Washington Post: Some conservatives see “Twitterfiles” as a dud. “It’s not really the smoking gun we’d hoped for,”

[Billiejeens]

LOL WaPo.

Twitter employees lied to the FEC.

The DNC and Biden team colluded with Twitter to ban accounts and have posts deleted.

Infringing on people’s civil rights has consequences.

Maybe
The Cult seems pretty adept at circling the wagons and protecting each other no matter how severe the crimes are.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yep. And no one should be surprised. The FBI is always going to be monitoring for corrupt foreign influence into our campaigns.

That’s a normal function of federal law enforcement.

You mean like the New York Post?

The FBI is the corrupt influence into our campaigns. The FBI is nothing but the STASI for the corrupt democrat Reich.

 

[Billiejeens]

You mean like the New York Post?

The FBI is the corrupt influence into our campaigns. The FBI is nothing but the STASI for the corrupt democrat Reich.

That one is unreachable
It doesn't have the requisite intelligence to comprehend issues outside of the Cult approved positions, or the desire to do so.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It is? Can you cite the law? I am not being critical, I just have not heard of that being illegal as its a common way to get around bribery charges. Note we're not talking bribery of a federal official because that would have to show funds flows to the official.

{
(b)Whoever—
(1)directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—
(A)
to influence any official act; or
(B)
to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or
(C)
to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;}

18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses

www.law.cornell.edu

Of course it's illegal.

But I agree that democrats are not subject to this or any law.

 

[Marener]

You mean like the New York Post?

The FBI is the corrupt influence into our campaigns. The FBI is nothing but the STASI for the corrupt democrat Reich.

The FBI didn’t say anything about the NY Post.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The FBI provides information to social media companies and let’s them make their own decisions.

They did not tell anyone to suppress the laptop story.

 

[Marener]

Reduced to lying - how pathetic.


Fascism is the precept that all power


State above all - the central government is the absolute ruler of all things - which is EXACTLY the same premise of the democrat party.

Hitler instantly invaded Austria - hardly a "nationalist" move. He was an expansionist globalist, seeking to rule the world along with Italy and Japan.

Not that "nationalism" is a negative - in fact the belief in a sovereign nation with secure borders is the foundation of the Constitution that you wage war to end.

The one world dictatorship that the democrat Reich seeks is no different than the world power Hitler sought.

Are you implying Hitler wasn’t nationalist?

FFS.

Yes, he was expansionist because he wanted to take the land of Central Europe, wipe lesser people off the map and give the land to Germans to prosper, it was called lebensraum. It was extremely nationalist. It was a “Germany first” policy.

Conservatives hate multiculturalism and multinationalism he are constantly attacking the left for embracing it.

Multiculturalism and multinationalism is about as opposite fascism you can get.

 

[westwall]

This Washington Post article on “Twittergate” is very good:

Disappointed conservatives:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/12/03/elon-musk-twitter-files/

 

[Zincwarrior]

{
(b)Whoever—
(1)directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—
(A)
to influence any official act; or
(B)
to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or
(C)
to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;}

18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses

www.law.cornell.edu

Of course it's illegal.

But I agree that democrats are not subject to this or any law.

Thats not applicable as I posted:
Is Hunter Biden a public official? No.
Is there legally admissible evidence of something of value flowing to Biden? No.
Is there legally admissible evidence of something of value to a person selected by Biden, with intent? No.

Get legally admissible evidence and I am behind you 100%.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The FBI didn’t say anything about the NY Post.

DUDE - the whole affair is about censoring the the press, banning the New York Post from posting on Twitter to limit the exposure of the Hunter Laptop facts (remember, two weeks ago you were blatantly lying that the laptop was fake)

The FBI was DIRECLY infringing on freedom of the press in order to corrupt and influence the 2020 election.

 

[Marener]

DUDE - the whole affair is about censoring the the press, banning the New York Post from posting on Twitter to limit the exposure of the Hunter Laptop facts (remember, two weeks ago you were blatantly lying that the laptop was fake)

The FBI was DIRECLY infringing on freedom of the press in order to corrupt and influence the 2020 election.

The FBI did not tell anyone to do anything about the NY Post article.

The emails from Twitter confirm that Twitter did it on their own volition.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Thats not applicable as I posted:

Of course not, democrats are not subject to laws.

Is Hunter Biden a public official? No.

Joe Biden was vice president. Hunter was selling access to the VP and U.S. Policy.

Is there legally admissible evidence of something of value flowing to Biden? No.

Yes - which is why the FBI violated the constitution to try and suppress the laptop.

Days ago, your fellow fascists Faun and Marener lied that the "laptop is fake," though we've known for two years it's legitimate. IF the store owner had not kept a copy of the hard drive backup, the FBI would have destroyed all evidence of this.

Is there legally admissible evidence of something of value to a person selected by Biden, with intent? No.

Nonsense - you're trying to cover for your party.

Hunter AND James Biden made an industry of selling access to "the Big Guy," both as a corrupt senator and VP.

We have proof from the laptop that Quid Pro sold access through his son for 50% of the take.

Get legally admissible evidence and I am behind you 100%.

Joe Biden is a democrat - he isn't subject to laws.

We ALL know that if this were Trump there would be hearings in both houses, a special prosecutor, and articles of impeachment.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The FBI did not tell anyone to do anything about the NY Post article.

The emails from Twitter confirm that Twitter did it on their own volition.

Reduced to lying, how pathetic.

 

[Marener]

Reduced to lying, how pathetic.

You’re uninformed.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Of course not, democrats are not subject to laws.



Joe Biden was vice president. Hunter was selling access to the VP and U.S. Policy.



Yes - which is why the FBI violated the constitution to try and suppress the laptop.

Days ago, your fellow fascists Faun and Marener lied that the "laptop is fake," though we've known for two years it's legitimate. IF the store owner had not kept a copy of the hard drive backup, the FBI would have destroyed all evidence of this.

Nonsense - you're trying to cover for your party.

Hunter AND James Biden made an industry of selling access to "the Big Guy," both as a corrupt senator and VP.

We have proof from the laptop that Quid Pro sold access through his son for 50% of the take.



Joe Biden is a democrat - he isn't subject to laws.

We ALL know that if this were Trump there would be hearings in both houses, a special prosecutor, and articles of impeachment.

If you have legally admissible of that you should take that to the Federal authorities then.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If you have legally admissible of that you should take that to the Federal authorities then.

For what purpose?

democrats are not subject to laws.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Well that must be discouraging for you.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Well that must be discouraging for you.

It is.

What's most discouraging is those like you who are totally cool with it - uber alles democrat.

 

[Zincwarrior]

No its Democrat uber alles! Come on Man!

 

[Uncensored2008]

No its Democrat uber alles! Come on Man!

Uh, no...