Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,828
- 1,790
http://www.economist.com/agenda/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3639483
TO THE leadership of the United Nations, Thursday February 3rd must have felt like Judgment Day. A few blocks away from the world bodys New York headquarters, Paul Volcker, a respected former head of Americas Federal Reserve, issued the first interim report of his committees investigation into the UN's oil-for-food programme for Iraq. Its findings do not flatter the organisation, and are devastatingly critical of Benon Sevan, the executive director of the oil-for-food programme.
The programme was begun in 1996, allowing Iraq to sell oil to buy food and humanitarian goods to ease the suffering of sanctions-hit Iraqis. Iraq stonewalled the creation of oil-for-food until it received sole discretion from the UN in choosing buyers for oil and sellers of food and medicine. This allowed Saddam Husseins regime to make huge amounts of money in a variety of frauds, such as overcharging the programme for imports and levying illegal surcharges on oil sales. It is also alleged that Saddam awarded oil vouchers to buy political influence.
Mr Volckers interim report answered some, though by no means all, of the questions surrounding the scandal. According to the report, Saddam-era Iraqi documents indicated that the programme head asked Iraq to allocate oil to a company called African Middle East Petroleum (AMEP), represented by a friend of Mr Sevans, Fakhry Abdelnour (who is also a distant cousin of former UN secretary-general Boutros Boutros-Ghali). In return, Mr Sevan fought to allow Iraq to buy spare parts for its oil infrastructure, as opposed to food and the like, with its oil-for-food proceeds. In doing so, said Mr Volcker, Mr Sevan placed himself in a grave and continuing conflict-of-interest situation...