Not necessarily. What happens when you increase minimum wage and companies lay off 1 out of every two employees and force the 1 guy to take on the work of two for the pay increase?
The guy who gets laid off certainly will be needing some welfare...
Then Australia and western Europe's McD's should be an epic fail by your logic, right?
Tea - really? Did I say anything about an "epic fail", lol? Please don't twist my words to suit your agenda. That's incredibly dishonest.
If you read my comment, I said that increasing the wage of employees will lead to McDonald's hiring less employees and pushing their current ones to work harder? The Atlantic article here agrees with this claim:
The Magical World Where McDonald's Pays $15 an Hour? It's Australia - Jordan Weissmann - The Atlantic
QUOTE.... "Or if not, they've at least managed to replace a few of them with computers. As Michael Schaefer, an analyst with Euromonitor International, told me, fast food franchises in Europe have been some of the earliest adopters of touchscreen kiosks that let customers order without a cashier. As always, the peril of making employees more expensive is that machines become cheaper in comparison."
.
Nice. You found an article written by Jordan Weissmann, the resident con of the Atlantic. Here is a review of Mr. Weissmann:
"But we have a new arrival in the battle for the AtlanticÂ’s most hackish writer: Jordan Weissmann. His relative anonymity is blown out of the water by this story on supposedly indulgent out-of-touch teacher unions in Buffalo. Weissmann writes Mitt Romney some Republican debate talking points about teacher unions by blowing up the fact that Buffalo teachers have reconstructive surgery covered by their insurance. Equating Buffalo teachers with Beverly Hills starlets getting breast implants, Weissmann paints a picture of union greed.
Where to start here? The sexism of the photo published at the top of the article? That Weissmann provides not a single example of what any of these teachers used the benefit for during this supposed boom in plastic surgery of recent years, not to mention any comprehensive data? That he doesnÂ’t bother to interview a single union member for his piece? That he doesnÂ’t explore any other possible way for Buffalo balance the budget? That he doesnÂ’t explore how much money Buffalo school administrators make?"
Jordan Weissmann: Hack - Lawyers, Guns & Money : Lawyers, Guns & Money
Most rational people find sources that have standing, that have shown impartiality, and that have no agenda. I suppose we should not be surprised at the source you found out there among the bat shit crazy con web sites.
And, Weissmann does not look at any actual studies, nor does he look at what has happened in this country. He simply does what he is known for: Pushes his right wing agenda.
Here are a couple of actual impartial articles, based on actual impartial studies. I know you won't like them, but you can go ahead and get back to your favored bat shit crazy con sites to feed your agenda.
http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/min-wage-2013-02.pdf
Employment and the Minimum Wage?Evidence from Recent State Labor Market Trends | Economic Policy Institute
Should you have no agenda (Yes, I know that leaves you out, me boy.) then looking at the impartial roundup of studies done on the subject pretty much come down to the following, form the epi atticle linked above:
"The question of whether moderate minimum wage increases have an insignificantly positive or insignificantly negative impact on particular segments of the labor market will continue to be fruitful work for economists. In the meantime, policy makers should be aware that the facts clearly show that the benefits of such increases outweigh any potential costs."
If you actually read the information on the studies, what you learn is that advantages include lower turnover, higher productivity, and importantly, increases in aggregate demand since low wage workers generally spend nearly all of their incomes.