Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You're not only stupid, you're insane.
That is the last time I waste my time with you....hopefully they get you someday...
OK, GoneSlacker, thanks for wanting to go to war when we don't have to. Only a slacker like you think the only way is war, particularly when it is unnecessary.
You will not get blown up in the blast because they won't have to.
You are a war criminal for promoting war that is unnecessary because we can prevent it, and I will come for a front-row seat in front of the gallows where you will entertain us with the dead man's jig.
Ok dumbfuck...thanks for showing you don't care if Iran gets nukes.
If they get nukes before Romney can stop them, then hopefully you get blown up in the blast.
Oh, explain how the US military would be war criminals for preventing a terrorist state from getting nukes. I'd love to see you left-wing scum try to pull that off in the kangaroo court in Europe.
So in your fucked up head, the western world doesn't have the legal right to protect Israel and others from nuclear blackmail or destruction?
Only a scumbag like you would believe the chimp of Iran would have a legal case against the US and Israel for taking out their program to build nuclear weapons.
Gone Bezerk is finally living down to his username. Funny shit.
Since the Iran-Iraq War and China’s modern economic resurgence, the PRC has deepened its relations with Iran—through continued arms sales and diplomatic engagement—and expanded its presence in the Middle East at large. In 1998, China‘s trade with the Middle East was valued at $7.4 billion; by 2007, it had increased more than twelvefold to $93.7 billion.15 Much of the increase has been driven by China‘s ever-growing hunger for oil imports. As of 2009, China imported more than 50 percent of the oil it consumes.16 China‘s greater need for resources and desire for unhindered growth have solidified its presence in the Middle East and complicated US attempts to break its ties to Iran.
http://csis.org/files/publication/REPORT_Iran_Chapter_X_China_and_Russia_Final_Revision2212.pdf
So far, however, statements from Russian government and industry communicate a message of business as usual, including the reaffirmation of the most controversial of the weapons deals to date: a sale, agreed upon in late 2005, of Tor-1 short-range air defense systems to Iran. One industry representative stressed: “We send our systems to Iran with a totally clear conscience, because they are exclusively defensive weapons.” A similar line is invariably offered by the spokespeople of Rosoboronexport, who insist that it operates exclusively within the framework of international law. Fully aware of the international concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear program, as well as the U.S. position on military cooperation with Iran, Russia endorses preserving contacts in this sensitive sphere even though it faces unfavorable consequences for doing so. What factors lie behind this preference?
http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/pm_0427.pdf
The IRI purchased $400 million worth of weapons from the PRC between 1993 and 1996, and $600 million during the 1997-2000 period.42 In addition to small arms, Beijing supplied Tehran with artillery pieces, anti-ship cruise missiles, surface-to-air missiles, fighter jets, tanks, armored personnel carriers, and fast-attack patrol vessels. Contemporary Chinese supplies to Iran have included: large-caliber sniper rifles, armor-piercing rounds, C-802 ―Silkworm‖ anti-ship cruise missiles, shoulder-fired HN-5 anti-aircraft missiles, 107mm rockets, 60mm and 82mm mortars, rocket-propelled grenades, anti-aircraft guns, landmines, and components for roadside bombs....
WASHINGTON (AP) — Strained by the demands of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is a significant risk that the U.S. military won't be able to quickly and fully respond to yet another crisis, according to a new report to Congress.
The assessment, done by the nation's top military officer, Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, represents a worsening from a year ago, when that risk was rated as moderate.
Gen. Pace: Military capability eroding - USATODAY.com
I think that about covers it for those who are more interested in spouting off without thinking rather than considering the facts involved.
Dumbfuck, explain how a 2 year old "defence" report on the UK military is relevant here.
Oh, but Navy1960 is soooooo smart.
Did I walk into a mental ward with you ass clowns?
Gone Bezerk is finally living down to his username. Funny shit.
I think some people here like Jake the Fake, California Girl and Navy1960 are posting in the same mental ward computer room.
Dumbfuck, explain how a 2 year old "defence" report on the UK military is relevant here.
Oh, but Navy1960 is soooooo smart.
Did I walk into a mental ward with you ass clowns?
Gone Bezerk is finally living down to his username. Funny shit.
He is smart. I have a huge amount of respect for his intellect, and his non-partisan opinions. I'm more honored to call him a friend than I am with anyone else on this board. You, on the other hand, have the mental agility of a dead dog.
Personally, I would prefer that Iran not know whether or not we are prepared to or have the capacity to go to war. Some things are best left in the shadows.
GettingHurt merely demonstrates his lack of grasp on the subject.
Don't worry Navy1960....liberals defend your fake claims to being a military hero, they even made it legal.
CaliforniaGirl will be there defending you until the end.
