Washington Post audio of Trump berating and threatening Georgia Secretary of State for not "finding" votes to change election result. Sedition?

[Mac-7]

You are trying to claim that any error is fake news ..

Its not an error when WAPO quotes words that were not said

that's called a lie

 

[Mac-7]

Well? What call did you think led to the WP retraction??

This call to Raffensperger

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

 

[Faun]

You are trying to claim that any error is fake news ..

Its not an error when WAPO quotes words that were not said

that's called a lie

So you were lying then when you said...

Frances Watson does not exist

So when we read attacks on trump, on whites, on conservatives, on males, on Christians and others in the lib news media based on “unnamed sources“ we know its Frances Watson.

You should stop lying.

 

[Mac-7]

No it isnt. You are trying to claim that any error is fake news .

Ok

maybe WAPO was high on illegal drugs and honestly thought they heard trump say that on the recording

but if so the entire newsroom was snorting cocaine or whatever they use these days

 

[Faun]

Well? What call did you think led to the WP retraction??

This call to Raffensperger

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

LOLOLOL

No, you idiot. This was about a call to Frances Watson.

You don't even know what call this is about. You don't know he called Frances Watson, you thought it was a made up name. You clearly have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

And because I'm such a kind-hearted Liberal, I cursed on purpose just to give you an easy out to whine about my language, since your so delicate, so you don't have to address your ignorance.

 

[Mac-7]

You are trying to claim that any error is fake news ..

Its not an error when WAPO quotes words that were not said

that's called a lie

So you were lying then when you said...

​

Frances Watson does not exist

​

So when we read attacks on trump, on whites, on conservatives, on males, on Christians and others in the lib news media based on “unnamed sources“ we know its Frances Watson.​

​

You should stop lying.

Feel free to call that a lie if you wish

I googled the name and may have misspelled it

but that hardly compares to the newspaper of record in washington making up lies to injure a president

you can stonewall us on this if you like

but just understand that thanks to their lies WAPO has ZERO credibility

 

[Mac-7]

LOLOLOL

No, you idiot. This was about a call to Frances Watson.

Not acording to JohnLaw and the opening post

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

 

[Faun]

You are trying to claim that any error is fake news ..

Its not an error when WAPO quotes words that were not said

that's called a lie

So you were lying then when you said...

​

Frances Watson does not exist

​

So when we read attacks on trump, on whites, on conservatives, on males, on Christians and others in the lib news media based on “unnamed sources“ we know its Frances Watson.​

​

You should stop lying.

Feel free to call that a lie if you wish

I googled the name and may have misspelled it

but that hardly compares to the newspaper of record in washington making up lies to injure a president

you can stonewall us on this if you like

but just understand that thanks to their lies WAPO has ZERO credibility

Nope, you said an error is a lie. You admit you made an error, that means, according to you, you lied.

You should stop lying.

 

[Faun]

LOLOLOL

No, you idiot. This was about a call to Frances Watson.

Not acording to JohnLaw and the opening post

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

LOLOL

You compound your ignorance. The OP had nothing to do with the call that led to the Washington Post issuing a retraction. That was a different call entirely. On a different day and to a different person.

And now I see it was you who bumped this thread which has nothing to do with the Washington Post retraction; which is now explained -- you're ignorant.

 

[Mac-7]

Do any libs want to explain away tis story?

Faun, Coyote, mac1958, ect

there was a whole lot of verifyin aka lib lyin goin on

Numerous Liberal Outlets Claimed to Independently Verify Debunked WaPo Story

 

[Faun]

Do any libs want to explain away tis story?

Faun, Coyote, mac1958, ect

there was a whole lot of verifyin aka lib lyin goin on

Numerous Liberal Outlets Claimed to Independently Verify Debunked WaPo Story

Easily explained. Based on what you've posted, you're the liar, not the WP. You claim they lied but again, a lie is telling something while knowing it's not true. You have not shown in any way that the WP knew those quotes were false. That means you have not proven they lied. Yet you keep claiming they lied despite your own ignorance about knowing nothing about what you're talking about and despite your utter failure to show they lied.

 

[Mac-7]

The call occurred, it's nature was accurately described. If it was fake why is Georgia investigating it?

ABC News reports that it was raining the day that trump was seen by unnamed witnesses dumping a young womans lifeless body into the Potomac River

NBC News and NPR have confirmed through their own independent sources that it did rain on the day in question

IMPEACH TRUMP!!!

 

[Mac-7]

Do any libs want to explain away tis story?

Faun, Coyote, mac1958, ect

there was a whole lot of verifyin aka lib lyin goin on

Numerous Liberal Outlets Claimed to Independently Verify Debunked WaPo Story

Easily explained. Based on what you've posted, you're the liar, not the WP. You claim they lied but again, a lie is telling something while knowing it's not true. You have not shown in any way that the WP knew those quotes were false. That means you have not proven they lied. Yet you keep claiming they lied despite your own ignorance about knowing nothing about what you're talking about and despite your utter failure to show they lied.

We know the truth even if you stubbornly refuse to admit it

 

[Mac-7]

And I asked for proof that I had been fooled by anything.

You accepted the lie as the truth

that means you were fooled

I've been following your little hissy fit which all started with you saying that the left will accept "any lie" printed by WAPO about Donald Trump.

Please provide examples where WAPO lied about Donald Trump. Notice that their fact check record is "HIGH":

• Overall, we rate The Washington Post Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left and factually High due to the use of proper sources and a reasonable fact check record.

Washington Post - Bias and Credibility

LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

mediabiasfactcheck.com

I await your detailed response with specific incidents where WAPO lie, and if you don't respond, it proves that you're a lying piece of shit without a brain in your head.

Was your application for a refugee visa approved yet?

 

[Faun]

Do any libs want to explain away tis story?

Faun, Coyote, mac1958, ect

there was a whole lot of verifyin aka lib lyin goin on

Numerous Liberal Outlets Claimed to Independently Verify Debunked WaPo Story

Easily explained. Based on what you've posted, you're the liar, not the WP. You claim they lied but again, a lie is telling something while knowing it's not true. You have not shown in any way that the WP knew those quotes were false. That means you have not proven they lied. Yet you keep claiming they lied despite your own ignorance about knowing nothing about what you're talking about and despite your utter failure to show they lied.

We know the truth even if you stubbornly refuse to admit it

LOL

You can claim you know the truth all you want but as you're utterly incapable of proving they lied, all you really know is what you believe, which is not the truth.

Again, you don't know what call we're even talking about. You don't know who Trump was talking to. But you think you know the truth.

 

[Mac-7]

Regardless, they didn't have the audio back then when they first ran the story. They only had the people involved recalling the phone call.

Whats it called when someone writes a check for money they dont have in the bank?

If you apply that to media most of what the rightwing media reports would be fraudulant for relying only on what a source claims.

and yet you fail to post a single example,,

oh this is too easy....brb

so easy you didnt do it,,

Sorry two minutes was just too long for you to wait, so I will make it quick. Fox's reporting of Seth Rich is a good example. Eventually they wereforced to retract it, NOT because tbeir story was shown to be wrong (they ignored that) but because the family finally sued.

It helps for someone in the media to remind us about the suspicious circumstances surrounding seth rich’s murder

But we did not need Fox to tell us what to think about ot

 

[easyt65]

As always, it turns out to be false/ altered / manufactured crap, & the perpetrator is exposed, taking heat.

 

[Mac-7]

You can claim you know the truth all you want but as you're utterly incapable of proving they lied,

Either they are incompetent or they are liars

and I think they're liars

 

[Faun]

You can claim you know the truth all you want but as you're utterly incapable of proving they lied,

Either they are incompetent or they are liars

and I think they're liars

You're lying again. You really should stop. Those aren't the only options. Now you're simply framing the situation to meet your own agenda, described by you, and then selecting from your own framed set of options. Basically, you're citing yourself. And you're a proven liar.

 

[Mac-7]

You're lying again. You really should stop.

its your choice

either they lied to you or you are being led around by the nose by incompetents