Was stumped by a Creationist

[DOTR]

You cannot create a star on earth because it has never been done.

However, a cell was created on earth, so why then and not now?

Get it?

Of course, stars have been created on earth. What do you think nuclear fusion is? That's mini-stars, lasting for just fractions of a second, but still...

Mother Earth had a billion years to experiment with different cocktails of chemicals in quite a variety of conditions to create life. Give humankind some time to figure out how she's done it; they'll get there, even though Mother Earth didn't leave blueprints lying around to be found billions of years later.

In other words, you don't get it; you don't have a hint of the beginnings of an argument, but that just reinforces your certainty, right?

You don't get it! "Mother Earth" isn't a "Mother". Earth could have 20 Trillion years to "experiment" and not accomplish one thing! GOD is the life force. God is the designer. God is the Creator. God can love!

The idea that a giant gaseous vertebrate with a penis created the universe doesn't pass the laugh test.

God is not a sexual being. He is a spirit.

Equally, there is no proof or evidence of the big bang.

Only to those whose ignorance is invincible.

Do you know of the proof of the big bang? Where has science said that we know undoubtedly that the big bang is fact?

Science doesn't do proof, it does evidence. Remember that word you used?

Where is all the evidence that evolutionist use to fabricate their theories since Science proves nothing?.

Then why do the Christians always refer to him with masculine pronouns?

No scientist has said we know "undoubtedly" that the big bang is a fact. Only theists are that sure about anything.

I think all religions picture their god as masculine. But I can say for certain that Christians do.

 

[james bond]

...

BUT NO evidence that a single species evolved into TWO or more distinctly DIFFERENT species.

Evidence of common descent
Evidence of common descent - Wikipedia

• 1 Evidence from comparative physiology and biochemistry
  • 1.1 Genetics
  • 1.2 Specific examples from comparative physiology and biochemistry
• 2 Evidence from comparative anatomy
  • 2.1 Atavisms
  • 2.2 Evolutionary developmental biology and embryonic development
  • 2.3 Homologous structures and divergent (adaptive) evolution
  • 2.4 Nested hierarchies and classification
  • 2.5 Vestigial structures
  • 2.6 Specific examples from comparative anatomy
• 3 Evidence from paleontology
  • 3.1 Fossil record
  • 3.2 Limitations
  • 3.3 Specific examples from paleontology
• 4 Evidence from biogeography
  • 4.1 Continental distribution
  • 4.2 Island biogeography
  • 4.3 Ring species
  • 4.4 Specific examples from biogeography
• 5 Evidence from selection
  • 5.1 Artificial selection and experimental evolution
  • 5.2 Invertebrates
  • 5.3 Microbes
  • 5.4 Plants and fungi
  • 5.5 Vertebrates
• 6 Evidence from speciation
  • 6.1 Fossils
  • 6.2 Invertebrates
  • 6.3 Plants
  • 6.4 Vertebrates
• 7 Evidence from coloration
  • 7.1 Mimicry and aposematism
  • 7.2 Camouflage
• 8 Evidence from mathematical modeling
• 9 See also
• 10 References
• 11 Sources
• 12 External links

`

Anyone could write that malarkey.

 

[Mousterian]

Y'know, a politician once floated the idea that π was way too complicated at 3.141... , and should be legislated to be 3. Fortunately, there was an adult in the room, and it didn't go far.

 

[cnm]

Anyone could write that malarkey.

 

[abu afak]

...

BUT NO evidence that a single species evolved into TWO or more distinctly DIFFERENT species.

Evidence of common descent
Evidence of common descent - Wikipedia

• 1 Evidence from comparative physiology and biochemistry
  • 1.1 Genetics
  • 1.2 Specific examples from comparative physiology and biochemistry
• 2 Evidence from comparative anatomy
  • 2.1 Atavisms
  • 2.2 Evolutionary developmental biology and embryonic development
  • 2.3 Homologous structures and divergent (adaptive) evolution
  • 2.4 Nested hierarchies and classification
  • 2.5 Vestigial structures
  • 2.6 Specific examples from comparative anatomy
• 3 Evidence from paleontology
  • 3.1 Fossil record
  • 3.2 Limitations
  • 3.3 Specific examples from paleontology
• 4 Evidence from biogeography
  • 4.1 Continental distribution
  • 4.2 Island biogeography
  • 4.3 Ring species
  • 4.4 Specific examples from biogeography
• 5 Evidence from selection
  • 5.1 Artificial selection and experimental evolution
  • 5.2 Invertebrates
  • 5.3 Microbes
  • 5.4 Plants and fungi
  • 5.5 Vertebrates
• 6 Evidence from speciation
  • 6.1 Fossils
  • 6.2 Invertebrates
  • 6.3 Plants
  • 6.4 Vertebrates
• 7 Evidence from coloration
  • 7.1 Mimicry and aposematism
  • 7.2 Camouflage
• 8 Evidence from mathematical modeling
• 9 See also
• 10 References
• 11 Sources
• 12 External links

`

Anyone could write that malarkey.

Another Dishonest reply.
Anyone could Not write that Wiki entry, nor fill in it's subtopics.

You're a LYING FOR JESUS piece of **** who'll do/say/drivel up anything to save his house of cards godist social life.
`

 

[Karl Rand]

You're a LYING FOR JESUS piece of **** who'll do/say/drivel up anything to save his house of cards godist social life.
`

Please, can anyone explain to me what a ‘godist social life’ is?

 

[Karl Rand]

I think all religions picture their god as masculine.

Where on earth did you get that idea?

 

[dblack]

Tell him he can’t prove that our universe isn’t the result of a cosmic fart from an extra-universal lesbian orgy. That’s not falsifiable either.

You just had to bring gender into it, didn't ya?

 

[Votto]

You cannot create a star on earth because it has never been done.

However, a cell was created on earth, so why then and not now?

Get it?

Of course, stars have been created on earth. What do you think nuclear fusion is? That's mini-stars, lasting for just fractions of a second, but still...

Mother Earth had a billion years to experiment with different cocktails of chemicals in quite a variety of conditions to create life. Give humankind some time to figure out how she's done it; they'll get there, even though Mother Earth didn't leave blueprints lying around to be found billions of years later.

In other words, you don't get it; you don't have a hint of the beginnings of an argument, but that just reinforces your certainty, right?

So man has created a small little star but no small little living cell?

Interesting, isn't it.

Scientists really are clueless as to how to make a cell.

Does that trouble you at all?

 

[Votto]

You cannot create a star on earth because it has never been done.

However, a cell was created on earth, so why then and not now?

Get it?

Of course, stars have been created on earth. What do you think nuclear fusion is? That's mini-stars, lasting for just fractions of a second, but still...

Mother Earth had a billion years to experiment with different cocktails of chemicals in quite a variety of conditions to create life. Give humankind some time to figure out how she's done it; they'll get there, even though Mother Earth didn't leave blueprints lying around to be found billions of years later.

In other words, you don't get it; you don't have a hint of the beginnings of an argument, but that just reinforces your certainty, right?

You don't get it! "Mother Earth" isn't a "Mother". Earth could have 20 Trillion years to "experiment" and not accomplish one thing! GOD is the life force. God is the designer. God is the Creator. God can love!

In the universe. life only had less than 16 billion years to create life to be exact.

Earth is around 4 billion years old, and almost immediately life has been found in those early days which means either life was seeded on Earth or life does not take as long to evolve as we are lead to believe. And why are we led to believe it takes soooooo long for life to evolve? That way scientists don't take any heat for not being able to replicate it. They just shrug their shoulders and say, "It's a billions of years process" and walk away. Trouble it, that's a lie.

 

[cnm]

Earth is around 4 billion years old, and almost immediately life has been found in those early days

The bullshit never stops and the links never start.

Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, but the oldest rocks still in existence date back to just 4 billion years ago. Not long after that rock record begins, tantalizing evidence of life emerges: A set of filament-like fossils from Australia, reported in the journal Astrobiology in 2013, may be the remains of a microbial mat that might have been extracting energy from sunlight some 3.5 billion years ago. Another contender for world's oldest life is a set of rocks in Greenland that may hold the fossils of 3.7-billion-year-old colonies of cyanobacteria, which form layered structures called stromatolites.
What Was the First Life on Earth?​

 

[Karl Rand]

Tell him he can’t prove that our universe isn’t the result of a cosmic fart from an extra-universal lesbian orgy. That’s not falsifiable either.

You just had to bring gender into it, didn't ya?

Extra universal lesbian orgy? Have they made a movie of it yet? Maybe they could make a musical out of it with K D Lang playing the Godess?

 

[DOTR]

Earth is around 4 billion years old, and almost immediately life has been found in those early days

The bullshit never stops and the links never start.

Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, but the oldest rocks still in existence date back to just 4 billion years ago. Not long after that rock record begins, tantalizing evidence of life emerges: A set of filament-like fossils from Australia, reported in the journal Astrobiology in 2013, may be the remains of a microbial mat that might have been extracting energy from sunlight some 3.5 billion years ago. Another contender for world's oldest life is a set of rocks in Greenland that may hold the fossils of 3.7-billion-year-old colonies of cyanobacteria, which form layered structures called stromatolites.
What Was the First Life on Earth?​

Life began very quickly. And it happened one time. A great mystery there.

 

[danielpalos]

We don't have Perfect Knowledge of Good and Evil, either. Science must provide an answer, eventually.

Why must it?

For the sake of Perfect Knowledge.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Scientists really are clueless as to how to make a cell.

Does that trouble you at all?

Therefore....magic! Or is it aliens? Hard to keep up with the nonsense on this board.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And why are we led to believe it takes soooooo long for life to evolve?

Led to believe...by whom, exactly? You're making stuff up. One thing is certain: At no point, ever, have you lifted a finger to educate yourself on what scientists actually say about abiogenesis and the science they are doing to figure it out.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

In reality, there are a few schools of abiogenesis in the realm of science, all with some overlap. However, in all of them, it is necessary for the process of phosphorylation to occur. So, scientists set out to find how such a thing would happen naturally. It took years, but they found it:

Scientists Just Found a Vital Missing Link in The Origins of Life on Earth

 

[abu afak]

You're a LYING FOR JESUS piece of **** who'll do/say/drivel up anything to save his house of cards godist social life.
`

Please, can anyone explain to me what a ‘godist social life’ is?

Yes, it's the encompassing way of life in the ie, Bible Belt.
One's whole family and social life is built around the Church/Jesus.
If you were to declare yourself an Atheist or not particpate, you'd be an outcast.
`

 

[james bond]

...

BUT NO evidence that a single species evolved into TWO or more distinctly DIFFERENT species.

Evidence of common descent
Evidence of common descent - Wikipedia

• 1 Evidence from comparative physiology and biochemistry
  • 1.1 Genetics
  • 1.2 Specific examples from comparative physiology and biochemistry
• 2 Evidence from comparative anatomy
  • 2.1 Atavisms
  • 2.2 Evolutionary developmental biology and embryonic development
  • 2.3 Homologous structures and divergent (adaptive) evolution
  • 2.4 Nested hierarchies and classification
  • 2.5 Vestigial structures
  • 2.6 Specific examples from comparative anatomy
• 3 Evidence from paleontology
  • 3.1 Fossil record
  • 3.2 Limitations
  • 3.3 Specific examples from paleontology
• 4 Evidence from biogeography
  • 4.1 Continental distribution
  • 4.2 Island biogeography
  • 4.3 Ring species
  • 4.4 Specific examples from biogeography
• 5 Evidence from selection
  • 5.1 Artificial selection and experimental evolution
  • 5.2 Invertebrates
  • 5.3 Microbes
  • 5.4 Plants and fungi
  • 5.5 Vertebrates
• 6 Evidence from speciation
  • 6.1 Fossils
  • 6.2 Invertebrates
  • 6.3 Plants
  • 6.4 Vertebrates
• 7 Evidence from coloration
  • 7.1 Mimicry and aposematism
  • 7.2 Camouflage
• 8 Evidence from mathematical modeling
• 9 See also
• 10 References
• 11 Sources
• 12 External links

`

Anyone could write that malarkey.

Another Dishonest reply.
Anyone could Not write that Wiki entry, nor fill in it's subtopics.

You're a LYING FOR JESUS piece of **** who'll do/say/drivel up anything to save his house of cards godist social life.
`

Ad hominem attack. It means you lost and don't know anything. A nimrod. If you did, then you could explain common descent in a couple of sentences.

 

[james bond]

Scientists really are clueless as to how to make a cell.

Does that trouble you at all?

Therefore....magic! Or is it aliens? Hard to keep up with the nonsense on this board.

Imaginary science of abiogenesis. No abiogenesis also means no aliens.