Walz says abolish the Electoral College

Including slaves.
Obvious point is, you claim of explicit language is false, and you're too ***** to say it with your chest.

The constitution.
My claim isn't about the language you coward fucktard, it's about the effect of the legislation.
 
The southern states wanted them to count a full person.
The northern states did not want them counted at all.
Damn northern racists!
See. Look at you Sad Boys make believing instead of being proud of your real history.

You'd rather do theater and rhetorical word play. How liberal arts degree of you.

:lol:

The effect of not counting slaves for purposes of political and electoral power would of meant less power to slave owners. That's an easy conclusion to come to to anyone not pretending to be crippled by mental retardation for the purposes of their own argument. :lol:
 
I did not agree with you. If the electoral college was racially biased, then slaves would be counted the same as citizens. The 3/5 rule was only a compromise. You don't have to call people names.
Dipshit, the compromise was over how much power to give slave owners based on the number of black people they owned as property. And no, I don't have to call you names but when you morons get history so blatantly ass backwards I feel inclined to.
 
Meaning slaves. Both you and your Founders are too ***** to say it with your chest. I find that rather amusing.... :lol:

Who says? You Simp whites have no imagination. You're cuckolded to the Constitution which is why you'll sit passively and allow yourselves to be demographically replaced. I'm not beholden to your Simp feelings about it. We just need to pack the court with Justices who are of the opinion that the electoral college violates the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment and we're done with it. :lol:
I disagree with you about the electoral college but if you want to abolish it, you can only do that by amending the constitution.
 
Dipshit, the compromise was over how much power to give slave owners based on the number of black people they owned as property. And no, I don't have to call you names but when you morons get history so blatantly ass backwards I feel inclined to.
Thank you! you just made my point! Counting slaves at full value would be advantageous for racists.
 
Thank you! you just made my point! Counting slaves at full value would be advantageous for racists.
That would of resulted in them gettinf even more of an advantage than the one they got. My point, incase you've misplaced it because you're an idiot, is that the electoral college gave what should be black voting power, to deplorable ass white people. You again, seem to be agreeing with me here. This argument above about how they could of been given even more power if they had gotten even more of their way does not disprove my argument. It supports it. Moron.
 
Packing the court will do many things but eliminating the electoral college is not one of those things. For example, they had to amend the constitution to eliminate prohibition.
Who gives a shit what they did to accomplish that task? That doesn't invalidate my tactic. You morons forget what actually makes right which is might and there is no might mightier than the Supreme Court over what is or isn't constitutional. All one has to do is control the court.
 
I am glad to hear that more black people are abandoning the Democrat plantation!
It's hilariously amusing to watch you call the people who get 90% of the black vote the plantation owners while white Republicans in Southern States continue to use black votes to serve their own electoral desires. You people are going to go out being pretenders who are ashamed of who you really are. :lol:

I love that for you and your people.
 
Who gives a shit what they did to accomplish that task? That doesn't invalidate my tactic. You morons forget what actually makes right which is might and there is no might mightier than the Supreme Court over what is or isn't constitutional. All one has to do is control the court.
The Supreme Court sometimes recognizes the limit of its power. A good example is when the Court refused to rule in the case of Bush v. Gore in 2000. They sent it back to the state.
 
The Supreme Court sometimes recognizes the limit of its power. A good example is when the Court refused to rule in the case of Bush v. Gore in 2000. They sent it back to the state.
That's not even remotely what happened in that case you moron. Florida's Supreme Court ordered a recount and the United States Supreme Court ended it. Why are you people this confidently stupid? :dunno:

You guys do stupid with your chest out and I love it and I'm here for it. :lol:
 
15th post
:lol:

Is that an admission that the GOP could never win a vote from the majority of American citizens?
It would make it much easier for Democrats to steal elections. Then they wouldn’t have to cheat in all these different states
 
It would make it much easier for Democrats to steal elections. Then they wouldn’t have to cheat in all these different states
You know only Losers cry about how the game was stolen from them every time they lose, right? :dunno: :lol:
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom