bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,368
- 2,180
I haven't mentioned Miranda rights in days, moron. You lose on every other point, like claiming a plea is a confession, so you harp incessantly on the one thing you got right. That's your SOP.Laughing....except the actual Miranda v. Arizona ruling which states that miranda warnings are required only when someone is in custody.Almost everything you post is backed by nothing, dumbass.ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.
Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.
At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.
Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
Which you ignore.
And of course, the actual Flynn plea agreement where the Statement of Offenses lays out the exact lies that Flynn told to federal investigators and the exact violations of the law those lies created. With Flynn stipulating in his "Defendant's Acceptance" that the Statement of Offenses is accurate under penalty of perjury.
Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents
Which you refuse to read.
See, that's the difference between us. I'm citing the law and the actual plea agreements. You're just citing yourself.
You were right about one thing. Other than that, you got bupkiss. "Sworn testimony" made with a gun to your head isn't worth jack shit.
The 'gun to your head' is imaginary. Again, you keep making shit up, backed by nothing. While ignoring the actual evidence. Like.....Flynn's plea agreement. You still refuse to even look at it. And then laughably inisist that if you won't look at it, its not evidence.
Good luck with that.
Apparently I only have to endure the next 1000 times you post on that subject.
As you've demonstrated repeatedly, you can just ignore the Miranda ruling and Flynn's plea agrement and make up whatever you'd like in the wasteland of your imagination.
But alas, your imaginary version of Miranda isn't what the courts follow. They follow the *actual* ruling. And your imaginary version of Flynn's plea agreement isn't what the court's follow. They follow the *actual* plea agreement.
The bug of your imagination keeps hitting the windshield of reality. And the collision isn't pretty.