Volodymyr Zelenskyy: “I will never accept any decisions between the USA and Russia” About Peace in Ukraine

The rich pay most of the taxes you dumb shit.

His point stands. The rich are taxed at far lower rates than they were before Reagan.

Reagan ran against the deficit in 1980, which was about $200 billion.

He went on to tri-le the national debt in i years.

w thought that wasn’t good enough, so he gave away budget surpluses with a new tax cut that produced deficits on day one. Then he started an unnecessary war in the wrong country and lost it, doubling the national debt again in the process.

Trump added 8 trillion.
 
His point stands. The rich are taxed at far lower rates than they were before Reagan.

Reagan ran against the deficit in 1980, which was about $200 billion.

He went on to tri-le the national debt in i years.

w thought that wasn’t good enough, so he gave away budget surpluses with a new tax cut that produced deficits on day one. Then he started an unnecessary war in the wrong country and lost it, doubling the national debt again in the process.

Trump added 8 trillion.
You need a history lesson.
 
His point stands. The rich are taxed at far lower rates than they were before Reagan.

Reagan ran against the deficit in 1980, which was about $200 billion.

He went on to tri-le the national debt in i years.

w thought that wasn’t good enough, so he gave away budget surpluses with a new tax cut that produced deficits on day one. Then he started an unnecessary war in the wrong country and lost it, doubling the national debt again in the process.

Trump added 8 trillion.
The debt is based on overspending, taxing any one American more than another by percentage is absurd!
 
Russian propoganda.

When the Russian invasion came, NOONE in Donbass rose up in support of their “liberators”

And when the Russians ended the fiction of the Russian created Dombass People’s Republic and started demanding that people take Russian passports and set up gulags there, the lie was on full display.
Plain lie. Just read something situation in Donbass back in 2014.
Just for example:
 
No, you’re rooting for Putin. Just as your fuhrer is.
Hitler! Hitler! Hitler! Russia! Russia! Russia!

Don’t these Dembots ever learn? All they do is double down on the hate and idiocy that got them kicked out in the first place.
 
Trump added 8 trillion.
Trillion dollar budget deficits started under Obama. Trump didn't have any until Covid hit. None of Biden's budget deficits were under a trillion dollars. Look it up.
 
His point stands. The rich are taxed at far lower rates than they were before Reagan.

Reagan ran against the deficit in 1980, which was about $200 billion.

He went on to tri-le the national debt in i years.

w thought that wasn’t good enough, so he gave away budget surpluses with a new tax cut that produced deficits on day one. Then he started an unnecessary war in the wrong country and lost it, doubling the national debt again in the process.

Trump added 8 trillion.

Our problem isn't not enough tax revenue. It is inefficiency and corruption. Everybody knows this deep down, but for some reason Democrats have a hard time admitting it.
 
Last edited:
ALWAYS the bottom line, What ever is going on Never support a DICTATOR.
Batista, Somoza, South Vietnamese dictators, South Korean dictators..... I could go on, but it's clear enough that your statement is wildly anti-american!
 
Keep telling yourself when Nukes start flying!

So by that logic, we should give him Alaska back.

I mean, right, it used to Be Russian Territory. And we wouldn't want the nukes to start flying.

Why not?


He doesn't "fight" Ukraine. Not yet. It's just a gentle slapping of unruly slut.

Wow, really? A country that wants to remain independent of people who have oppressed them for centuries is an "unruly slut"?
 
15th post
So by that logic, we should give him Alaska back.
No. Alaska is much more important for America than Ukraine. And, Alaska is lesser important for Russian than Ukraine. Russians want to take Alaska, but not ready to pay more than one million Russian lives for it. America want to take Crimea, but not ready to pay more than one million of American lives for it. Russia does want to keep Crimea and Novorussia and liberate rest of Ukraine, and ready to pay for it more than 50 million Russian lives. America does want to keep Alaska and California, and ready to pay more than 50 mln killed.

I mean, right, it used to Be Russian Territory. And we wouldn't want the nukes to start flying.
Exactly. If Russians take Alaska, or Americans take Ukraine - they'll use them for launching nukes. Its not "a gun pointed into your forehead" (as missiles on Cuba or in Turkey are). Its "a gun in your mouth" and you can only hope that another side don't pull the trigger. That is exactly why fighting conventional or even nuclear war to defend Alaska or Crimea is "lesser evil" than allowing enemy to take them. When somebody tell you "get on your knees, open your mouth and take the barrel of my gun", you'd prefer to shoot first, especially if your chances are quite good.

Wow, really? A country that wants to remain independent of people who have oppressed them for centuries is an "unruly slut"?
Yes. They don't want to be "independent". Its not a problem to be independent. They (some of them) want to join NATO (and use NATO to cover them while they are genociding the local Russians) and NATO want to use Ukraine to attack Russian Federation itself.
 
No. Alaska is much more important for America than Ukraine. And, Alaska is lesser important for Russian than Ukraine. Russians want to take Alaska, but not ready to pay more than one million Russian lives for it. America want to take Crimea, but not ready to pay more than one million of American lives for it. Russia does want to keep Crimea and Novorussia and liberate rest of Ukraine, and ready to pay for it more than 50 million Russian lives. America does want to keep Alaska and California, and ready to pay more than 50 mln killed.

I doubt Russia is willing to pay 50MM lives for Ukraine. They are barely willing to pay the 100K or so they've lost, which is why they are outsourcing the war to the Norks.

But if you get right down to it... Ukraine has millions of people. Alaska is a frozen Tundra where almost no one lives. Maybe we could make a trade.

Or maybe we can just hold Russia to the international standard established after WWII, that you don't invade other countries to take their shit.

Exactly. If Russians take Alaska, or Americans take Ukraine - they'll use them for launching nukes. Its not "a gun pointed into your forehead" (as missiles on Cuba or in Turkey are). Its "a gun in your mouth" and you can only hope that another side don't pull the trigger. That is exactly why fighting conventional or even nuclear war to defend Alaska or Crimea is "lesser evil" than allowing enemy to take them. When somebody tell you "get on your knees, open your mouth and take the barrel of my gun", you'd prefer to shoot first, especially if your chances are quite good.

I don't think this is a valid reason, really. We have submarines and ICBMs and hypersonic missiles now, we don't need a close base to launch nukes like we might have in 1962.

Russia is not the victim here, and you should probably tell the rest of your trolls on the Troll farm this won't work. If Trump sells out Ukraine, no one is going to praise him for it.


Yes. They don't want to be "independent". Its not a problem to be independent. They (some of them) want to join NATO (and use NATO to cover them while they are genociding the local Russians) and NATO want to use Ukraine to attack Russian Federation itself.

Okay, nobody was "genociding" the local Russians.

And if they want to live in Russia, it's not like Russia doesn't have plenty of room for them.

The problem with the "I can invade you if you have any Russians" is that no one would be safe.

20% of the population of Kazakhstan is Russian. Should they invade that, too?
 
I doubt Russia is willing to pay 50MM lives for Ukraine. They are barely willing to pay the 100K or so they've lost, which is why they are outsourcing the war to the Norks.
Of course Russia prefer to achive those vital goals with minimal losses. But if necessary - 50MM is an acceptable price, too. Its not just about 20 mln of Russians living in Ukraine, its more than that. The EU officially declared their goals as "decolonisation and dechristinisation of Russia".

But if you get right down to it... Ukraine has millions of people. Alaska is a frozen Tundra where almost no one lives. Maybe we could make a trade.
You just don't know how to live and build cities in Tundra. And no, Alaska is not just Tundra. Its not just gold and oil and gas. Its not just a strategic Bering strait. Mostly important its a perfect place for IRBMs to attack US ICBMs.

Or maybe we can just hold Russia to the international standard established after WWII, that you don't invade other countries to take their shit.
Really? That "standard" finished its existence after America's unprovoked and illegal aggressions against Serbia in 1999 and Iraq in 2003.

I don't think this is a valid reason, really. We have submarines and ICBMs and hypersonic missiles now, we don't need a close base to launch nukes like we might have in 1962.
Submarines need time to come to reliable launch position, like a time necessary to open holster and took the gun. Sides have time to react before SSBNs had reached their firing positions. And, you know, with modern sensors and computers the ocean becomes more and more transparent. IRBMs are the barrel of already cocked and loaded gun in your mouth. No time for reaction.

Russia is not the victim here, and you should probably tell the rest of your trolls on the Troll farm this won't work. If Trump sells out Ukraine, no one is going to praise him for it.
It mostly depends on your definition of the term "victim", but Russia, de-facto and de-juri defend itself.

Okay, nobody was "genociding" the local Russians.

Denialism is a form of support of genocide. Of course there was genocide. It was an officially, publically and openly declared strategy of the Kievan regime. "Our children will go to school, and their children will be hiding in the basements".
And if they want to live in Russia, it's not like Russia doesn't have plenty of room for them.
If they want to live in Russia and take their land and their houses with them, I also don't see a problem here. And if Banderlogs want to live in West, Canada and Argentina still accept Nazi refugees, didn't they?

The problem with the "I can invade you if you have any Russians" is that no one would be safe.
Actually, its "I can invade if you discriminate, abuse and kill Russians, or if you are making the preparation to fight war against Russia". And most of countries are perfectly safe. And, actually, no one is safe with American "I can invade you just for lulz, without any particular reason".

20% of the population of Kazakhstan is Russian. Should they invade that, too?
No, until Kazakhstan doesn't genocide local Russians or making preparations to join a hostile alliance.
 
So by that logic, we should give him Alaska back.

I mean, right, it used to Be Russian Territory. And we wouldn't want the nukes to start flying.



Wow, really? A country that wants to remain independent of people who have oppressed them for centuries is an "unruly slut"?
Are the Russians trying to invade Alaska?
 
Back
Top Bottom