Washington Post: Clinton Campaign paid for research that led to Trump-Russia dossier

[jc456]

You need to show a quid pro quo.

EVIDENCE SHOWS:
Russians wanted uranium.
The Clintons spent years selling Influence.
The Obama administration hid Russia's Bribery/Influence-Purchasing Crimes.
Hillary took over $100 million from the Russian lead trying to buy Uranium
Hillary was on the committee
Bill Clinton was on the Ex-KGB Payroll
The Russians got the Uranium.

'Nuff said.

No.
Clinton had no unilateral authority over the deal. You would need to show that she exerted influence over all of the players in order to make the deal happen.

yeah they call that indictment and a grand jury to do that. ready?

 

[bripat9643]

You need to show a quid pro quo.

EVIDENCE SHOWS:
Russians wanted uranium.
The Clintons spent years selling Influence.
The Obama administration hid Russia's Bribery/Influence-Purchasing Crimes.
Hillary took over $100 million from the Russian lead trying to buy Uranium
Hillary was on the committee
Bill Clinton was on the Ex-KGB Payroll
The Russians got the Uranium.

'Nuff said.

You forgot one:

Hillary was expected to win the election and become the future president.

 

[easyt65]

The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.

'The Source Can't Lie'? Bwuhahahaha....

Do you even hear yourself or think about what you write before you actually post it?

1. NONE of it has been proven. NO EVIDENCE. Only OPIION and unsubstantiated claims - like yours.

2. The information is from a foreign agent through a Russia-Associated/Paid company that just took the 5th when called to testify before Congress.

3. The use of this information in a US election was / is a CRIME. Hillary, Comey, Obama - they just got exposed for committing a crime...and you continue to argue how this Russian-generated propaganda is true ... because the accusation against Trump is more important to you than the actual CRIMES committed by Hillary, Comey, and Obama.

Bwuhahahaha.... You're freakin' HILARIOUS!

 

[bripat9643]

No Americans have done more to expedite that eventuality than the Trump team.

There is no 'Intelligence' in the Intel reported within the dossier. It has been exposed that the report is filled with Russia-generated propaganda, obtained from a foreign agent through a Russia-associated/Paid company that has taken the 5th when called to testify before Congress to answer questions. This false report PURCHASED / FUNDED by Hillary, Comey, Obama, and the DNC, furthermore, was illegally used in a US election versus a Presidential candidate.

In light of all of this, only a desperate, reality-denying leftist would cling to the claim that anything within the document was true, especially since it is - like every liberal / snowflake claim about Trump and his team so far - is not supported by any evidence.

There is no 'Intelligence' in the Intel reported within the dossier. It has been exposed that the report is filled with Russia-generated propaganda, obtained from a foreign agent through a Russia-associated/Paid company that has taken the 5th when called to testify before Congress to answer questions.

Not true in any way.

Read it. Don't ***** about the source, read it.
The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.

There are reports in the dossier that highlight the when, where and with who the meetings Trump people had which were continually denied but were later proven to be true. Not to mention the entire operation the Russians planned to influence the election.

You can continue to deny any of it is real, but you only make yourself look ignorant.

A Lot of the Steele Report Has Since Been Corroborated

Other than the dossier, what evidence is there that these meetings took place?

 

[MarkDuffy]

I miss the good old days when every RWnut on this forum was pissing himself with joy that HACKED emails might sink Hillary.

Don't count your chickens. Currently, Hillary Clinton is running all around the world desperately trying to divert attention from the Trump/Russia investigation has been turned on its head and is now investigating the Clinton/Uranium One corruption along with the Trump Dossier.

One question on the uranium one "corruption".

Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?

How did that work?

and the donations to the Clinton foundation were made years prior to the uranium deal. There was no connection.

 

[jc456]

I miss the good old days when every RWnut on this forum was pissing himself with joy that HACKED emails might sink Hillary.

Don't count your chickens. Currently, Hillary Clinton is running all around the world desperately trying to divert attention from the Trump/Russia investigation has been turned on its head and is now investigating the Clinton/Uranium One corruption along with the Trump Dossier.

One question on the uranium one "corruption".

Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?

How did that work?

and the donations to the Clinton foundation were made years prior to the uranium deal. There was no connection.

bhwaaahahahaha

 

[MarkDuffy]

lol, so HRC goes to prison for life.

How would that make Trump any less guilty of his alleged crimes?

what are those exactly? you still haven't produced anything gaslight boy.

These douoche bags behave as if the criminality of the Hillary campaign, the Obama regime and the DNC haven't been exposed.

Sucks, doesn't it. Snow White Hillary, aka the Greatest Criminal Mind to ever exist, keeps getting away with it

LOL

 

[jc456]

lol, so HRC goes to prison for life.

How would that make Trump any less guilty of his alleged crimes?

what are those exactly? you still haven't produced anything gaslight boy.

These douoche bags behave as if the criminality of the Hillary campaign, the Obama regime and the DNC haven't been exposed.

Sucks, doesn't it. Snow White Hillary, aka the Greatest Criminal Mind to ever exist, keeps getting away with it

LOL

yep, it is amazing what money can do for a criminal.

 

[RealDave]

This, coupled with the Russian/Clinton connection has completely blown up the entire Trump collusion lie!

Only withb the feeble minded Trumpettes.

Funding opposition research is typical.

The company the Democrats hired had been doing it for Republicans. OMG OMG OMG

They found bad stuff about Trump so you Trumpettes have to declare this illegal & fake news.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I miss the good old days when every RWnut on this forum was pissing himself with joy that HACKED emails might sink Hillary.

Don't count your chickens. Currently, Hillary Clinton is running all around the world desperately trying to divert attention from the Trump/Russia investigation has been turned on its head and is now investigating the Clinton/Uranium One corruption along with the Trump Dossier.

One question on the uranium one "corruption".

Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?

How did that work?

If you base your question on Hillary saying that her State Dept was one of nine agencies that need to approve the deal, than you have to ask yourself first, did any of the other eight agencies knew about ongoing FBI investigation on U1 when they approved it. Keep in mind that all those agencies were Barry's appointees, and they'll normally support each other opinion.

If they did know, than they're all in it together, corruption goes much deeper and they're all accountable for it.
If they did not know, than Hillary cannot use them as cover and excuse for her wrongdoing.

If you base your question on Hillary saying that her State Dept was one of nine agencies that need to approve the deal

Of course that's the basis because it is true.
It's actually 14 and the SoS has no authority on the council.

Composition of CFIUS

The Secretary of the Treasury is the Chairperson of CFIUS, and notices to CFIUS are received, processed, and coordinated at the staff level by the Staff Chairperson of CFIUS, who is the Director of the Office of Investment Security in the Department of the Treasury.

The members of CFIUS include the heads of the following departments and offices:

1. Department of the Treasury (chair)
2. Department of Justice
3. Department of Homeland Security
4. Department of Commerce
5. Department of Defense
6. Department of State
7. Department of Energy
8. Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
9. Office of Science & Technology Policy

The following offices also observe and, as appropriate, participate in CFIUS’s activities:

1. Office of Management & Budget
2. Council of Economic Advisors
3. National Security Council
4. National Economic Council
5. Homeland Security Council

The Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Labor are non-voting, ex-officio members of CFIUS with roles as defined by statute and regulation.

than you have to ask yourself first, did any of the other eight agencies knew about ongoing FBI investigation on U1 when they approved it

Why would any of them know about an investigation that potentially involves them?

Keep in mind that all those agencies were Barry's appointees, and they'll normally support each other opinion.

Simply not true. Your conjecture. Each department is reviewing the deal for potential national security concerns within their purview.

 

[MarkDuffy]

Keep hope alive conservatives

Perhaps you will get lucky and Hillary will show up in the Kennedy Assassination document dump today

 

[otto105]

The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.

'The Source Can't Lie'? Bwuhahahaha....

Do you even hear yourself or think about what you write before you actually post it?

1. NONE of it has been proven. NO EVIDENCE. Only OPIION and unsubstantiated claims - like yours.

2. The information is from a foreign agent through a Russia-Associated/Paid company that just took the 5th when called to testify before Congress.

3. The use of this information in a US election was / is a CRIME. Hillary, Comey, Obama - they just got exposed for committing a crime...and you continue to argue how this Russian-generated propaganda is true ... because the accusation against Trump is more important to you than the actual CRIMES committed by Hillary, Comey, and Obama.

Bwuhahahaha.... You're freakin' HILARIOUS!

What exactly has been proven trumpflake?

 

[MarkDuffy]

lol, so HRC goes to prison for life.

How would that make Trump any less guilty of his alleged crimes?

what are those exactly? you still haven't produced anything gaslight boy.

These douoche bags behave as if the criminality of the Hillary campaign, the Obama regime and the DNC haven't been exposed.

Sucks, doesn't it. Snow White Hillary, aka the Greatest Criminal Mind to ever exist, keeps getting away with it

LOL

yep, it is amazing what money can do for a criminal.

Yeah, just look at trump

 

[RealDave]

The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.

'The Source Can't Lie'? Bwuhahahaha....

Do you even hear yourself or think about what you write before you actually post it?

1. NONE of it has been proven. NO EVIDENCE. Only OPIION and unsubstantiated claims - like yours.

2. The information is from a foreign agent through a Russia-Associated/Paid company that just took the 5th when called to testify before Congress.

3. The use of this information in a US election was / is a CRIME. Hillary, Comey, Obama - they just got exposed for committing a crime...and you continue to argue how this Russian-generated propaganda is true ... because the accusation against Trump is more important to you than the actual CRIMES committed by Hillary, Comey, and Obama.

Bwuhahahaha.... You're freakin' HILARIOUS!

So you just admitted the Trump campaign contacting Assange for the Russian obtained hacked e-mails was illegal.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Bullshit, dope.

One example. One report in the dossier was that Russia was planning cyber attacks targeting Clinton to obtain information it could use to leak in an effort to influence the election.

This report was compiled late in 15 and early 16. Long before any of this was publicly known.

The very fact that it happened is verification that the Intel was correct.


Keep on truckin, dope.

Anyone could guess that without resorting to a forieng intelligence agent.

What a dumbass.
Yes, it was a very, very lucky guess.

Dope.

No, it wasn't lucky at all. Anyone who knew anything about Russian espionage activities could have guessed it. They've probably done similar things many times.

They haven't done similar things before, dope. Not on this scale.

You need to address all of the meetings with Russian officials reported in the dossier that Trump repeatedly denied happened that were later proven to have happened.

Another lucky guess?

The dossier is a proven pile of crap. It's opposition research with no supporting evidence. We don't need to address anything in the dossier. The CIA and the FBI need to explain why they used this piece of crap to justify invetigations of totally innocent Americans including a US presidential candidate. That's the kind of thing police states like North Korea engage in.

with no supporting evidence

LOL.
Except they came true.

 

[easyt65]

So you just admitted the Trump campaign contacting Assange for the Russian obtained hacked e-mails was illegal.

Ummm...I never said anything about Assange. Link to Trump contacting Assange?

 

[MarkDuffy]

The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.

'The Source Can't Lie'? Bwuhahahaha....

Do you even hear yourself or think about what you write before you actually post it?

1. NONE of it has been proven. NO EVIDENCE. Only OPIION and unsubstantiated claims - like yours.

2. The information is from a foreign agent through a Russia-Associated/Paid company that just took the 5th when called to testify before Congress.

3. The use of this information in a US election was / is a CRIME. Hillary, Comey, Obama - they just got exposed for committing a crime...and you continue to argue how this Russian-generated propaganda is true ... because the accusation against Trump is more important to you than the actual CRIMES committed by Hillary, Comey, and Obama.

Bwuhahahaha.... You're freakin' HILARIOUS!

So you just admitted the Trump campaign contacting Assange for the Russian obtained hacked e-mails was illegal.

It is amazing. All the things trump has been accused of they said were not crimes. In their fantasy, they just make trump more guilty with their desperation today.

trump ~ nothing is a crime

Hillary ~ everything is a crime, including breathing

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It is curious that the initial payment for this firm to dig up dirt on Donald Trump by a REPUBLICAN SENATOR whose identity, to date, is unknown. The name is in the records but it has not yet been disclosed.

It was after that when Hillary Clinton and the DNC took over the payment for the fake dossier.

I watch Zombie Joe on MSNBC this morning lying his ass off saying that Repubs funded the dossier. No wonder the left gets crushed when they go out and try to parrot these media idiots on USMB. You need to watch BOTH sides in times like this. And do as Bill Clinton did --- and "triangulate"..

September 2015: A still unknown Republican donor who opposed Donald Trump hires Fusion GPS to research the candidate, according to the New York Times.

Yep.. WAAAY before Steele and Fusion wrote the dossier using Russian spies. So what? It stinks that BOTH parties used the same company. But as far as anyone knows right now -- the Repubs paid for STRAIGHT OPO research. Not a Foreign fairytale.

And that's FACT -- the primaries were WAAAAY over when Steele and the Russians entered the picture.

Morning Joe/CNN --- ALL lying their asses off. Ask Politico. Repubs did not pay for "the dossier"..

No, the completed dossier was given to the FBI in June of 16. It was completed or mostly completed by the time the Dems took over the financing in April of 16. The work on it started in 15. That's what gives it credibility. There's no way Steele could have faked his Intel months before the events actually happened.

You really should read up on this stuff.

It has no credibility. It's opposition research. it's a collection of smears.

^ Die hard fool to the end.

 

[RealDave]

I miss the good old days when every RWnut on this forum was pissing himself with joy that HACKED emails might sink Hillary.

Don't count your chickens. Currently, Hillary Clinton is running all around the world desperately trying to divert attention from the Trump/Russia investigation has been turned on its head and is now investigating the Clinton/Uranium One corruption along with the Trump Dossier.

One question on the uranium one "corruption".

Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?

How did that work?

and the donations to the Clinton foundation were made years prior to the uranium deal. There was no connection.

That major Clinton Foundation contributor sold all interests in uranium in 2007 to a company Uranium One., a canadian based company.

So that means George W Bush sold our uranium to a foreign government!!! OMG OMG OMG OMG Someone arrest thast little ******!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

One question on the uranium one "corruption".

Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?

How did that work?

1. The Clintons had massive influence, which - if you look at evidence over decades - she sold all the time.

2. Who is to say Hillary was the ONLY one on that Committee the Russians 'bought'.
- Evidence shows the FBI, Holder, and Barry hid the Russia 'Bribery' scandal until after the Uranium One deal, and the witness was never allowed to testify about the MANY people / government people the Russians had paid. Now that the witness can testify, we may find out more people on that committee than just Hillary were 'bought'.

. The Clintons had massive influence, which - if you look at evidence over decades - she sold all the time.

Yes, yes. The "massive influence" angle.

You need to show a quid pro quo. Assumptions and conjecture don't cut it.

Who is to say Hillary was the ONLY one on that Committee the Russians 'bought'.
- Evidence shows the FBI, Holder, and Barry hid the Russia 'Bribery' scandal until after the Uranium One deal, and the witness was never allowed to testify about the MANY people / government people the Russians had paid. Now that the witness can testify, we may find out more people on that committee than just Hillary were 'bought'.

NDAs are par for the course with informants.
There is no evidence that anyone "hid" anything. If the investigation was ongoing, the FBI obviously didn't want this informant blabbing all of the details to Congress. Especially when they were investigating potential bribery within the govt itself.

You people need to employ some logic rather than jumping to dopey conclusions.

that is currently being pursued. the quid pro quo

Oh, so it isn't a fact yet then?