Washington Post: Project Veritas itself wrote postal worker's affidavit falsely claiming fraud

[pyetro]

Well well well. Looks like Project Veritas
1) Drafted the initial affidavit by postal worker Richard Hopkins (claiming without proof that USPS higher-ups told him to tamper with ballots)
2) Lied about Hopkins being coerced (WaPo linked to Project Veritas' own audio recording).
3) Said would release a 3-hour recording, but released a 2-hour recording. Hmmmm.
Here's Project Veritas' own-goal audio:

During the recorded interview, however, federal agents repeatedly reminded Hopkins that his cooperation was voluntary, and Hopkins agreed to sign a document stating that he was not coerced.
Asked by an agent whether he had legal representation, Hopkins said Project Veritas had a lawyer on retention “in case there’s anything that happens.” The agent told Hopkins that if he had a personal lawyer, “I would make whatever efforts possible to have that person here.” Hopkins said he didn’t have a lawyer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/postal-worker-hopkins-ballot-pennsylvania/2020/11/11/c9b70eda-2470-11eb-8599-406466ad1b8e_story.html

 

[westwall]

Well well well. Looks like Project Veritas
1) Drafted the initial affidavit by postal worker Richard Hopkins (claiming without proof that USPS higher-ups told him to tamper with ballots)
2) Lied about Hopkins being coerced (WaPo linked to Project Veritas' own audio recording).
3) Said would release a 3-hour recording, but released a 2-hour recording. Hmmmm.
Here's Project Veritas' own-goal audio:

During the recorded interview, however, federal agents repeatedly reminded Hopkins that his cooperation was voluntary, and Hopkins agreed to sign a document stating that he was not coerced.
Asked by an agent whether he had legal representation, Hopkins said Project Veritas had a lawyer on retention “in case there’s anything that happens.” The agent told Hopkins that if he had a personal lawyer, “I would make whatever efforts possible to have that person here.” Hopkins said he didn’t have a lawyer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/postal-worker-hopkins-ballot-pennsylvania/2020/11/11/c9b70eda-2470-11eb-8599-406466ad1b8e_story.html

Oh, so your whole "he recanted" story blew up in your face, so you trot this garbage out.

Here's a simple one for you.

You assholes CHEAT. And you got caught.

Everywhere!

 

[shockedcanadian]

Look at it this way. Project Veritas may have written his affidavit to ensure all of the salacious details were there, they sell dirty laundry.

However, unlike in the past where they would send undercovers in and befriend people, this guy had to have reached out to them. How could they have known about this guy otherwise?

If a man goes to the point of exposing his identity and telling his story, I have to think it's more compelling than "anonymous sources", for instance.

 

[gipper]

It’s rather amusing, since the Bezos Post and it’s predecessor ownership have reported bogus stories for decades. It’s a deep state CIA organ and has been for a long time.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Look at it this way. Project Veritas may have written his affidavit to ensure all of the salacious details were there, they sell dirty laundry.

However, unlike in the past where they would send undercovers in and befriend people, this guy had to have reached out to them. How could they have known about this guy otherwise?

If a man goes to the point of exposing his identity and telling his story, I have to think it's more compelling than "anonymous sources", for instance.

What guy? The one they dressed in a postal carrier outfit?

You make a valid point. I have no evidence one way or another but that would be a bold stretch of reality when they know his assertions can easily be disproven if he is not a legitimate carrier. That wouldn't help the Project Veritas brand.

 

[Meathead]

Well well well. Looks like Project Veritas
1) Drafted the initial affidavit by postal worker Richard Hopkins (claiming without proof that USPS higher-ups told him to tamper with ballots)
2) Lied about Hopkins being coerced (WaPo linked to Project Veritas' own audio recording).
3) Said would release a 3-hour recording, but released a 2-hour recording. Hmmmm.
Here's Project Veritas' own-goal audio:

During the recorded interview, however, federal agents repeatedly reminded Hopkins that his cooperation was voluntary, and Hopkins agreed to sign a document stating that he was not coerced.
Asked by an agent whether he had legal representation, Hopkins said Project Veritas had a lawyer on retention “in case there’s anything that happens.” The agent told Hopkins that if he had a personal lawyer, “I would make whatever efforts possible to have that person here.” Hopkins said he didn’t have a lawyer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/postal-worker-hopkins-ballot-pennsylvania/2020/11/11/c9b70eda-2470-11eb-8599-406466ad1b8e_story.html

According to WaPo? LOL

 

[Lesh]

Look at it this way. Project Veritas may have written his affidavit to ensure all of the salacious details were there, they sell dirty laundry.

However, unlike in the past where they would send undercovers in and befriend people, this guy had to have reached out to them. How could they have known about this guy otherwise?

If a man goes to the point of exposing his identity and telling his story, I have to think it's more compelling than "anonymous sources", for instance.

What guy? The one they dressed in a postal carrier outfit?

You make a valid point. I have no evidence one way or another but that would be a bold stretch of reality when they know his assertions can easily be disproven if he is not a legitimate carrier. That wouldn't help the Project Veritas brand.

The Project Veritas "brand" is pretty fucking tarnished

 

[The Original Tree]

Well well well. Looks like Project Veritas
1) Drafted the initial affidavit by postal worker Richard Hopkins (claiming without proof that USPS higher-ups told him to tamper with ballots)
2) Lied about Hopkins being coerced (WaPo linked to Project Veritas' own audio recording).
3) Said would release a 3-hour recording, but released a 2-hour recording. Hmmmm.
Here's Project Veritas' own-goal audio:

During the recorded interview, however, federal agents repeatedly reminded Hopkins that his cooperation was voluntary, and Hopkins agreed to sign a document stating that he was not coerced.
Asked by an agent whether he had legal representation, Hopkins said Project Veritas had a lawyer on retention “in case there’s anything that happens.” The agent told Hopkins that if he had a personal lawyer, “I would make whatever efforts possible to have that person here.” Hopkins said he didn’t have a lawyer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/postal-worker-hopkins-ballot-pennsylvania/2020/11/11/c9b70eda-2470-11eb-8599-406466ad1b8e_story.html

The postal worker had to come out and call you a liar you pieces of lying crap. Why don't you pack your suitcase for your trip to Hell already instead of digging yourself a deeper hole like you do every day. At the rate you are going, you are digging yourself down to the 9th circle of Hell where your friends, Mao, Stalin and Hitler are. All you commie bastards can kiss Lady Liberties Ass before she mule kicks you straight in to Hell.

 

[occupied]

It's OK to be conservative but right wingers seriously need to quit being so easy to lie to.

 

[Christ_on_a_croissant]

Project Veritas should get a good lawyer to defend themselves

 

[westwall]

Project Veritas should get a good lawyer to defend themselves

They have a 100% victory rate in Court you ignorant twat.

 

[j-mac]

It's OK to be conservative...

We don’t need your permission, or approval...

 

[wamose]

The only thing for certain is that the Washington Post will never tell the truth if it hurts Democrats. Bezos and WaPo are anti American scumbags.

 

[occupied]

It's OK to be conservative...

We don’t need your permission, or approval...

In other words, it's possible to be a conservative without being gullible.

 

[Christ_on_a_croissant]

Project Veritas should get a good lawyer to defend themselves

They have a 100% victory rate in Court you ignorant twat.

Suuuure they do. That’s why O’Queef was convicted of a crime

 

[The Original Tree]

This was debunked so why are to mods allowing this thread to appear in politics?

 

[progressive hunter]

Well well well. Looks like Project Veritas
1) Drafted the initial affidavit by postal worker Richard Hopkins (claiming without proof that USPS higher-ups told him to tamper with ballots)
2) Lied about Hopkins being coerced (WaPo linked to Project Veritas' own audio recording).
3) Said would release a 3-hour recording, but released a 2-hour recording. Hmmmm.
Here's Project Veritas' own-goal audio:

During the recorded interview, however, federal agents repeatedly reminded Hopkins that his cooperation was voluntary, and Hopkins agreed to sign a document stating that he was not coerced.
Asked by an agent whether he had legal representation, Hopkins said Project Veritas had a lawyer on retention “in case there’s anything that happens.” The agent told Hopkins that if he had a personal lawyer, “I would make whatever efforts possible to have that person here.” Hopkins said he didn’t have a lawyer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/postal-worker-hopkins-ballot-pennsylvania/2020/11/11/c9b70eda-2470-11eb-8599-406466ad1b8e_story.html

Oh, so your whole "he recanted" story blew up in your face, so you trot this garbage out.

Here's a simple one for you.

You assholes CHEAT. And you got caught.

Everywhere!

its their typical alinsky tactic of when the cant refute the message they attack the messenger,,,

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Project Veritas should get a good lawyer to defend themselves

From what? It's not like they engineered widespread voter fraud in all the key swing states to
get Corrupt Joe Biden into office.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Suuuure they do. That’s why O’Queef was convicted of a crime

Find a court case they've lost instead of spewing out childish insults.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Wait, so the 4 hour FBI interview is a hoax? Weird, I listened to part of it. Was that fake?