Waffle House shooting, at least 4 killed

[BasicHumanUnit]

I haven't heard anyone suggest taking all guns, we do need stronger gun laws though. Nobody needs to own a gun for mass killing. The constitution allows arms if you are in a militia.

LIE AH !!!!

And stop these underhanded attempts to redefine the 2nd !!!

 

[Brain357]

People with guns sure kill people faster than those that don't.

And your solution is to take all guns away from good, law abiding people? (You'll never get them all and mostly criminals will still have them....THANKS!!)

You seem to have NO REGARD whatsoever for the purpose of the US Constitution's 2nd Amendment

I haven't heard anyone suggest taking all guns, we do need stronger gun laws though. Nobody needs to own a gun for mass killing. The constitution allows arms if you are in a militia.

There is no requirement to be in the militia in order to keep and bear arms

Thats what the second clearly states.

 

[K9Buck]

Ummmm. You are behind the times, chief. The dude has been identified. He's not black.

Fair enough.

 

[Brain357]

I haven't heard anyone suggest taking all guns, we do need stronger gun laws though. Nobody needs to own a gun for mass killing. The constitution allows arms if you are in a militia.

LIE AH !!!!

And stop these underhanded attempts to redefine the 2nd !!!

Ah and now the they want all our guns tactic. Cute.

 

[Brain357]

Ummmm. You are behind the times, chief. The dude has been identified. He's not black.

Fair enough.

You have a history of being wrong.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Ummmm. You are behind the times, chief. The dude has been identified. He's not black.

Fair enough.

Do we have an 87% problem?

 

[BlackSand]

Well, for the record, I would have preferred that the brave customer had shot the murderer as he was absconding IF he had the ability to do so. We can agree to disagree.

Once he disarmed the gunman ... There would be no legal reason to shoot him.

.​

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Yeah, I don't see that going on in Denmark, Japan, Germany, UK.... Funny scare tactic though.

Because for nearly 100 years now ALL of the countries you just mentioned have enjoyed the Umbrella of US protections and global stability....The strongest nation on Earth which HAPPENS to (COINCIDENCE?) to have a Constitutional RIGHT to bear arms.

Go figure,... pudding for brains

If the US ever falls (and you shit for brains morons are working SO hard on it), Dictators will more than likely take all of the nations you mentioned.

The US and it's powerful (PRO ARMED CITIZEN CONSTITUTION) has keep the world civilized.
Why do you want all humans to suffer as the North Koreans do? WHY????

China just got one....Venezuela just got one.....Russia has one ......You can't wait to see that list grow can you?

 

[Brain357]

Ummmm. You are behind the times, chief. The dude has been identified. He's not black.

Fair enough.

Think I know your problem:
New Study Claims White Men Buy Tons Of Guns Because They Are Afraid Of Black People

 

[K9Buck]

I don't have to rent, fool. I own.

Did I hurt your feelings?

 

[jon_berzerk]

Ummmm. You are behind the times, chief. The dude has been identified. He's not black.

Fair enough.

no he is a crazy from Illinois

 

[Skull Pilot]

People with guns sure kill people faster than those that don't.

And your solution is to take all guns away from good, law abiding people? (You'll never get them all and mostly criminals will still have them....THANKS!!)

You seem to have NO REGARD whatsoever for the purpose of the US Constitution's 2nd Amendment

I haven't heard anyone suggest taking all guns, we do need stronger gun laws though. Nobody needs to own a gun for mass killing. The constitution allows arms if you are in a militia.

There is no requirement to be in the militia in order to keep and bear arms

Thats what the second clearly states.

No it doesn't.

It clearly states the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

It says nothing about that right being contingent on service in a militia

 

[Brain357]

Yeah, I don't see that going on in Denmark, Japan, Germany, UK.... Funny scare tactic though.

Because for nearly 100 years now ALL of the countries you just mentioned have enjoyed the Umbrella of US protections and global stability....The strongest nations on Earth which HAPPENS to (COINCIDENCE?) to have a Constitutional RIGHT to bear arms.

Go figure,... pudding for brains

Wow you sure make up funny things. You must have recent examples of us saving them?

 

[Skull Pilot]

How many people has Waffle House killed with their high carb high fat fare?

 

[LoneLaugher]

I don't have to rent, fool. I own.

Did I hurt your feelings?

Nope. You just arrogantly assumed that I would need to rent a firearm. I'm a dude who owns handguns. I'm just not afraid of life and I don't think I'm Rambo.

 

[Brain357]

People with guns sure kill people faster than those that don't.

And your solution is to take all guns away from good, law abiding people? (You'll never get them all and mostly criminals will still have them....THANKS!!)

You seem to have NO REGARD whatsoever for the purpose of the US Constitution's 2nd Amendment

I haven't heard anyone suggest taking all guns, we do need stronger gun laws though. Nobody needs to own a gun for mass killing. The constitution allows arms if you are in a militia.

There is no requirement to be in the militia in order to keep and bear arms

Thats what the second clearly states.

No it doesn't.

It clearly states the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

It says nothing about that right being contingent on service in a militia

It is quite clearly in reference to a militia.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It sure doesn't mention self defense....

 

[K9Buck]

Think I know your problem:
New Study Claims White Men Buy Tons Of Guns Because They Are Afraid Of Black People

I carry a small 9mm pistol as an insurance policy that I hope I'll never need. Liberals like you are often critical of guys like me, who have never hurt anyone, while refraining from criticizing the actual criminals that destroy so many lives.

 

[OldLady]

Yes, waffle house doesn't allow weapons in their restaurants.

They also tend to frown on customers cooking their own meal for safety reasons ... Even if they clean the grill afterwards.

.​

You've tried it, eh?

 

[Brain357]

Think I know your problem:
New Study Claims White Men Buy Tons Of Guns Because They Are Afraid Of Black People

I carry a small 9mm pistol as an insurance policy that I hope I'll never need. Liberals like you are often critical of guys like me, who have never hurt anyone, while refraining from criticizing the actual criminals that destroy so many lives.

And you seem to have a fear of black people.

 

[Skull Pilot]

And your solution is to take all guns away from good, law abiding people? (You'll never get them all and mostly criminals will still have them....THANKS!!)

You seem to have NO REGARD whatsoever for the purpose of the US Constitution's 2nd Amendment

I haven't heard anyone suggest taking all guns, we do need stronger gun laws though. Nobody needs to own a gun for mass killing. The constitution allows arms if you are in a militia.

There is no requirement to be in the militia in order to keep and bear arms

Thats what the second clearly states.

No it doesn't.

It clearly states the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

It says nothing about that right being contingent on service in a militia

It is quite clearly in reference to a militia.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It sure doesn't mention self defense....

There is no contingency if there was the right would not have been declared as belonging to the people.

And the security of a free state includes the security of the individuals who make the state possible