toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
- Apr 29, 2017
- 98,806
- 104,734
- 3,615
This is a fallen world. Flesh eating didn't OFFICIALLY start until after the flood
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is a fallen world. Flesh eating didn't OFFICIALLY start until after the flood
You have that situation because of the choices you made. Why is killing so important to you as a Protestant
What does my religious affiliation have to do with any part of this discussion? Are you misleading us into believing that Catholics, for instance, don't occupy deer blinds? Or shoot pheasant or ducks?You have that situation because of the choices you made. Why is killing so important to you as a Protestant
If you have the approval of the world you might want to rethink a few thingsAlso, Christians are supposed to be set apart and different than the world. Not just like everyone else
buttercup, no one is arguing that. How many times have I referred to the scripture:I don't know how to say this without offending most of the Christians here, but I'm NGL... This is what is the most disappointing to me. I can understand NON-Christians defending violence and needless killing, and not believing that God's intent for this world and perfect will is peace and harmony, as it was in the beginning and as it will be again in the end.
But what I don't understand is why CHRISTIANS fight so hard to defend the status quo of exploitation, suffering and needless violence and killing....when it is NOT the way the world is supposed to be, and it's NOT what we should be defending.
Also, Christians are supposed to be set apart and different than the world. Not just like everyone else. We're supposed to live according to a higher standard, and be a light in this dark, messed up world.
You know what? I know for a fact that flesh eating Christians have caused atheists who otherwise would be open to God and the Gospel to reject Christianity BECAUSE of their callousness and disregard for animals. So carnist Christians (without realizing this) are causing nonbelievers and seekers to stumble and reject Christianity .... and that is a very serious thing that I believe God is going to hold Christians accountable for. The scriptures are clear about not causing others to stumble.
I'll probably be attacked for saying this, but it has to be said.... even if it's a hard pill to swallow.
ETA: I just want to add... I'm not claiming and I never have claimed that I'm a good witness... All of us are works in progress and I am definitely a work in progress....probably more than most. But I try. And about what I just said in the paragraphs above, I think in MOST cases it's unintentional, it's a collective blindspot in the Body of Christ. That's why I said something, because I think most Christians don't even realize that that is happening.
I have never heard an atheist say that his disbelief in God stems from meat eaters. I assume most of them are meat eaters also, so they wouldn't consider the act of eating a hamburger egregious enough to bank their eternity on. Sorry, but me eating a steak isn't contributing to the rejection of Christ. An atheist vegan maybe, but that is a pretty shallow reason for nonbelievers and seekers to nix the Lord.I know for a fact that flesh eating Christians have caused atheists who otherwise would be open to God and the Gospel to reject Christianity BECAUSE of their callousness and disregard for animals. So carnist Christians (without realizing this) are causing nonbelievers and seekers to stumble and reject Christianity ....
buttercup, no one is arguing that. How many times have I referred to the scripture:
Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
And posted that a time is coming when the lion will lay down with the lamb, but for now God has to deal with His children on our level.
And no one here is promoting the torturing of animals.
It is the Jesus would never eat fish, and the defiling of the temple and the comments made that are contrary to what the Bible tells us that were addressed by me and others.
I quoted
Mark 7:15: "There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him, but the things that come out of a person are what defile him".
and the shit hit the fan. For no reason other than there were 2 here, whose narrative didn't fit that scripture. Maligning other posters, discussing their character like they weren't here by talking around them to throw shade instead of addressing the posts, needs to stop. That isn't a good look for any of us.
I have never heard an atheist say that his disbelief in God stems from meat eaters. I assume most of them are meat eaters also, so they wouldn't consider the act of eating a hamburger egregious enough to bank their eternity on. Sorry, but me eating a steak isn't contributing to the rejection of Christ. An atheist vegan maybe, but that is a pretty shallow reason for nonbelievers and seekers to nix the Lord.
Oh the arrogance. Yes, teacher, I know that scripture. I also know when we will experience that phenomenon.Ok, I feel like we're finally getting somewhere now. ^ HERE is the specific part where I believe you go wrong. You DO acknowledge that one day the lion will lay down with the lamb, so that's good that you know that
That is misleading. Having a heart for animals, is one thing, and forsaking God because people eat meat is something completely different. Don't tell them how God and Abraham solidified their covenants then, or let the seekers read a Bible. If they think eating meat is a dealbreaker, then they'll are in for a real eye-opener once they are introduced to the God of the Bible.It's not a shallow reason for the atheists, agnostics or seekers who have a passion and heart for the plight of animal.
You just keep repeating it as if I never said anythingYou are misapplying it. I already stated the reasons why, which I did not see you reply to, you just keep repeating it as if I never said anything
Oh the arrogance. Yes, teacher, I know that scripture. I also know when we will experience that phenomenon.
And I know that until then we have been given everything to eat. And as Paul pointed out, food does not bring us near to God; we are no worse if we do not eat, and no better if we do.
Now let me introduce you to Romans 14:3
The one who eats everything must not belittle the one who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted him. Even if you and Carl don't...
Everybody should be forced to visit a slaughter house and see what that creature goes through for that hamburger they're eating. They should have to look that animal in the eye (they often have TEARS) before they are murdered because of your LUST and uncontrollable appetite. Many are so callous and soul damaged that they wouldn't care, but many would. The problem, like you said, people rarely see the heartbreak and the terror we subject them to. They KNOW they're about to DIE. And they HOPE till the last minute that it might not happen. But it does and GOD HEARD THEIR CRIES AND THEIR DEATHS WILL BE AVENGEDYou cut off 98% of my post and you cut it off immediately before the important part. Again, you keep ignoring most of what I post, even after I replied to your post in a point by point way. When I said it's good that you know that, you took that in the wrong way. Not everyone interprets those prophetic passages in the same way, and since earlier you seemed to have a very different view of the Garden of Eden and the pre-flood world, and since you hadn't acknowledged the point about the future restoration of Eden (even though I had repeated it numerous times) I was just glad that you acknowledged the Peaceable Kingdom. There was no need to take offense like that.
That Romans passage has nothing to do with veganism or ethical vegetarianism, it has to do with meat that may have been sacrificed to false gods, we can know that from similar scriptures from Paul in other books. So it was actually a discussion about idolatry. Paul trying to bring unity to two groups with different levels of sensitivity to the possibility of partaking in sacrifices to pagan gods.
The people who try to use that verse to justify modern day carnism always fail to read what Paul says in verse 15: "If your brother or sister is distressed because of what you eat, you are no longer acting in love. Do not by your eating destroy someone for whom Christ died." So he is definitely not saying "eat whatever you want even if it causes distress to others" he is saying the exact opposite. He clearly said if what you are eating is causing distress to others, then don't do it! So that should not be used as a justification for the modern day horror show of the animal industries. That is a misuse of that verse.
That is misleading. Having a heart for animals, is one thing, and forsaking God because people eat meat is something completely different. Don't tell them how God and Abraham solidified their covenants then, or let the seekers read a Bible. If they think eating meat is a dealbreaker, then they'll are in for a real eye-opener once they are introduced to the God of the Bible.
Lots of people I know love animals and volunteer their time at shelters and vet hospitals, and stop at Burger King on the way home.
Everybody should be forced to visit a slaughter house and see what that creature goes through for that hamburger they're eating. They should have to look that animal in the eye (they often have TEARS) before they are murdered because of your LUST and uncontrollable appetite. Many are so callous and soul damaged that they wouldn't care, but many would. The problem, like you said, people rarely see the heartbreak and the terror we subject them to. They KNOW they're about to DIE. And they HOPE till the last minute that it might not happen. But it does and GOD HEARD THEIR CRIES AND THEIR DEATHS WILL BE AVENGED
Christians especially have a responsibility to get this right
Yeah. There's a reason why parents will take kids to pick apples but not to a slaughterhouse to watch the bloodbath that literally looks like a horror movie.
While I don't agree with hunting either, at least the victim of their "sport" gets to live out its life before being unexpectedly gunned down like in a drive-by shooting in da hood. At least the victim had its life until that point.I know there are many hunters who have no problem with killing