was

"BULLSHIT!"​

You're right. It is far too silly to contrive and wage a fatwa against so many reputable folks.

 

[j-mac]

From post #252:

"I've noted how the Committee has mostly relied upon long time loyal Republicans. Not a few of which worked directly for Don Trump, or in the case Hutchinson was a 'special assistant to the President', in addition to reporting directly to Mark Meadows. And notably, her office was just steps from the Oval.
If the Committee was not on the "up and up".....they would have brought in a passel of Dems who had axes to grind. Instead, they have provided sober-sided long established and credentialed Republican operatives or supporters."


In response (post #253):



Actually, no.

Ok then…