Gunny
Gold Member
BTW, I didnt say that YOU said,
I said that you said that the Libruls betrayed Americas ideals,
Egads! Shot in the ass with semantics!

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BTW, I didnt say that YOU said,
I said that you said that the Libruls betrayed Americas ideals,
You're starting to speak that language we don't speak here again.
I don't belong to a party, and if I did, it wouldn't be either of the two main offerings now. I'd have to make up my own.
You forgot to add as a Marine I am a baby killer and murder civilians for sport.
No, I would say because you were a Marine you were a loser who had no life and no where to go thus you joined the Military like all the Rejects who have no life do. Want to find a bunch of mindless robotic reject idiots, go join the core.
No, I would say because you were a Marine you were a loser who had no life and no where to go thus you joined the Military like all the Rejects who have no life do. Want to find a bunch of mindless robotic reject idiots, go join the core.
No, I would say because you were a Marine you were a loser who had no life and no where to go thus you joined the Military like all the Rejects who have no life do. Want to find a bunch of mindless robotic reject idiots, go join the core.
So T-Bor, do you appreciate your rights as an American citizen?
Do you enjoy the hard earned right to post such disrespectful bull shit?
Does it make you feel some how more "human"?
Have you thought for one moment, of those that have put THEIR lives on the line for the garbage of the world, such as yourself?
Why do I ask the obvious?
In the never ending believe that at some point in time, you FUCK HEADS will wake up!
But, I know in that hope I'm dreaming, so, back to playing video games, and filling your hopeless lives with drugs, and the lies of those that would enslave you.
Have a shitty life, you deserve it..........![]()
I defend his right to say it, but i always have the right to think t-bor is acting like an asshole, when he has diarhea of the mouth with comments like that. I certainly wont give him any more positive rep points, unless he apologizes and promises not to that again, and frankly, If he doesnt apologize, I might have to use my right, as given by the board to ding him.
Youre entitled to your opinion t-bor, and im entitled to buzz you, if i feel youre being a prick, and if you dont apologize, and refrain from such statements in the future, i might just have to ding you.
Brother, i didnt even give you a negative rep, did you just give me a negative rep?
Youre a vile person, but i decided not to ding you because i dont think people should ding others just because they dont like someone.
Why did you give me negative rep?
Can the stress level. He can neg-rep you, but it's for zero points since he has no rep power. However, if you insult someone and they neg rep you for it, you really don't have much of a complaint.
The official story was that North Vietnamese torpedo boats launched an "unprovoked attack" against a U.S. destroyer on "routine patrol" in the Tonkin Gulf on Aug. 2 and that North Vietnamese PT boats followed up with a "deliberate attack" on a pair of U.S. ships two days later.
The truth was very different.
Rather than being on a routine patrol Aug. 2, the U.S. destroyer Maddox was actually engaged in aggressive intelligence-gathering maneuvers in sync with coordinated attacks on North Vietnam by the South Vietnamese navy and the Laotian air force.
"The day before, two attacks on North Vietnam...had taken place," writes scholar Daniel C. Hallin. Those assaults were "part of a campaign of increasing military pressure on the North that the United States had been pursuing since early 1964."
On the night of Aug. 4, the Pentagon proclaimed that a second attack by North Vietnamese PT boats had occurred earlier that day in the Tonkin Gulf a report cited by President Johnson as he went on national TV that evening to announce a momentous escalation in the war: air strikes against North Vietnam.
But Johnson ordered U.S. bombers to "retaliate" for a North Vietnamese torpedo attack that never happened.
Lets not forget how we out and out lied to start that war too.
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2261
The tonkin incident that we used a basis to enter the war was a LIE.
I cant believe anyone would claim it was "worth it", it seems we STILL dont value all the human life that was lost or all the horrific suffering that we caused.
Then we have the lingering affects that still plague Vietnam...from OUR chemical warfare.
http://www.hatfieldgroup.com/files/ENN_12966.pdf
In fact here is a list of links that discuss the problems Vietnam still faces from it all.
http://www.hatfieldgroup.com/files/Hgnews.htm
Yea but we got to test new weapons on PEOPLE (since when did people become acceptable guinea pigs for weapons) and we got to test out some new battlefield medicine...(more live guinea pigs I guess).
Do not for one second pretend you give a rats shit about anyone else. You would have us abandon Iraq to chaos murder and mayhem because you do not like our Government or troops. Your excuse of course being that magically if we leave peace and harmony will break out and all will be well? No you admit murder chaos and mayhem will ensue, you just don't care cause it won't be Americans involved.
Do not for one second pretend you have a clue what my feelings are about anything. You get it wrong all the time.
The murder and chaos ensued due to the US invasion and will continue with no end in sight as long as we are there. Its not our nation, it belongs to Iraq. They have the RIGHT and the BURDEN of determining their own lives and futures. We certainly owe them more than we can ever PAY IN MONEY for what we have done to them and while we are quite capable of creating destruction, we are NOT capable of fixing it.
Yep, violence will continue after the US leaves but at least they can make real headway to their own self-determination. And it will also be true that Iraqis wont install a govt that favors americas interests over Iraqs.... and its also true that they wont turn over their oil resources via the hydrocarbon laws the US is trying to shove down their throats. Its probably also true that so many of the american mercenary companies *like blackwater*, and companies like Betchel and Halliburton will be tossed out on their can. Its also true that they will take control over the oil revenues as well!
Maybe you shouldnt pretend to care about people while advocating they continue to be subjected to a foreign occupation by a nation who invaded them immorally and illegally and has brought them nothing but death and destruction.
BTW, when are you going to give a rats ass about the fact that the USA LIED again to invade another nation??? You sure dont seem to care much about that.
When someone provides credible evidence anyone lied, I may consider it. But since that never happened I do not need to worry about it. The only lie in the Iraq War is that Bush did so. One has to disengage their brain to buy that, ignore the entire world, the democrats and the UN.
The threat comes from Iraq. It arises directly from the Iraqi regime's own actions -- its history of aggression, and its drive toward an arsenal of terror. Eleven years ago, as a condition for ending the Persian Gulf War, the Iraqi regime was required to destroy its weapons of mass destruction, to cease all development of such weapons, and to stop all support for terrorist groups. The Iraqi regime has violated all of those obligations. It possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons. It has given shelter and support to terrorism, and practices terror against its own people. The entire world has witnessed Iraq's eleven-year history of defiance, deception and bad faith.
We also must never forget the most vivid events of recent history. On September the 11th, 2001, America felt its vulnerability -- even to threats that gather on the other side of the earth. We resolved then, and we are resolved today, to confront every threat, from any source, that could bring sudden terror and suffering to America.
Members of the Congress of both political parties, and members of the United Nations Security Council, agree that Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must disarm. We agree that the Iraqi dictator must not be permitted to threaten America and the world with horrible poisons and diseases and gases and atomic weapons. Since we all agree on this goal, the issues is : how can we best achieve it?
If we know Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today -- and we do -- does it make any sense for the world to wait to confront him as he grows even stronger and develops even more dangerous weapons?
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction."
- Dick Cheney
August 26, 2002
"We know for a fact that there are weapons there."
- Ari Fleischer
January 9, 2003
Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.
- George W. Bush
March 17, 2003