LOLOL
There are no semantics
She made two separate and distinctive claims, both of which are are.
- Libby leaked her identity. True and she never said he was convicted for that in her ad.
- Trump pardoned Libby. Also true
Your inability to comprehend she didn't say Libby was convicted of leaking her identity nor did she say that trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity is no one's problem but yours
You stupid ******* hick, she said "his name is Scooter Libby and guess who pardoned him", try watching the lying video again. As I said, the implication was clear.
.
Your quote is a lie. She didn't say, "and."
You inserted that yourself in a failed attempt to connect the two statements together that were never connevted to begin with.
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Deleting the "and" doesn't change the context or implication. Keep on spinning commie loser, keep on spinning.
.
Of course it does. Otherwise, you wouldn't have altered her quote to mean something you wanted her to say instead of what she actually said.
"and" is used to concatenate thoughts, statements, etc.
She made two truthful and
independent statements among many...
- Libby leaked her identity
One has nothing to do with the other; nor could they since leaking her identity was not a criminal offense for which trump could pardon Libby.
She didn't connect the two by concatenating them with "and,"
you did. And you even put that in quotes as though she actually said it, which she didn't.
You're the liar, not her.