Wasserman Scultz can't tell the Difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat!

[francoHFW]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

Ok I ask you what's the difference between a dem and a demt socialist ??? do you know???

I already posted my response to that earlier in the thread, bub. Try reading.

well sweetie I don't feel like going through every post all 37 pages to find out your answer ... I get it you don't know ...

And we get it that you're a LAZY GOOD FOR NOTHING LIBERAL.

Funny. One thing for sure. Like all Pub dupes, you always revert to socialists are communist bs.

 

[billyerock1991]

There's a big difference between a socialist state and a social democracy. Big one...

One controls the production of goods, while the other is a hybrid that is elected by the people.

The bigger a government gets the less freedoms the people have.
I don't like being 47th out of 48 of free world countries.
While Canada is number 7.
The Most and Least Free Countries in the World by Freedom House 2014

You idiot, that's #47 ALPHABETICALLY of the best 48 countries lol...

You are the idiot who wants less freedom and more government.
You did not check out the info at the link.
So be it - Here are some others.
U.S. drops in state of free press ranking report - NY Daily News
Freedom of press we are 46 out of 180 countries.
Country Rankings World Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom
USA 76.2
Hong Kong 89.6
Canada # 6
USA#12

Freedom lost
Chuck Baldwin -- Freedom Lost
According to the Index of Economic Freedom, which is produced by the Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal, the United States just barely makes it in the top ten, ranked at number nine in the world.

According to Deroy Murdock, "Among the 179 countries examined in the Index, Hong Kong is ranked first, followed by Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Canada, Ireland, and Denmark. These nations all outscored the U.S. across ten categories, including taxes, free trade, regulation, monetary policy, and corruption.

"America barely made the top ten. Bahrain was tenth, with 77.7 points, one decimal point behind America's 77.8 score. Chile reached No. 11 with 77.4, just 0.4 points behind the United States.

"Even worse, with a score below 80, the U.S. is spending its second year as a 'mostly free' economy. As it departed the family of 'free' nations in 2010, it led the 'mostly free' category. Even within this less-than-illustrious group, America now lags behind Ireland and Denmark."

And that's what Reaganism has done to us. We need another 8 years at least of Dem rule to turn this corrupt, pander to the rich ship around. see sig

First define socialism, then it's a fair question. Bernie says he's a social democrat, or a democratic socialist. Of course the rest of the world knows that's the only kind. The hater dupe replies, "Oh so you're a communist." GD functional morons lol...

Pandering to the rich is why Hong Kong is 89.6 and we are 76.2
The more rich you have the more tax dollars are paid.
Top 10 Percent of Earners Paid 68 Percent of Federal Income Taxes
Top earners were the main target of recent tax increases under President Obama, but the federal income tax system is already highly progressive. The top 10 percent of income earners paid 68 percent of all federal income taxes in 2011 (the latest year available), though they earned 45 percent of all income. The bottom 50 percent paid 3 percent of income taxes, but earned 12 percent of income.

and where did you find this bullshit reasoning???? whirly nut daily newsmax, or some right wing bullshit tax site???? got a source for this nonsense ???

 

[NYcarbineer]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

Ok I ask you what's the difference between a dem and a demt socialist ??? do you know???

I already posted my response to that earlier in the thread, bub. Try reading.

well sweetie I don't feel like going through every post all 37 pages to find out your answer ... I get it you don't know ...

Her tell that she's been had is when she plays the 'bub' card.

 

[billyerock1991]

The bigger a government gets the less freedoms the people have.
I don't like being 47th out of 48 of free world countries.
While Canada is number 7.
The Most and Least Free Countries in the World by Freedom House 2014

You idiot, that's #47 ALPHABETICALLY of the best 48 countries lol...

You are the idiot who wants less freedom and more government.
You did not check out the info at the link.
So be it - Here are some others.
U.S. drops in state of free press ranking report - NY Daily News
Freedom of press we are 46 out of 180 countries.
Country Rankings World Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom
USA 76.2
Hong Kong 89.6
Canada # 6
USA#12

Freedom lost
Chuck Baldwin -- Freedom Lost
According to the Index of Economic Freedom, which is produced by the Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal, the United States just barely makes it in the top ten, ranked at number nine in the world.

According to Deroy Murdock, "Among the 179 countries examined in the Index, Hong Kong is ranked first, followed by Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Canada, Ireland, and Denmark. These nations all outscored the U.S. across ten categories, including taxes, free trade, regulation, monetary policy, and corruption.

"America barely made the top ten. Bahrain was tenth, with 77.7 points, one decimal point behind America's 77.8 score. Chile reached No. 11 with 77.4, just 0.4 points behind the United States.

"Even worse, with a score below 80, the U.S. is spending its second year as a 'mostly free' economy. As it departed the family of 'free' nations in 2010, it led the 'mostly free' category. Even within this less-than-illustrious group, America now lags behind Ireland and Denmark."

And that's what Reaganism has done to us. We need another 8 years at least of Dem rule to turn this corrupt, pander to the rich ship around. see sig

First define socialism, then it's a fair question. Bernie says he's a social democrat, or a democratic socialist. Of course the rest of the world knows that's the only kind. The hater dupe replies, "Oh so you're a communist." GD functional morons lol...

At least I did not call you an idiot when you misread a news headline at one time not too long ago.
We all make mistakes and we all misread things here at one time or another.

I said you were pleasant. See sig last line.

Actually, I think I missed the second half of an article, where after giving the TRUE stats on our basically flat and unfair tax system, CNBC had to add BS from some RW site to keep "balance". RW sites like Heritage and WSJ editorial board under Murdoch (and HUNDREDS of others) patently LIE in the headlines, as well as in the main bodies (It's almost impossible to find the truth after 15 google pages of lockstep RW websites on so many bs RW stories that real news never even covers). You believe a HUGE pile of Pubcrappe at this point. Dems NOT. See sig before last line.

There's a big difference between a socialist state and a social democracy. Big one...

One controls the production of goods, while the other is a hybrid that is elected by the people.

what has been happening coming from the right their have been right wing sources who have been loading up on goodle, one after another false statements on what have been right wing points of view .making it hard for left wing sources to be able to look up the actual truth these days ... As time has gone on I seen this happen. myself ... Example: the dictionary defined having sex as sexual relations, or sexual intercourse .... I used the definition many times in a debate over clinton when he said he didn't have sexual relations with that woman ... oral sex isn't sexual relations was my point...as sure as shit they changed the definition to oral sex as sexual relation a couple years later to justify their means... its amazes me how crooked republicans are and they feel well that's just fine if we win our point of view

 

[billyerock1991]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

Ok I ask you what's the difference between a dem and a demt socialist ??? do you know???

I already posted my response to that earlier in the thread, bub. Try reading.

well sweetie I don't feel like going through every post all 37 pages to find out your answer ... I get it you don't know ...

Her tell that she's been had is when she plays the 'bub' card.

ain't that the truth

 

[billyerock1991]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

Ok I ask you what's the difference between a dem and a demt socialist ??? do you know???

I already posted my response to that earlier in the thread, bub. Try reading.

well sweetie I don't feel like going through every post all 37 pages to find out your answer ... I get it you don't know ...

I get it that you are too lazy to read.

no i not too lazy to read .. to busy to look at all thirty seven pages of 15 post or more per page to look up what she said ... the facts are she probably got hammered from the left over her definition and was too afraid to print it again ... I know I have reprinted my statemes when question so i would say the lazy one his her

 

[Papageorgio]

Possibly because they have become synonymous...

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

You are wrong, Democrats are to the left of Socialists.

 

[Stephanie]

She can't find a difference because there ISN'T one.

on top of the fact she's one of many stupid women they have elected to that party

 

[billyerock1991]

She can't find a difference because there ISN'T one.

on top of the fact she's one of many stupid women they have elected to that party

You idiot, that's #47 ALPHABETICALLY of the best 48 countries lol...

You are the idiot who wants less freedom and more government.
You did not check out the info at the link.
So be it - Here are some others.
U.S. drops in state of free press ranking report - NY Daily News
Freedom of press we are 46 out of 180 countries.
Country Rankings World Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom
USA 76.2
Hong Kong 89.6
Canada # 6
USA#12

Freedom lost
Chuck Baldwin -- Freedom Lost
According to the Index of Economic Freedom, which is produced by the Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal, the United States just barely makes it in the top ten, ranked at number nine in the world.

According to Deroy Murdock, "Among the 179 countries examined in the Index, Hong Kong is ranked first, followed by Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Canada, Ireland, and Denmark. These nations all outscored the U.S. across ten categories, including taxes, free trade, regulation, monetary policy, and corruption.

"America barely made the top ten. Bahrain was tenth, with 77.7 points, one decimal point behind America's 77.8 score. Chile reached No. 11 with 77.4, just 0.4 points behind the United States.

"Even worse, with a score below 80, the U.S. is spending its second year as a 'mostly free' economy. As it departed the family of 'free' nations in 2010, it led the 'mostly free' category. Even within this less-than-illustrious group, America now lags behind Ireland and Denmark."

And that's what Reaganism has done to us. We need another 8 years at least of Dem rule to turn this corrupt, pander to the rich ship around. see sig

First define socialism, then it's a fair question. Bernie says he's a social democrat, or a democratic socialist. Of course the rest of the world knows that's the only kind. The hater dupe replies, "Oh so you're a communist." GD functional morons lol...

At least I did not call you an idiot when you misread a news headline at one time not too long ago.
We all make mistakes and we all misread things here at one time or another.

I said you were pleasant. See sig last line.

Actually, I think I missed the second half of an article, where after giving the TRUE stats on our basically flat and unfair tax system, CNBC had to add BS from some RW site to keep "balance". RW sites like Heritage and WSJ editorial board under Murdoch (and HUNDREDS of others) patently LIE in the headlines, as well as in the main bodies (It's almost impossible to find the truth after 15 google pages of lockstep RW websites on so many bs RW stories that real news never even covers). You believe a HUGE pile of Pubcrappe at this point. Dems NOT. See sig before last line.

what has been happening coming from the right their have been right wing sources who have been loading up on goodle, one after another false statements on what have been right wing points of view .making it hard for left wing sources to be able to look up the actual truth these days ... As time has gone on I seen this happen. myself ... Example: the dictionary defined having sex as sexual relations, or sexual intercourse .... I used the definition many times in a debate over clinton when he said he didn't have sexual relations with that woman ... oral sex isn't sexual relations was my point...as sure as shit they changed the definition to oral sex as sexual relation a couple years later to justify their means... its amazes me how crooked republicans are and they feel well that's just fine if we win our point of view

 

[billyerock1991]

She can't find a difference because there ISN'T one.

on top of the fact she's one of many stupid women they have elected to that party

the question was asked to you ... the fact that you couldn't tell us the definitions, tells us that you're one of the many stupid women who can't define it

 

[LeftofLeft]

Wasserman Schultz also did not want to answer the question. She did not want to make a distinction. Many Democrats want Socialism but are afraid to sell it to the American People....seems Democrats would rather transform Americans vs. Enlightening them.

 

[Stephanie]

add Wasserman what's her name, Lizzy the liar, and well pretty much all the elected women in that party. nothing comes from them but trash talk. almost worse than the men in it

 

[boedicca]

This is HILLARIOUS! Chris Matthews is obviously a shill for HILLARY!, but it is quite amusing to see him nail Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She will not answer his question to tell the difference between being a Socialist and a Democrat.

Ok I ask you what's the difference between a dem and a demt socialist ??? do you know???

I already posted my response to that earlier in the thread, bub. Try reading.

well sweetie I don't feel like going through every post all 37 pages to find out your answer ... I get it you don't know ...

I get it that you are too lazy to read.

no i not too lazy to read .. to busy to look at all thirty seven pages of 15 post or more per page to look up what she said ... the facts are she probably got hammered from the left over her definition and was too afraid to print it again ... I know I have reprinted my statemes when question so i would say the lazy one his her

If you are so incurious that you aren't going to bother to read, I'm not going to repeat myself.

That's your problem; not mine.

 

[boedicca]

She can't find a difference because there ISN'T one.

on top of the fact she's one of many stupid women they have elected to that party

There used to be a difference when Liberalism was Classical Liberalism. Now that it is Progressivism, there is none.

 

[boedicca]

add Wasserman what's her name, Lizzy the liar, and well pretty much all the elected women in that party. nothing comes from them but trash talk. almost worse than the men in it

Now wonder the Progs hate humanity given this sample.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Soros has nothing to do with MSNBC, hater dupe. You hate Soros only because you're brainwashed with bs. I was talking about what's wrong with it. Unlike Foxbots, we have MANY different channels and papers we can use...

I hate Soros because he is a Hitler level scumbag - the same reason you love him. Franco hater dupe.

Soros owns the democratic party. If the hate station MSNBC is about to fold - because no one other than insane fools watch it, then it is up to him to save it. He has stolen billions, and used his democrat party to steal billions more - he can afford it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Wasserman Schultz also did not want to answer the question. She did not want to make a distinction. Many Democrats want Socialism but are afraid to sell it to the American People....seems Democrats would rather transform Americans vs. Enlightening them.

Democrats seek a centrally planned and managed economy. Many quibble that since they don't openly advocate the direct ownership of the means of production, they aren't really socialists. This is of course nonsense, Marx directly described the type of command and control economy promoted by the Obama left as socialism, and the prelude to state ownership. democrats seek an authoritarian state where edicts from rulers dictate the lives of subjects.

 

[francoHFW]

Soros has nothing to do with MSNBC, hater dupe. You hate Soros only because you're brainwashed with bs. I was talking about what's wrong with it. Unlike Foxbots, we have MANY different channels and papers we can use...

I hate Soros because he is a Hitler level scumbag - the same reason you love him. Franco hater dupe.

Soros owns the democratic party. If the hate station MSNBC is about to fold - because no one other than insane fools watch it, then it is up to him to save it. He has stolen billions, and used his democrat party to steal billions more - he can afford it.

Too bad you have nothing but ridiculous propaganda aas evidence, hater dupe. He's all charity, democracy support, and fact checking. Change the channel, fool.

 

[Political Junky]

Since the Democrat folks here are too cowardly to articulate what they believe I will for them.

The Democrat Party today is philosophically attached to the Western European Socialist model. The reason: It provides more cover than the old Soviet system. Basically you cripple business in an ocean of regulation and utterly control it behind the scenes via regulation versus directly stealing the means of production.

When business fails you blame business versus Government. Neat....right?

The other agenda is "social justice," which means stealing from one group to buy votes with another group, with the Government of course always getting to decide who the winners and losers are.

I think that sums it up.

Most Cons can't tell the difference either.

 

[Political Junky]

Liberals today are Socialists. That's not a smear; it's an analysis or observation. Many Republicans embrace Socialism. Debates would be a lot more honest if you embraced who you truly are

Bernie Sanders is honest.

What's overlooked is that most of Sanders' 'socialist' positions are not 'liberal' positions, they are mainstream American positions.

Which is why he draws the largest crowds wherever he speaks.