Watch Before The Flood Here -- National Geographic (FULL MOVIE)

[Boss]

No, it's not Science. It is Science illiteracy. Check out who the biggest funders of your movement are... they are all Socialists. They have put together a very impressive database of propaganda based on erroneous data that has been exposed as fraudulent and totally debunked. They take a very simple-minded observation that man's industrial activities are causing a very slight effect on climate and they blow that up into this extremist view that only government can stop the impending doom that will certainly befall mankind if action isn't taken.

The actual degree that man's activities effect the climate are minuscule at best. Natural phenomenon, as I said, creates more effect on the climate than everything man has done over the last 100k years or more. In a single year, the activity of the Sun causes more climate change than man has caused his entire existence. And the government certainly can't do anything to prevent that.

 

[skookerasbil]

No, it's not Science. It is Science illiteracy. Check out who the biggest funders of your movement are... they are all Socialists. They have put together a very impressive database of propaganda based on erroneous data that has been exposed as fraudulent and totally debunked. They take a very simple-minded observation that man's industrial activities are causing a very slight effect on climate and they blow that up into this extremist view that only government can stop the impending doom that will certainly befall mankind if action isn't taken.

The actual degree that man's activities effect the climate are minuscule at best. Natural phenomenon, as I said, creates more effect on the climate than everything man has done over the last 100k years or more. In a single year, the activity of the Sun causes more climate change than man has caused his entire existence. And the government certainly can't do anything to prevent that.

yep......these fascists are ghey........Soros et. al.

 

[Crick]

Why do you misspell gay?

 

[Old Rocks]

SSDD, I have taken Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Geology in college. I do not depend on people like Decaprio or Gore for my information. But I do applaud their efforts to put the findings of the scientists in layman's terms.

However, I do understand that people like you are too willfully ignorant to even attempt to understand what these people are showing you. Those that are willfully ignorant are beneath contempt.

I noticed you didn't say you had a degree in any of them. The "intro to science X" courses that Lib Arts people take do not an expert make.

No, stupid ass, I have only taken one 100 science course in my life. All were the standard three quarter 200 courses. And the reason that I do not have a degree as of yet, is that for the last four years I have been taking courses as my work schedule allowed.

And the major is Geology, not exactly a Lib Arts major. Then again, what was your major? Have you ever taken any science courses?

 

[Old Rocks]

Anyone actually watch this? The news is bad unless we change things, but the presentation and actual footage is extraordinary.

Look... you fucking moron... you're never going to change the climate. If you wiped every human off the face of the planet, it would still get warmer and cooler, just as it has for 4 billion years. Sometimes, it gets very warm or very cool.... some species don't survive but the planet continues to survive. That's just nature and nothing you can do will ever change it.

This whole entire debacle has been exposed as the fraud it is. It's perpetrated by Socialists who need a mechanism by which to control Capitalists. That is ALL this is about. It continues to thrive on sheer stupidity and gullibility of people who simply don't comprehend nature. You exploit the illiteracy and ignorance of the population to perpetrate this insanity which has no validity whatsoever.

Go outside and look up in the sky. You see that great big yellow ball? That's the Sun. The Sun has FAR more to do with the climate changing than humans ever could have. Natural phenomenon like volcanoes and earthquakes have more effect on the climate than humans have had in 100k years.

Now, I know you won't listen to me because you people never do. You've been brainwashed by your liberal masters that it's up to you to go out there and save the planet. You believe that it's your obligation to inform us and educate us because we just don't get it. We're killing the planet and we just don't care... and it's all up to you to care. If you don't keep this going, you're failing as a human being. That's a helluva burden for you to bear. I appreciate your compassion but what you are participating in will ultimately kill people. Yes.. I said it will KILL people.

Restrictions sought by the Warmer movement will mean less energy available for third world countries who desperately need it to feed their people. Socialists don't care if people die... they've killed over 150 million trying to implement their agenda. Whether you realize this or not, you are actively participating in that and you're responsible.

One only has to read this ranting screed to realize how fucking stupid Boss is. Proud enough to bust his buttons of his willful ignorance. Gotta love how these 'Conservatives' flaunt their stupidity.

Just because every Scientific Society, every Academy of Science, and every major University in the world disagrees with them is only a sign of how vast the conspiracy is. LOL Don't forget to buy more tinfoil for your little hats, Boss.

 

[Old Rocks]

No, it's not Science. It is Science illiteracy. Check out who the biggest funders of your movement are... they are all Socialists. They have put together a very impressive database of propaganda based on erroneous data that has been exposed as fraudulent and totally debunked. They take a very simple-minded observation that man's industrial activities are causing a very slight effect on climate and they blow that up into this extremist view that only government can stop the impending doom that will certainly befall mankind if action isn't taken.

The actual degree that man's activities effect the climate are minuscule at best. Natural phenomenon, as I said, creates more effect on the climate than everything man has done over the last 100k years or more. In a single year, the activity of the Sun causes more climate change than man has caused his entire existence. And the government certainly can't do anything to prevent that.

All flap yap without a single credible source to back up anything that you claim.

Damn, I did not realize that Joseph Fourier, John Tyndall, and Svante Arrhenius were socialists. Were Callender and Sues? You flap yappers just think that calling anything socialist or communist absolutely wins you any debate. What it does is expose the vast ignorance that you operate from.

 

[Crick]

I thought the biggest funder was the US government.

 

[Boss]

Just because every Scientific Society, every Academy of Science, and every major University in the world disagrees with them ...

And that's yet another LIE you people spread. This "97% of Scientists" consensus you claim is completely bogus. Only 0.3% of climate scientists actually say that humans are significant factors in climate change. But just the argumentative point itself is a testament to your own ignorance of the scientific method... Science is not determined by popularity.

 

[Old Rocks]

Now look, silly ass liar Boss, I can back up what I say, you cannot back up your silly flap yap.

http://sciencepolicy.agu.org/files/2013/07/AGU-Climate-Change-Position-Statement_August-2013.pdf

Human‐Induced Climate Change Requires Urgent Action

Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes. Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat‐trapping greenhouse gases have increased sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase. Human‐caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate system for millennia. Extensive, independent observations confirm the reality of global warming. These observations show large‐scale increases in air and sea temperatures, sea level, and atmospheric water vapor; they document decreases in the extent of mountain glaciers, snow cover, permafrost, and Arctic sea ice. These changes are broadly consistent with long‐ understood physics and predictions of how the climate system is expected to respond to human‐caused increases in greenhouse gases. The changes are inconsistent with explanations of climate change that rely on known natural influences.

The American Geophysical Union has more climate scientists in it than any other scientific society in the world.

 

[Old Rocks]

The Geological Society of America - Position Statement on Climate Change

Climate Change
Adopted in October 2006; revised April 2010; March 2013; April 2015

Position Statement
Decades of scientific research have shown that climate can change from both natural and anthropogenic causes. The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2011), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2013) and the U.S. Global Change Research Program (Melillo et al., 2014) that global climate has warmed in response to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases. The concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are now higher than they have been for many thousands of years. Human activities (mainly greenhouse-gas emissions) are the dominant cause of the rapid warming since the middle 1900s (IPCC, 2013). If the upward trend in greenhouse-gas concentrations continues, the projected global climate change by the end of the twenty-first century will result in significant impacts on humans and other species. The tangible effects of climate change are already occurring. Addressing the challenges posed by climate change will require a combination of adaptation to the changes that are likely to occur and global reductions of CO2 emissions from anthropogenic sources.

Purpose
This position statement (1) summarizes the scientific basis for the conclusion that human activities are the primary cause of recent global warming; (2) describes the significant effects on humans and ecosystems as greenhouse-gas concentrations and global climate reach projected levels; and (3) provides information for policy decisions guiding mitigation and adaptation strategies designed to address the current and future impacts of anthropogenic warming.

The Geological Society of America.

 

[Old Rocks]

https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/policy/publicpolicies/promote/globalclimatechange.html
Global Climate Change
ACS Position Statement

PDF Version

“Careful and comprehensive scientific assessments have clearly demonstrated that the Earth’s climate system is changing in response to growing atmospheric burdens of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and absorbing aerosol particles.” (IPCC, 2007) “Climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for—and in many cases is already affecting—a broad range of human and natural systems.” (NRC, 2010a) “The potential threats are serious and actions are required to mitigate climate change risks and to adapt to deleterious climate change impacts that probably cannot be avoided.” (NRC, 2010b, c)

This statement reviews key probable climate change impacts and recommends actions required to mitigate or adapt to current and anticipated consequences.

The American Chemical Society

 

[SYTFE]

Old Rocks, I noticed you're posting things called "facts." Boss hates those. Just an FYI. He prefers hysterical clickbait from thegatewaypundit and having bloviating blowhards like Rush Limbaugh tell him what he should think.

 

[Old Rocks]

change
Downloads

• Statement
  
  PDF, 413.0kb
  

21 July 2015


The Royal Society is one of 24 of the UK’s Professional and Learned Societies that have endorsed this communiqué on climate change. Together the organisations involved represent a diverse range of expertise from across the sciences, social sciences, arts, humanities, medicine and engineering.

The communiqué states that if we are to have a reasonable chance of limiting global warming in this century to 2°C relative to the pre-industrial period, we must transition to a zero-carbon world by early in the second half of the century. It highlights the risks associated with climate change, as well as the potential responses and opportunities of low-carbon and climate-resilient growth.

https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/Publications/2015/21-07-15-climate-communique.PDF

The scientific evidence is now overwhelming that the climate is warming and that human activity is largely responsible for this change through emissions of greenhouse gases. Governments will meet in Paris in November and December this year to negotiate a legally binding and universal agreement on tackling climate change. Any international policy response to climate change must be rooted in the latest scientific evidence. This indicates that if we are to have a reasonable chance of limiting global warming in this century to 2°C relative to the pre-industrial period, we must transition to a zero-carbon world1 by early in the second half of the century. To achieve this transition, governments should demonstrate leadership by recognising the risks climate change poses, embracing appropriate policy and technological responses, and seizing the opportunities of low-carbon and climate-resilient growth. Risks. Climate change poses risks to people and ecosystems by exacerbating existing economic, environmental, geopolitical, health and societal threats, and generating new ones. These risks increase disproportionately as the temperature increases. Many systems are already at risk from climate change. A rise of 2°C above pre-industrial levels would lead to further increased risk from extreme weather and would place more ecosystems and cultures in significant danger. At or above 4°C, the risks include substantial species extinction, global and regional food insecurity, and fundamental changes to human activities that today are taken for granted.

The Royal Society, the oldest scientific society in the world

 

[Old Rocks]

Old Rocks, I noticed you're posting things called "facts." Boss hates those. Just an FYI. He prefers hysterical clickbait from thegatewaypundit and having bloviating blowhards like Rush Limbaugh tell him what he should think.

Yes, I figured him for one of those fellows that figures an obese junkie on the AM radio knows more than all the scientists in the world. A good many pompous self righteous asses like that on this board.

 

[Old Rocks]

However, I don't post for the Boss's of this world. There are many that just read, and do not post. They need to know that what the Boss's post is pure shit. There is a problem that is upon us right now. The longer we wait to address it, the worse it is going to be for our descendents.

 

[martybegan]

SSDD, I have taken Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Geology in college. I do not depend on people like Decaprio or Gore for my information. But I do applaud their efforts to put the findings of the scientists in layman's terms.

However, I do understand that people like you are too willfully ignorant to even attempt to understand what these people are showing you. Those that are willfully ignorant are beneath contempt.

I noticed you didn't say you had a degree in any of them. The "intro to science X" courses that Lib Arts people take do not an expert make.

No, stupid ass, I have only taken one 100 science course in my life. All were the standard three quarter 200 courses. And the reason that I do not have a degree as of yet, is that for the last four years I have been taking courses as my work schedule allowed.

And the major is Geology, not exactly a Lib Arts major. Then again, what was your major? Have you ever taken any science courses?

I have a Master's degree in Chemical Engineering, rock boy.

 

[jc456]

However, I don't post for the Boss's of this world. There are many that just read, and do not post. They need to know that what the Boss's post is pure shit. There is a problem that is upon us right now. The longer we wait to address it, the worse it is going to be for our descendents.

so how many scientists all signed the statements you posted in your links? Can you quantify that number? Cause you know a statement from an organization does not mean the entire organization agrees with it? right? you know this, right? Right? Why don't you name the actual authors of the statements with their credentials.

BTW, let me take this moment and fking laugh loudly at you. I supposed you wish that I repost Judith Curry's version of the APS statement?

 

[Boss]

Old Rocks, I noticed you're posting things called "facts." Boss hates those. Just an FYI. He prefers hysterical clickbait from thegatewaypundit and having bloviating blowhards like Rush Limbaugh tell him what he should think.

I don't mind facts but all OldRocks posts is propaganda from pro-warmer sources. The International Association of Global Warming and Warmers Untied International aren't exactly "independent observers" here. Reeling off a dozen similar advocacy groups and copying/pasting their predictable pro-warmer nonsense is not science.

It's like I said earlier... the Warmers have a vibrant resource of propaganda websites pushing their hokey trumped-up data and alarmist rhetoric. They've got billions in funding from Socialists who want to see their initiative succeed. And little dumb bunnies like you are helping carry their water.

 

[Crick]

The sites Old Rocks mentions most often here are the national science academies of the world's industrialized nations; every single one of which accepts AGW as valid. They are quite distinctly independent observers and eminently qualified to make such calls.

Bringing up socialists in this debate is a screaming admission that you haven't got jack shit in the way of an argument.

 

[Old Rocks]

SSDD, I have taken Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Geology in college. I do not depend on people like Decaprio or Gore for my information. But I do applaud their efforts to put the findings of the scientists in layman's terms.

However, I do understand that people like you are too willfully ignorant to even attempt to understand what these people are showing you. Those that are willfully ignorant are beneath contempt.

I noticed you didn't say you had a degree in any of them. The "intro to science X" courses that Lib Arts people take do not an expert make.

No, stupid ass, I have only taken one 100 science course in my life. All were the standard three quarter 200 courses. And the reason that I do not have a degree as of yet, is that for the last four years I have been taking courses as my work schedule allowed.

And the major is Geology, not exactly a Lib Arts major. Then again, what was your major? Have you ever taken any science courses?

I have a Master's degree in Chemical Engineering, rock boy.

OK, then you disagree with the American Chemical Societies assessment of global warming? And what is your explanation of the present warming that we are experiancing?