Vax mandates are totally working!

Well..., These statistics are coming in faster than how many days God has created the world.



Can't wait for a couple of hours to find out the statistics of how many fools believe this crap.
 
You just claimed there is no evidence that higher community vaccination rates will slow community spread of the virus.

You sure you want to run with that?
Please do. Show us exactly where the MANDATE has limited the spread of COVID-19.

A year ago we were kissing the feet of all the folks stepping up to care for all those with COVID. Now there are thousands of those same health care workers who are willing to give up the careers they love rather than take the shot.

How can that happen? If it is so safe and good, wouldn't they be eager to get the shot? Do you know more about the vaccine than do they? How many of them have natural immunity due to having had the disease.
 
In Goober States? Don’t doubt it. Educated states where more are actually qualified to homeschool?? No
Speaking of Goobers - care to double down on your CA teacher nonsense? :D

Before your childish responses, you really should do some proper research about the ins and outs of homeschooling.
 
Lol - Got it. That is what California just did.
Guess who has THE strictest childhood vax standards in the country?
Mississippi - And no religious exemptions!
Well grateful now we're getting somewhere......I also know in TN they didnt threaten employers........yay freedom

All over a vaccine that doesn't work.
 
Agreed, vaccine mandates are having the desired effect of forcing more people to take the vaccine.

There is no indication that they are having any effect on stopping spread of the infection.

But, we all know this has nothing to do with lessening the spread of the infection.
Winner.jpg
 


Masks don’t work. At least a dozen scientific studies have shown that masks do nothing to stop the spread of respiratory viruses.

One meta-analysis published by the CDC in May 2020 found “no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks”.

Another study with over 8000 subjects found masks “did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection.”

There are literally too many to quote them all, but you can read them: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Or read a summary by SPR here.

While some studies have been done claiming to show mask do work for Covid, they are all seriously flawed. One relied on self-reported surveys as data. Another was so badly designed a panel of experts demand it be withdrawn. A third was withdrawn after its predictions proved entirely incorrect.

The WHO commissioned their own meta-analysis in the Lancet, but that study looked only at N95 masks and only in hospitals. [For full run down on the bad data in this study click here.]

Aside from scientific evidence, there’s plenty of real-world evidence that masks do nothing to halt the spread of disease.

For example, North Dakota and South Dakota had near-identical case figures, despite one having a mask-mandate and the other not:

so
1632843429316.png



South Dakota....no mask mandates.


In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid “cases” than counties with mask mandates. And despite masks being very common in Japan, they had their worst flu outbreak in decades in 2019.
 
Masks don’t work. At least a dozen scientific studies have shown that masks do nothing to stop the spread of respiratory viruses.

One meta-analysis published by the CDC in May 2020 found “no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks”.

Another study with over 8000 subjects found masks “did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection.”

There are literally too many to quote them all, but you can read them: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Or read a summary by SPR here.

While some studies have been done claiming to show mask do work for Covid, they are all seriously flawed. One relied on self-reported surveys as data. Another was so badly designed a panel of experts demand it be withdrawn. A third was withdrawn after its predictions proved entirely incorrect.

The WHO commissioned their own meta-analysis in the Lancet, but that study looked only at N95 masks and only in hospitals. [For full run down on the bad data in this study click here.]

Aside from scientific evidence, there’s plenty of real-world evidence that masks do nothing to halt the spread of disease.

For example, North Dakota and South Dakota had near-identical case figures, despite one having a mask-mandate and the other not:

so
1632843429316.png



South Dakota....no mask mandates.


In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid “cases” than counties with mask mandates. And despite masks being very common in Japan, they had their worst flu outbreak in decades in 2019.
one of that study's authors says that claim is incorrect

 
Lol, long COVID makes you the opposite of fit.
Clearly the most fit are the asymptomatics, who are not effected at all. This isn't rocket science. If breakthrough cases can lead to death, and have, what evidence do you it cannot lead to long covid?
 
one of that study's authors says that claim is incorrect



Politfact is a house organ of the Democrat Party.

PolitiFact.com is a project operated by the Tampa Bay Times, in which reporters and editors from the Times and affiliated media outlets "fact-check statements by members of Congress, the White House, lobbyists and interest groups".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PolitiFact.com



The St. PetersburgTampa Bay Times, which started PolitiFact in conjunction with the Congressional Quarterly, is a traditionally liberal paper. We note that PolitiFact's stories appear to damage Republicans far more often than Democrats despite the fact that PF tends to choose about as many stories dealing with Republicans as for Democrats. If the selection process was blind then either proportions should be approximately even or else the party with worse ratings should receive more ratings overall according to what PolitiFact lists as its selection criteria. Plus our independent research helps confirm the hypothesis. About PolitiFact Bias/FAQ



"The Tampa Bay Times, which produces the PolitFact Truth-o-Meter, has not endorsed a single Republican candidate this century for any of the three most important positions on the Florida election ballot. Accordingly, the Times scores a “Pants on Fire” for its lack of objectivity, according to an extensive analysis by Media Trackers Florida.

Since 2000, the Times has issued 10 endorsements in elections for U.S. President, U.S. Senate, and Florida Governor. Nine of the 10 endorsements went to Democrats, with the sole exception being theTimes’ endorsement of Democrat-leaning Independent Charlie Crist in the 2010 U.S. Senate contest." http://mediatrackers.org/florida/20...-times-scores-pants-on-fire-for-partisan-bias





PolitiFact’s liberal bias, yet again (Arizona law; Climategate)​




Democrats lie about everything.
 
"Perpetual vaccines"

Yeah, it's almost as if vaccines work and are safe. We will also enjoy perpetual organ transplants, perpetual cancer treatment, and perpetual care for for broken bones and bleeding cuts.

This is the human race, conquering mother nature. These are triumphs, not blights.


The flu is a perpetual vaccine.

More than half the population gets a booster every year like clockwork.

Funny, no one has a problem with that "perpetual" vaccine.
 

Forum List

Back
Top