A fast google search:
Breitbart News and a noted Cherokee genealogist have documented there is no evidence to support Senator Warren’s claim of Cherokee ancestry.
There is evidence, however, that shows Senator Warren’s great-great-great grandfather, Jonathan Crawford, was a member of the Tennessee militia in the 1830s who rounded up the local Cherokee as the first step in their forced “Trail of Tears” journey to Oklahoma.
The Globe reported Wednesday that Senator Warren writes in her book “I never asked for special treatment when I applied to college, to law school, or for jobs.”
But, as Breitbart News
reported in May 2012, Senator Warren has “[f]or twenty-five years since 1986, and without a shred of credible evidence . . . claimed to have Native American ancestry.
She’s made this claim, apparently, to three separate employers–the University of Texas Law School, the University of Pennsylvania Law School, and Harvard Law School. None apparently asked her for proof, nor did she offer any.”
Elizabeth Warren Repeats Her False Claims of Native American Ancestry in New Book - Breitbart
Yeah yeah I've read all that. It doesn't make the point. And going from Twit-er to Dimbart isn't much of a step forward.
The question remains -- where are these "perks"?? Where did Warren get a special treatment? Where did someone else miss one?
Where indeed.
And the other one -- where is the "lie"?
Ask CrusaderFrank about proving a negative. The fact that Dimbart says they can't find something.... does not mean therefore there's no such thing.
Somebody needs to prove a negative.
Then you have a "lie".
Don't be so gullible Gracie. People like Dimbart have agendas, and ethics ain't one of them.
And PS Speaking of Dimbart, where your link above claims:
She’s made this claim, apparently, to three separate employers–the University of Texas Law School, the University of Pennsylvania Law School, and Harvard Law School. None apparently asked her for proof, nor did she offer any.”
--
this one (an actual newspaper) contradicts:
>> For her employment documents at the University of Texas, Warren indicated that she was “white.” <<
And as for Harvard, from the same link:
>> The Herald has twice quoted Charles Fried, the head of the Harvard appointing committee that recommended Warren for her position in 1995, saying that the Democratic candidate’s heritage didn’t come up during the course of her hiring. “It simply played no role in the appointments process,” he said. “It was not mentioned and I didn’t mention it to the faculty.”
The Herald later quoted Fried, a former U.S. Solicitor General under President Ronald Reagan, saying, “I can state categorically that the subject of her Native American ancestry never once was mentioned.” <<
And further btw -- having a relative on the white side of the Trail of Tears in
no way means one could not have had a relative on the the other side as well. Think about it.