Washington Post audio of Trump berating and threatening Georgia Secretary of State for not "finding" votes to change election result. Sedition?

[martybegan]

Exactly. There wasn't a lie, the correction was that Trump didn't literally say one sentence or something -

The lie is that the post claimed that literally said something he didnt say

That would only be a lie if they knew what they published wasn't true. They relied on verifiable sources. So prove they lied...

They heard what they wanted to hear, asked the person to pinky swear it was the truth, and ran with the story.

From verifiable sources. What newspaper doesn't do that?

"verifiable"

They wanted to believe the worst about Trump, and then ran with it. Meanwhile a Dem story would have been held without direct confirmation.

Yes, verifiable. It came from the deputy Secretary of State. Who by the way, is Republican.

They probably just verified the phone call happened, and didn't get into details because they had their ORANGE MAN BAD story and didn't need anything else.

Again, they got the story from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State who got the story directly from the investigator Trump called. Who knows why you think that's not a reliable source?

Evidently it was completely unreliable.

And again, verification was probably only about the people involved, and that a call took place.

 

[Mac-7]

Still waiting, liar.

I have not accused you of lying but rather being fooled by liars at WAPO

Washington Post audio of Trump berating and threatening Georgia Secretary of State for not "finding" votes to change election result. Sedition?

President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions. The Washington Post obtained a recording of the...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Mac-7]

They admitted 2 quotes were incorrect

How could the quotes be “incorrect?”

Was someone at WAPO doing speed and having hallucinations?

Meaning they only dreamed they heard it?

the quotes were never said but the lying lib news media told you they were

you were duped

 

[struth]

President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?

america isnt a democracy you stupid fuck,,,

What a moron. Hey dumb shit I know you want Trump declared as President for Life but you don't have to make it so obvious your hatred of our democratic institutions.

proving youre a stupid fuck isnt helping,,,

I never said anything about trump,,

We know what you meant Dumb fuck. Instead of being a pussy admit what I said is true? Don't run away.

the jokes on you dumbass,, I dont like trump and didnt vote for him,,,

but I will defend our republic from stupid mother fuckers like you that dont know what we are,,,

LOL.. a dumb fuck who calls himself "progressive hunter" expects us to believe his dumb ass post that he doesn't support Trump. LOL Trump is on tape attempting a coup and you support it. When you look in the mirror, you will see the stupid mother fucker.

its not a coup if hes following constitutional law,, which so far hes done,,

thats the difference from a democracy and a republic,,

but feel free to continue showing us what a stupid fucker you are,,,

Hewy Dumbshit..show me where in the Constitution it gives the president the right to threaten governors if they don't comply with his illegal demands or change votes to suit the will of the president. I'll wait dumbfuck.

Show me the threat, Fuckwit.

Hey... dumbshit listen to the tapes.

I did. No threats, liar.

'During their conversation, Trump issued a vague threat to both Raffensperger and Ryan Germany, the secretary of state’s general counsel, suggesting that if they don’t find that thousands of ballots in Fulton County have been illegally destroyed to block investigators — an allegation for which there is no evidence — they would be subject to criminal liability.

“That’s a criminal offense,” he said. “And you can’t let that happen. That’s a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer.”'

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

Looks like a threat to me.

It's actually just stating a fact....destroying ballots is a criminal offense.

Where did that happen?

I didn't say it did....but if it did, it is a crime, that's all the President and I said.

Try reading the post and comments before posting

If a frog had a glass ass it would break every time he jumps.

The courts have ruled there was no voter fraud.

More proof the second impeachment was a hoax, based on lies, and a clear abuse of power

 

[Faun]

Exactly. There wasn't a lie, the correction was that Trump didn't literally say one sentence or something -

The lie is that the post claimed that literally said something he didnt say

That would only be a lie if they knew what they published wasn't true. They relied on verifiable sources. So prove they lied...

They heard what they wanted to hear, asked the person to pinky swear it was the truth, and ran with the story.

From verifiable sources. What newspaper doesn't do that?

"verifiable"

They wanted to believe the worst about Trump, and then ran with it. Meanwhile a Dem story would have been held without direct confirmation.

Yes, verifiable. It came from the deputy Secretary of State. Who by the way, is Republican.

They probably just verified the phone call happened, and didn't get into details because they had their ORANGE MAN BAD story and didn't need anything else.

Again, they got the story from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State who got the story directly from the investigator Trump called. Who knows why you think that's not a reliable source?

Evidently it was completely unreliable.

And again, verification was probably only about the people involved, and that a call took place.

Not really since Trump did say those things. Just not in those exact words.

 

[martybegan]

Exactly. There wasn't a lie, the correction was that Trump didn't literally say one sentence or something -

The lie is that the post claimed that literally said something he didnt say

That would only be a lie if they knew what they published wasn't true. They relied on verifiable sources. So prove they lied...

They heard what they wanted to hear, asked the person to pinky swear it was the truth, and ran with the story.

From verifiable sources. What newspaper doesn't do that?

"verifiable"

They wanted to believe the worst about Trump, and then ran with it. Meanwhile a Dem story would have been held without direct confirmation.

Yes, verifiable. It came from the deputy Secretary of State. Who by the way, is Republican.

They probably just verified the phone call happened, and didn't get into details because they had their ORANGE MAN BAD story and didn't need anything else.

Again, they got the story from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State who got the story directly from the investigator Trump called. Who knows why you think that's not a reliable source?

Evidently it was completely unreliable.

And again, verification was probably only about the people involved, and that a call took place.

Not really since Trump did say those things. Just not in those exact words.

"Fake but accurate"

You morons really need to get a better playbook.

 

[Faun]

Trump called Watson and asked her to look for fraud. Watson then conveyed that to Jordan Fuchs, Georgia's deputy Secretary of State. Fuchs then informed the Post.

the call watson reported is not the one that WAPO has printed a retraction for

those are different calls

So what call did you think led to the WP retraction??

 

[Mac-7]

Just not in those exact words.

WAPO published those exact words in quotes.

that makes them a lie

 

[2aguy]

President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

Trump is engaging of sedition and overturning the will of the people through fraud.

Trump should be arrested for sedition for attempting to overthrow the newly elected government of the United States of America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

Is American democracy next?

Nope. Not when Democrats are stealing elections with vote harvesting.

Which states of contention, had ballot harvesting?

Georgia, Pennsylvania, Minnesota........

 

[Faun]

Exactly. There wasn't a lie, the correction was that Trump didn't literally say one sentence or something -

The lie is that the post claimed that literally said something he didnt say

That would only be a lie if they knew what they published wasn't true. They relied on verifiable sources. So prove they lied...

They heard what they wanted to hear, asked the person to pinky swear it was the truth, and ran with the story.

From verifiable sources. What newspaper doesn't do that?

"verifiable"

They wanted to believe the worst about Trump, and then ran with it. Meanwhile a Dem story would have been held without direct confirmation.

Yes, verifiable. It came from the deputy Secretary of State. Who by the way, is Republican.

They probably just verified the phone call happened, and didn't get into details because they had their ORANGE MAN BAD story and didn't need anything else.

Again, they got the story from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State who got the story directly from the investigator Trump called. Who knows why you think that's not a reliable source?

Evidently it was completely unreliable.

And again, verification was probably only about the people involved, and that a call took place.

Not really since Trump did say those things. Just not in those exact words.

"Fake but accurate"

You morons really need to get a better playbook.

Dumbfuck, he said if they look at signatures they will find they don't match from prior elections. That would be him saying find the fraud. The WP quoted him saying, "find the fraud." While he didn't use those words, that is what he said.

 

[Faun]

Just not in those exact words.

WAPO published those exact words in quotes.

that makes them a lie

No, it make you the liar. Again, lying is saying something known to be a lie. You failed to produce any evidence they lied, as opposed to being wrong. You continue to call them the liar but that only makes you the liar.

 

[martybegan]

Exactly. There wasn't a lie, the correction was that Trump didn't literally say one sentence or something -

The lie is that the post claimed that literally said something he didnt say

That would only be a lie if they knew what they published wasn't true. They relied on verifiable sources. So prove they lied...

They heard what they wanted to hear, asked the person to pinky swear it was the truth, and ran with the story.

From verifiable sources. What newspaper doesn't do that?

"verifiable"

They wanted to believe the worst about Trump, and then ran with it. Meanwhile a Dem story would have been held without direct confirmation.

Yes, verifiable. It came from the deputy Secretary of State. Who by the way, is Republican.

They probably just verified the phone call happened, and didn't get into details because they had their ORANGE MAN BAD story and didn't need anything else.

Again, they got the story from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State who got the story directly from the investigator Trump called. Who knows why you think that's not a reliable source?

Evidently it was completely unreliable.

And again, verification was probably only about the people involved, and that a call took place.

Not really since Trump did say those things. Just not in those exact words.

"Fake but accurate"

You morons really need to get a better playbook.

Dumbfuck, he said if they look at signatures they will find they don't match from prior elections. That would be him saying find the fraud. The WP quoted him saying, "find the fraud." While he didn't use those words, that is what he said.

His actual words were that he believed there was fraud and that the person should investigate. The false statement implied that he was directing them to "find" fraud, not investigate the potential for it.

The two versions are entirely different in intent.

 

[Mac-7]

Dumbfuck

Fuck you

if the audio was so damning why did the lib media have to embellish it with lies?

 

[Mac-7]

No, it make you the liar. Again, lying is saying something known to be a lie. You failed to produce any evidence they lied, as opposed to being wrong. You continue to call them the liar but that only makes you the liar.

WAPO affirmed the quotes and presented them to the public as facts

That means you were lied to

 

[Mac1958]

Still waiting, liar.

I have not accused you of lying but rather being fooled by liars at WAPO

Washington Post audio of Trump berating and threatening Georgia Secretary of State for not "finding" votes to change election result. Sedition?

President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions. The Washington Post obtained a recording of the...

www.usmessageboard.com

And I asked for proof that I had been fooled by anything.

So far, nothing. As I expected.

 

[Mac-7]

And I asked for proof that I had been fooled by anything.

So far, nothing. As I expected.

Meaning you knew the WAPO quotes were a lie but decided to use them to bash trump anyway?

I never thought you would stoop that low

 

[Faun]

Exactly. There wasn't a lie, the correction was that Trump didn't literally say one sentence or something -

The lie is that the post claimed that literally said something he didnt say

That would only be a lie if they knew what they published wasn't true. They relied on verifiable sources. So prove they lied...

They heard what they wanted to hear, asked the person to pinky swear it was the truth, and ran with the story.

From verifiable sources. What newspaper doesn't do that?

"verifiable"

They wanted to believe the worst about Trump, and then ran with it. Meanwhile a Dem story would have been held without direct confirmation.

Yes, verifiable. It came from the deputy Secretary of State. Who by the way, is Republican.

They probably just verified the phone call happened, and didn't get into details because they had their ORANGE MAN BAD story and didn't need anything else.

Again, they got the story from Georgia's Republican deputy Secretary of State who got the story directly from the investigator Trump called. Who knows why you think that's not a reliable source?

Evidently it was completely unreliable.

And again, verification was probably only about the people involved, and that a call took place.

Not really since Trump did say those things. Just not in those exact words.

"Fake but accurate"

You morons really need to get a better playbook.

Dumbfuck, he said if they look at signatures they will find they don't match from prior elections. That would be him saying find the fraud. The WP quoted him saying, "find the fraud." While he didn't use those words, that is what he said.

His actual words were that he believed there was fraud and that the person should investigate. The false statement implied that he was directing them to "find" fraud, not investigate the potential for it.

The two versions are entirely different in intent.

He asked her to look at signatures from a prior election to compare with signatures from the 2020 election. Who the fuck do you think you're fooling other than yourself?

"But if you go back two years, and if you can get to Fulton, you are going to find things that are going to be unbelievable."​

 

[Faun]

Dumbfuck

Fuck you

if the audio was so damning why did the lib media have to embellish it with lies?

Damn, you have some delicate feelings. I didn't even say that to you.

Regardless, they didn't have the audio back then when they first ran the story. They only had the people involved recalling the phone call.

 

[Faun]

No, it make you the liar. Again, lying is saying something known to be a lie. You failed to produce any evidence they lied, as opposed to being wrong. You continue to call them the liar but that only makes you the liar.

WAPO affirmed the quotes and presented them to the public as facts

That means you were lied to

You still have zero evidence they lied.

 

[blackhawk]