What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

VIDEO: Watch Larry Elder Brilliantly Turn the Tables on "The Big Lie"

busybee01

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
23,954
Reaction score
5,725
Points
290
Oooooppsss....it's like shooting fish in a barrel.

" The bureau used the dossier’s accusations as the basis for four warrants to surveil Trump aide Carter Page during the 2016 campaign and early months of the Trump Presidency. The 57 pages of notes from the source interviews make clear that the FBI knew the dossier was junk as early as January 2017.

Former British spy Christopher Steele, whose dirt-digging was financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign, based nearly all of his dossier allegations on information from one unidentified “primary subsource.” The FBI didn’t corroborate the Steele dossier’s claims prior to its first application to surveil Mr. Page in October 2016, and it didn’t get around to interviewing the source until nearly four months later."


The initial investigation was opened because of intelligence received from a Australian diplomat. The IG determined that the reason was valid. The dossier was not junk. It had 2 facts in it. It correctly stated that the Russians were interfering in our elections which was not known outside of intelligence or law enforcement circles. It correctly pegged a Russian embassy worker as a spy and Moscow was forced to withdraw him.

Carter Page left the campaign in late September and warrants were not obtained until October. They were not spying on the Trump campaign. We still have not seen the warrants the FBI used so we do not know whether the Steele dossier was the only source.
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
235,360
Reaction score
59,548
Points
2,190
Hillary's supporters rioted on election night
Claiming that Hillary supporters were burning police cars isn't supported. How does he know they were Clinton supporters and not just anti-Trump? If Clinton could have inspired that level of fervor she might have won the damn election.

We saw the reaction of Hillary supporters again and again and again

Look at those Hillary supporters crying…….HA, HA, HA

Trump supporters rioted and took over the Capitol
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
235,360
Reaction score
59,548
Points
2,190
Thanks for verifying my point in all of this. She did claim the election was stolen, that is all. :beer:
Really?

How did she claim it was stolen from her?
 

DukeU

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2020
Messages
4,080
Reaction score
4,255
Points
1,938
Really?

How did she claim it was stolen from her?
1628607839158.png
 

busybee01

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
23,954
Reaction score
5,725
Points
290
Thanks for verifying my point in all of this. She did claim the election was stolen, that is all. :beer:

She had every reason to think so. The Russians clearly did not want Clinton to win. Also the probe of Clinton should not have been acknowledged publicly and the fact that they were re-opening it should not have been made public. At no time did she say there were fraudulent ballots involved nor did she ever try to invalidate the ballots of lawful voters. Two totally different cases. Try again.
 

DukeU

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2020
Messages
4,080
Reaction score
4,255
Points
1,938

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
69,392
Reaction score
16,944
Points
2,190
Location
Kazmania
You are a liar. Trump was impeached for inciting a riot. Also we now know Trump was trying to stage a coup.

I like how in sentence one you called me a liar then you lied in sentences 2 and 3.

Never happened, Nazi. Which is why you repeatedly can't quote Trump inciting anything.

Speaking of your insurrection all last summer supporting leftist goons attacking US cities, yes, you are a traitor
 

JustAGuy1

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
10,762
Reaction score
9,652
Points
2,140
The initial investigation was opened because of intelligence received from a Australian diplomat. The IG determined that the reason was valid. The dossier was not junk. It had 2 facts in it. It correctly stated that the Russians were interfering in our elections which was not known outside of intelligence or law enforcement circles. It correctly pegged a Russian embassy worker as a spy and Moscow was forced to withdraw him.

Carter Page left the campaign in late September and warrants were not obtained until October. They were not spying on the Trump campaign. We still have not seen the warrants the FBI used so we do not know whether the Steele dossier was the only source.

You've been corrected, just say thank you and move on.
 

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
108,526
Reaction score
38,997
Points
2,290
Location
Headmaster's Office, Hogwarts
There was no double standard. Most of the voters know this. If Democrats lose Congress it will be because of voter suppression.
Sorry....but precedent dictates that anyone who doesn't trust the election results is an enemy of the state and subject to arrest and execution.
 

Mr. Friscus

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2020
Messages
895
Reaction score
1,350
Points
898
Not once ever did Hillary Clinton say the election was "stolen", and not once EVER did she say Trump was an "illegitimate President". This asshole is lying through his teeth.

No one has ever suggested that the Russians changed the outcome of the election.

This guy is a total liar, and all he has done here is lie.
WOW

Hillary Clinton dismissed President Donald Trump as an “illegitimate president” and suggested that “he knows” that he stole the 2016 presidential election in a CBS News interview to be aired Sunday.


Care to retract your statement?
 

Mr. Friscus

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2020
Messages
895
Reaction score
1,350
Points
898
An "ass stomping". It was the weakest possible deflection. Hillary conceded the election and a peaceful transfer of power ensued. She didn't start an insurrection or attempt a coup.
What do you have to say about your false statements?

You said Hillary never said Trump was an illegitmate president and she never said the election was stolen. You were given multiple examples of her saying just that.

What do you have to say for yourself?
 

BlindBoo

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
41,738
Reaction score
8,528
Points
2,030
No. You missed the point. Not surprising.

CNN et al bleated and puked bloody murder when Trump claimed the election was stolen, but when Hildog said the EXACT FUCKING SAME THING in 2016/17 they were SILENT!!!!

How many court cases did she file? What states did she call and ask them to find enough vote for her to win.

Exactly, except not.
 

struth

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
14,596
Reaction score
9,125
Points
1,118
What they can say is limited. DOJ rules do not allow DOJ personnel to interfere in elections. That is one area where Comey might have violated DOJ rules. Announcing they were re-opening the investigation the weekend before the election definitely violated that rule.

She did not challenge the results and she did not undermine the security of the ballots. TRY AGAIN!
she did challenge the result

Comey had to let Congress know, because he said he would. So criminal contempt or a policy violation?

Had McGabe etc not hide the fact her state dept emails weee also found on a sexual predator’s laptop, they would have already investigated it
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
69,392
Reaction score
16,944
Points
2,190
Location
Kazmania

AZrailwhale

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2020
Messages
3,621
Reaction score
2,911
Points
1,938
Location
Arizona
She has every right to believe the election was stolen. We had unprecedented Russian interference in the election and it was aimed at Clinton. They assisted Sanders in the primary and Trump and Stein in the general. Then you had Comey making a major blunder by announcing publicly that they were re-opening the investigation the weekend before the election. I wonder what voters would have thought if they knew the Trump campaign helped the Russians help Trump. Clinton has never claimed there was massive fraud.
The same Comey that had given Hillary a pass on her having classified documents on her private server and lying about it. He said she was guilty of violating the law, then turned right around in the next breath and said she shouldn't be prosecuted for violating the law. Hillary doesn't have room to talk about Comey's conduct. Anybody else would have been arrested for what she did and been running a campaign while out on bail for a Federal Felony.
 

otto105

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
14,007
Reaction score
3,375
Points
170
VIDEO: Watch Larry Elder Brilliantly Turn the Tables on "The Big Lie"

Larry Elder, who could be California's next governor if the recall election next month against Gavin Newsom is successful, was interviewed by the Sacramento Bee editorial board. One of the editors asked Elder a gotcha question about "The Big Lie." Elder took that question and completely turned the tables on it to the extent that it stunned the editor.



Comment:
Larry has been doing this for at least 3 hours a day for DECADES. With facts. Nobody is going to beat him in a debate or get the better of him in an argument.
I would love to see a Newsom-Elder debate.
Larry Elder lays out the truth so hard the fake news interviewer has no avenue to attack … and since he can’t agree he is literally left with nothing but … “(long pause) … urrrm!” Priceless.
-30% whiner
 

Dragonlady

Designing Woman
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
35,041
Reaction score
16,196
Points
1,600
Location
Niagara Escarpment
VIDEO: Watch Larry Elder Brilliantly Turn the Tables on "The Big Lie"

Larry Elder, who could be California's next governor if the recall election next month against Gavin Newsom is successful, was interviewed by the Sacramento Bee editorial board. One of the editors asked Elder a gotcha question about "The Big Lie." Elder took that question and completely turned the tables on it to the extent that it stunned the editor.



Comment:
Larry has been doing this for at least 3 hours a day for DECADES. With facts. Nobody is going to beat him in a debate or get the better of him in an argument.
I would love to see a Newsom-Elder debate.
Larry Elder lays out the truth so hard the fake news interviewer has no avenue to attack … and since he can’t agree he is literally left with nothing but … “(long pause) … urrrm!” Priceless.

Elder was asked about Donald Trump's lie, and all he talked about was Hillary Clinton. What does Hillary Clinton have to do with Donald Trump's lie that the election was stolen. He didn't "turn the tables". He deflected the question and then lied about the things Hillary Clinton said, and tried to say what Trump did was no different.

Hillary wasn't crisscrossing the country giving interviews saying she was really President nor did she say the election was stolen. Lyin' Larry is trying to put Trump's words into Hillary's mouth. Simply because there is no defence for what Trump did.
 

Dragonlady

Designing Woman
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
35,041
Reaction score
16,196
Points
1,600
Location
Niagara Escarpment
The same Comey that had given Hillary a pass on her having classified documents on her private server and lying about it. He said she was guilty of violating the law, then turned right around in the next breath and said she shouldn't be prosecuted for violating the law. Hillary doesn't have room to talk about Comey's conduct. Anybody else would have been arrested for what she did and been running a campaign while out on bail for a Federal Felony.

There have now been more than a half dozen investigations of Hillary's emails, including a 2 year investigation at the State Department by Mike Pompeo, and a Senate Investigation lead by Chuck Grassley, after Trump was Inaugurated. There was also the Inspector General's Report on the investigation, and Prosecutor Huber's review all of the Clinton Investigations - all after Trump became President. That's in addition to the 2 FBI Investigations.

ALL OF THESE INVESTIGATIONS, ALL OF WHICH WERE CONDUCTED BY REPUBLICANS, FOUND NO WRONG DOING ON THE PART OF HILLARY CLINTON. NONE OF THESE INVESTIGATIONS RECOMMENDED ANY CHARGES AGAINST HILLARY CLINTON. NOT ONE OF THEM.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$120.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top