Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
Shooter A has a 20 round magazine that jams on round 3, because his Glock was designed for a 15 round magazine.
While he is confused and distracted, attempting to clear the jam, he is tackled and disarmed.
Shooter B, who has spent 100 hours practicing changing 10 round magazines under duress, chooses a location where he has plenty of space to trade for reloading time and kills 30 people then shoots himself when the armed first responders arrive.
/thread.
Still waiting for an answer to whether police must adhere to the 10 round magazine requirement.
Was there some part of stopped at first reload you didn't understand? I do like the jamming though. Doesn't play well with the idea that anyone can quickly and easily make a hi cap magazine that works flawlessly though.
Off duty police do. On duty police would require more research. I would think they would not as apprehending probably uses more rounds than defending.
You pulled that directly out of your ass.
If there is a situation where a police officer would need 15 rounds, there is a situation where a civilian could need 15 rounds.
This is the third failure of your premise.
Three strikes, it's out.
I'm sure you will continue to defend it, but it's DOA.
Nice civil debate though, appreciate that.
Yes it was just an example and like I said I did like you throwing out another possibility.
I disagree with you that an officer wouldn't need more rounds than a civilian. A civilian is not supposed to chase down criminals as an officer does. Defending is completely different and we have real stats to work from. Why do you deny the statistics?
I am enjoying the debate. I am completely open to one of you changing my mind, but I haven't heard anything that does. While I hope one of you is also open to my ideas I have my doubts.