Warmists Hung Out To Dry

[Mousterian]

Nasa records a 200mm (8inch) rise in sea-level since the mid-19th century:

This is a very significant change, easily verified, but not enough to swamp a lighthouse on the beach.

 

[mamooth]

For example...here is a photo of the cape florida lighthouse circa 1920's..as you can see...it is practically in the water even back then...

You're actually comparing random photos of unknown tidal states, and pretending it means something?

You do know what tides are, don't you? Most people do, but you appear to be one of the few who doesn't understand what tides are. So why are you bothering the grownups?

 

[Synthaholic]

the rate of sea level is not increasing in miami any more rapidly than it has for the past 100 years...and slower than it has for a good deal of that time.

This is false.

 

[SSDD]

Nasa records a 200mm (8inch) rise in sea-level since the mid-19th century:

This is a very significant change, easily verified, but not enough to swamp a lighthouse on the beach.

Luckily, old data is still hanging around to be found to bring the fraud of the climate science modern climate science community into high relief...even if folks like you are going to deny the reality.... This is the sea level increase between 1880 and 1980 shown by NASA. The graph shows an increase of just over 3 inches of sea level increase between 1880 and 1980....NOTE the sharp decrease in the rate of increase after 1950.

You can't really scare people with a 3 inch sea level increase over a 100 year period so the frauds in climate science increased the figure to 6 inches per century with nothing more than adjustments.... NOTE the completely FAKE acceleration after 1950.

Here is an overlay of the two graphs on the same time scale. One is scientific in nature...showing actual observed sea level increases...the other is a piece of alarmist propaganda that has nothing whatsoever to do with science and everything to do with supporting a fraudulent narrative.

Then in 2004, the University of Colorado showed 2.8 mm per year rate of sea level increase.

2.8 mm per year? Not very scary...even to alarmists so again, the data is heavily massaged using inappropriate, and completely fraudulent methods to achieve a 3.3mm per year rate of increase. A global isostatic adjustment was applied which is blatantly fraudulent in the context of sea level increase. Such adjustments are correct in the context of calculating ocean depth as the sea floor sinks and have absolutely no relationship to measuring sea level by satellites. Here is what the adjustments look like...

Here is an overlay of the two graphs at the same time scale.

So some numbers got a massage and a picture was painted to give the appearance of imminent disaster. Shit happens...right? But when the "spokes agency" for modern climate science repeats the fraud as truth....we have real evidence of deliberate data corruption with the intent to deceive regarding climate change. In 1990 the IPCC said:

Then in 2013 using blatantly massaged data and obviously fraudulent graphs, the IPCC said exactly the opposite of what they said in 1990.

And just for fun...take a look at the very early tide information...what sort of new information do you think would require changing tide data from 60, 70, 80, and even 100 years ago?

The fact is that the sea level claims are fraudulent...and anyone who believes them has either been fooled, or is being nothing more than one of the legion of useful idiots.

 

[SSDD]

the rate of sea level is not increasing in miami any more rapidly than it has for the past 100 years...and slower than it has for a good deal of that time.

This is false.

Of course it is true...claims of accelerated sea level are bullshit...look at the post above to see the blatant manipulation of sea level data for political purpose.

 

[jc456]

For example...here is a photo of the cape florida lighthouse circa 1920's..as you can see...it is practically in the water even back then...

You're actually comparing random photos of unknown tidal states, and pretending it means something?

You do know what tides are, don't you? Most people do, but you appear to be one of the few who doesn't understand what tides are. So why are you bothering the grownups?

what exactly do tides have to do with sea level rise? Tides have always existed. So honestly, that is just more from you. The photos are ~100 years apart and as I look at the recent photo, I see less water. But I can see grass and a defined coastline. So I can tell by the photo that water is not present near the tower at any time. hmmmmm. got more nonsense?

 

[mamooth]

So, jc also clearly doesn't know how tides function. Fascinating, how most deniers are all so utterly incapable of even the most basic logical thinking.

And that was some impressive fraud from SSDD. His baseline mismatching was especially blatant. He's pulling out all the stop with his fraud.

 

[jc456]

So, jc also clearly doesn't know how tides function. Fascinating, how most deniers are all so utterly incapable of even the most basic logical thinking.

And that was some impressive fraud from SSDD. His baseline mismatching was especially blatant. He's pulling out all the stop with his fraud.

Tides happen twice a day during specific alignment with sun, earth and moon. What does that have to do with the two photos?

 

[SSDD]

So, jc also clearly doesn't know how tides function. Fascinating, how most deniers are all so utterly incapable of even the most basic logical thinking.

And that was some impressive fraud from SSDD. His baseline mismatching was especially blatant. He's pulling out all the stop with his fraud.

Tides happen twice a day during specific alignment with sun, earth and moon. What does that have to do with the two photos?

Thinking isn't the crazy cat lady's best thing....she can't look at the older picture and grasp the fact that the lighthouse is so close to the water, if it were taken at low tide, that the base of the lighthouse would be underwater at high tide..and get that the same fact would be true of the second picture...

 

[jc456]

So, jc also clearly doesn't know how tides function. Fascinating, how most deniers are all so utterly incapable of even the most basic logical thinking.

And that was some impressive fraud from SSDD. His baseline mismatching was especially blatant. He's pulling out all the stop with his fraud.

Tides happen twice a day during specific alignment with sun, earth and moon. What does that have to do with the two photos?

Thinking isn't the crazy cat lady's best thing....she can't look at the older picture and grasp the fact that the lighthouse is so close to the water, if it were taken at low tide, that the base of the lighthouse would be underwater at high tide..and get that the same fact would be true of the second picture...

^^^^^exactly^^^^^^

 

[Synthaholic]

Doesn't take much to make Queen Cut-n-Paste abandon her thread. Just a few facts.